Introduction to the Legal System
Why do businesses require attorney services?
contracts
real estate
mergers, acquisitions
criminal defenses (liabilities)
labor laws
intellectual property, copyright
legal structures
worker compensation
law: enforceable rules that govern how a society acts. the purpose is to keep peace, moral standards, and provide a basis for compromise
jurisprudence: science of studying schools of legal thought
Law does not necessarily signal justice.
Jim Crow laws
Nazi ruling
North Korea
internment camps
There is historical reasoning behind modern day laws formed by ideas, customs, logic, and history. This creates a legal precedent.
natural law: based on religious, moral, and ethical principles inherent in human nature (laws against murder, stealing, etc)
positive law: within written law, human-made construct of mind (speed limits, etc)
legal positivism: idea that law and moral values are separate. there is no such thing as natural law, as the government dictates all rules to be obeyed.
landmark case: legal precedent that changes interpretation of law and/or establishes a new definition
common law: unwritten laws / precedents made by courts
stare decisis: principle of following legal precedents to establish new courts
all courts have to adhere to SCOTUS’s interpretations and past case rulings
if the pattern of interpretation changes, the precedent changes
EXAMPLES OF LANDMARK CASES
Anon. v Sheriff of London (defines larceny)
Hulle v. Orynge (defines trespassing)
nominal damage: symbolic award for wronging without real damage
Wearer v. Ward
assumption of risk: if a potentially damaging scenario is actively entered, there is no ground to sue
Butterfield v. Forrester (comparative v. contributory negligence varies in state)
contributory negligence: plaintiff’s negligence contributes to injury, so the plaintiff cannot collect as much
comparative negligence: plaintiff and defense is assigned damage based on the degree of fault
Hadley v. Baxendale
time is of the essence: in a contract, what is lost if a contract is breached must be specified in order to collect funds if either party takes too much time to fulfill their end
civil law: private relations within a community brought to court
disputes
claimant / plaintiff vs defendant
remedy
judgement
probability
private
criminal law: concerned with crimes (breaking of laws)
wrongs
prosecutor vs defendant
verdict
conviction
acquittal
sentence
punishment
burden of proof: proof beyond all doubt must be provided for defendant to be considered guilty, as such would cause their civil liberties’ to be lost
public
Starting a court case
plaintiff - summons and complaint - defendant replies
determine court jurisdiction (state, federal, etc)
issue claim
defend claim
allocation of cases
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
federal jurisdiction: matters of the Constitution, interstate dealings, cases that involve >$75,000 claim, etc. go to federal court
commerce clause: federal ability to regulate interstate commerce, instate commerce if one state is causing a burden on another state
“dormant” commerce clause: states cannot burden other states or regulate interstate commerce
Relevant Court Cases
Granholm v. Heald (economic discrimination)
Gibbons v. Ogden (federal authority over interstate waters)
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. US (commerce clause includes local regulation which might hurt commerce on interstate/federal territory)
Corps & First Amendment
false and inaccurate information is not protected
political speech is highly protected
commercial speech (printed, online, TV) is somewhat protected under some guidelines
Guidelines to be Protected Under the First Amendment
Speech
political speech is highly protected
time, manner, place restrictions
actual content is not restricted, but safety
don’t yell fire in a crowded movie theater
Central Hudson Test
“First, in order for the commercial speech to be considered protected speech under the First Amendment, the speech must concern lawful activity and the speech must not be misleading.
If this step is met and the commercial speech is considered speech, then the court will use steps 2-4 below to determine whether the government regulation is constitutional
Second, the alleged governmental interest in regulating the speech must be substantial
Third, the regulation must directly advance the governmental interest asserted
Fourth, the regulation must not be more extensive than is necessary to serve the interested expressed in step 3” — Cornell law school
Religion
establishment clause
lemon test used to determine if a law violates the first amendment
entangles government with religion (if so, violation)
prohibits / inhibits religious practice (if so, violation)
secular legislative purpose (if so, not a violation)
free exercise clause: no congressional law can prohibit religion
Press
no law abridging freedom of press
libel (written slander) is not protected
Petition: allow people to express grievances
Assembly: to (reasonably) gather (consider time, place, etc.)
Why do businesses require attorney services?
contracts
real estate
mergers, acquisitions
criminal defenses (liabilities)
labor laws
intellectual property, copyright
legal structures
worker compensation
law: enforceable rules that govern how a society acts. the purpose is to keep peace, moral standards, and provide a basis for compromise
jurisprudence: science of studying schools of legal thought
Law does not necessarily signal justice.
Jim Crow laws
Nazi ruling
North Korea
internment camps
There is historical reasoning behind modern day laws formed by ideas, customs, logic, and history. This creates a legal precedent.
natural law: based on religious, moral, and ethical principles inherent in human nature (laws against murder, stealing, etc)
positive law: within written law, human-made construct of mind (speed limits, etc)
legal positivism: idea that law and moral values are separate. there is no such thing as natural law, as the government dictates all rules to be obeyed.
landmark case: legal precedent that changes interpretation of law and/or establishes a new definition
common law: unwritten laws / precedents made by courts
stare decisis: principle of following legal precedents to establish new courts
all courts have to adhere to SCOTUS’s interpretations and past case rulings
if the pattern of interpretation changes, the precedent changes
EXAMPLES OF LANDMARK CASES
Anon. v Sheriff of London (defines larceny)
Hulle v. Orynge (defines trespassing)
nominal damage: symbolic award for wronging without real damage
Wearer v. Ward
assumption of risk: if a potentially damaging scenario is actively entered, there is no ground to sue
Butterfield v. Forrester (comparative v. contributory negligence varies in state)
contributory negligence: plaintiff’s negligence contributes to injury, so the plaintiff cannot collect as much
comparative negligence: plaintiff and defense is assigned damage based on the degree of fault
Hadley v. Baxendale
time is of the essence: in a contract, what is lost if a contract is breached must be specified in order to collect funds if either party takes too much time to fulfill their end
civil law: private relations within a community brought to court
disputes
claimant / plaintiff vs defendant
remedy
judgement
probability
private
criminal law: concerned with crimes (breaking of laws)
wrongs
prosecutor vs defendant
verdict
conviction
acquittal
sentence
punishment
burden of proof: proof beyond all doubt must be provided for defendant to be considered guilty, as such would cause their civil liberties’ to be lost
public
Starting a court case
plaintiff - summons and complaint - defendant replies
determine court jurisdiction (state, federal, etc)
issue claim
defend claim
allocation of cases
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
federal jurisdiction: matters of the Constitution, interstate dealings, cases that involve >$75,000 claim, etc. go to federal court
commerce clause: federal ability to regulate interstate commerce, instate commerce if one state is causing a burden on another state
“dormant” commerce clause: states cannot burden other states or regulate interstate commerce
Relevant Court Cases
Granholm v. Heald (economic discrimination)
Gibbons v. Ogden (federal authority over interstate waters)
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. US (commerce clause includes local regulation which might hurt commerce on interstate/federal territory)
Corps & First Amendment
false and inaccurate information is not protected
political speech is highly protected
commercial speech (printed, online, TV) is somewhat protected under some guidelines
Guidelines to be Protected Under the First Amendment
Speech
political speech is highly protected
time, manner, place restrictions
actual content is not restricted, but safety
don’t yell fire in a crowded movie theater
Central Hudson Test
“First, in order for the commercial speech to be considered protected speech under the First Amendment, the speech must concern lawful activity and the speech must not be misleading.
If this step is met and the commercial speech is considered speech, then the court will use steps 2-4 below to determine whether the government regulation is constitutional
Second, the alleged governmental interest in regulating the speech must be substantial
Third, the regulation must directly advance the governmental interest asserted
Fourth, the regulation must not be more extensive than is necessary to serve the interested expressed in step 3” — Cornell law school
Religion
establishment clause
lemon test used to determine if a law violates the first amendment
entangles government with religion (if so, violation)
prohibits / inhibits religious practice (if so, violation)
secular legislative purpose (if so, not a violation)
free exercise clause: no congressional law can prohibit religion
Press
no law abridging freedom of press
libel (written slander) is not protected
Petition: allow people to express grievances
Assembly: to (reasonably) gather (consider time, place, etc.)