1/26
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
dissociation
“splitting” of consciousness or the separation of mental processes, such as perception, memory, and self-awareness, that are normally integrated
removed from reality
a spectrum
dissociation spectrum: green, mild
meditation
hypnosis
concentration
absorption
dissociation spectrum: red, extreme
dissociative disorders
disconnection between thoughts, identity, consciousness, memory
sense of detachment from emotions
lack of self-identity
significant memory loss
dissociative amnesia
an inability to recall important autobiographical information that
should be stored in memory
ordinarily would be remembered
can be localized (childhood), selective (specific event), generalized (identity)
dissociative fugue specifier
unplanned travel or wandering (“wake up” at work)
confusion around personal identity or assumption of new identity (partial or full)
extremely rare
depersonalization
detached from one’s own thoughts, feelings, and/or behaviors
out-of-body experience
derealization
detached from one’s surroundings
things are experienced as unreal, dreamlike
depersonalization/derealization disorder
persistent, recurrent episodes of either or both
know these experiences are not real
dissociative identity disorder
two or more distinct identities or personality states (called alters), each with its own enduring pattern of perceiving, relating to, and thinking about the environment and the self
amnesia must occur, either in recall of ever day events, personal info, and/or traumatic event (forgetting how to drive, how to do one’s job)
cultural considerations (possession, taken over by a spirit)
average number of alters is 10
common alters: child (who experienced trauma), protector, persecutor (acts out more), opposite sex role
amnesia about some identities, one identity might not know another
etiology: attributed to interaction of several factors
overwhelming stress
dissociative capacity
lack of sufficient nurturing/compassion, past traumas
etiology: biological factors
no evidence for genetic component, criteria rules out those caused by biological factors
etiology: environmental factors
physical and sexual abuse
inconsistent parenting: parents who are both abusive and loving
disorganized attachment style
etiology: post-traumatic model
role of trauma and state-dependent learning (learning in one state is best recalled in the same state)
Ex: mary cannot recall abuse at age 4, but alter sandy can
etiology: socio-cognitive model
DID is a consequence of social learning and expectancies
inadvertent therapist cueing
media influence
sociocultural expectations regarding manifestations of DID
these influences combine to make vulnerable individuals believe their alters account for their experiences/symptoms
fantasy proneness and suggestibility
etiology: disruption of sleep-wake cycle model
sleep, memory, and dissociation are inter-related
sleep loss associated with dissociative-like experiences and executive functioning problems
sleep hygiene intervention reduces dissociative symptoms
why we moved away from the Post-Traumatic Model
measurement around cases of abuse are self-reported, no objective measures
studies are based on cross-sectional design (not able to establish causality, perspective studies, longitudinal)
researchers rarely control for overlapping conditions, similar disorders have similar presentation to DID (exposure leads to multiple different outcomes)
fantasy proneness
tendency to have deep, vivid involvement in fantasy
high proneness —> more likely to have DID
suggestibility
tendency to incorporate misleading info into memory
high suggestibility —> more likely to have DID
confirmation bias
tendency to seek info that is consistent with their view of the world
people also discount info inconsistent with their world view
therapist bias
repeatedly asking “were you ever abused as a child?”
leading questions
“is there someone else in there that I can talk to?”
iatrogenesis
the creation of a disorder by an attempt to treat it
the power of suggestion and role-playing by therapists
DID epidemiology
unrelated to schizophrenia
5% including subclinical, 3.3% clinically
more commonly diagnosed in women
only seems to develop in adults
large increase in number of cases since the 80’s
increase of DID cases due to
increased awareness (popular media depicting someone with DID)
DID being under-diagnosed in the past
the power of suggestion and role-playing by therapists (iatrogenesis)
highly suggestible people being more prone to dissociative disorders
issues in DID prevalence
malingering: faking symptoms for personal gain (money, court case)
don’t show comorbid symptoms, seem to enjoy having the symptoms
people may fake DID to claim they aren’t responsible for a crime (rarely works)
factitious disorder
falsify or induce physical/psychological symptoms
present self as ill/injured
deceptive behavior evident in absence of obvious external rewards (financial gain, avoid legal problems)
diagnosis needs evidence of deliberate deception
person fabricates symptoms in themselves or imposed on another
treatment
anti-depressants and anti-anxiety medications reduce distress, not symptoms
main goal: integration (individuals’ identities will eventually become “fused” into one self)
treatment done through multiple phases (stabilization, treatment of traumatic memories, personality integration)
integration is not evidence-based treatment (bc DID is so rare)