APLC Logical Methods/Fallacies

5.0(1)
studied byStudied by 4 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/45

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

46 Terms

1
New cards

Statistics

Direct - the use of numerical data to support a position

2
New cards

Examples

Direct - the use of a specific case in order to build an argument

3
New cards

Anecdotes

Direct - the use of a specific case that is told in the form of a story in order to support a position

4
New cards

Quotes (expert)

Direct - the use of the exact words of a person or source who has expert knowledge in a relevant field in order to make a point.

5
New cards

Definitions

Direct - the use of a widely held and accepted source to confirm the meaning of key words in an argument

6
New cards

Simile

Indirect - an artistic comparison using "like" or "as"

7
New cards

Metaphor

Indirect - an artistic comparison without like or as

8
New cards

Analogy

Indirect - a literal comparison between two events or situations

9
New cards

Antithesis

Indirect - the use of opposites as evidence

10
New cards

Allusion

Indirect - a reference to a well-known person, place or event

11
New cards

Juxtaposition

Indirect - the pairing of two incompatible things

12
New cards

Rhetorical Questions

Guided Reasoning - the use of questions in a text or speech, usually answered by the speaker, to guide the reader towards a line of reasoning

13
New cards

Declared Priorities

Guided Reasoning - The author states that X is more important than Y without providing reasoning (a form of begging the question)

14
New cards

Declared Sequencing

Guided Reasoning - The author states that X must be addressed before Y providing reasoning (may beg the question and may stand to reason)

15
New cards

Induction

Organizational Structure - moving from many individual examples to a conclusion

16
New cards

Deduction

Organizational Structure - beginning from a stated premise and applying that premise to a special case

17
New cards

Narration

Organizational Structure - An argument posed as a story which leads to a point or lesson

18
New cards

Chronology

Organizational Structure - An argument in which a sequence of events is placed in time-order so as to lead to a conclusion

19
New cards

Cause-Effect

Organizational Structure - an argument that emphasizes the relationship between actions and their outcomes

20
New cards

Definition

Organizational Structure - an argument that asserts the fundamental meaning of a debated word or concept

21
New cards

Compare-Contrast

Organizational Structure - an argument structured upon the similarities and differences between two things

22
New cards

false equivalence

Fallacy - occurs when someone incorrectly asserts that two or more things are similar or the same, simply because they share some characteristics, despite the fact that there are also notable differences between them.

23
New cards

tu quoque

Fallacy - Latin for "you also" - is a discussion technique that intends to discredit the opponent's argument by attacking the opponent's own personal behavior and actions as being inconsistent with their argument, therefore accusing hypocrisy.

24
New cards

two wrongs make a right

Fallacy - When a person attempts to justify an action against another person because the other person did take or would take the same action against him or her.

25
New cards

circular logic

Fallacy - An argument that assumes the very thing it is trying to prove is true. Instead of offering evidence, it simply repeats the conclusion, rendering the argument logically incoherent.

26
New cards

burden of proof (aka appeal to ignorance)

Fallacy - when someone who is making a claim states that they are proven right if another party is unable to disprove what they are claiming.

27
New cards

appeal to incredulity

Fallacy - Because one finds something difficult to understand, it is therefore not true.

28
New cards

appeal to novelty

Fallacy - Supposing that something is better because it is newer.

29
New cards

stacking the deck (cherry picking)

Fallacy - Omission of examples that disprove the point and listing only those examples that support the argument, especially when the majority of evidence makes a contrary case.

30
New cards

"No True Scotsman"

Fallacy - Defining terms in such a narrow or unrealistic manner as to exclude or omit relevant examples from a sample.

31
New cards

perfectionist fallacy

Fallacy - Assuming that any argument that does not result in a perfect outcome disproves the validity of the argument.

32
New cards

Hasty Generalization

Fallacy - a conclusion reached prematurely without sufficient evidence. This often uses words such as "all," "every," "everyone," and "no".

33
New cards

Faulty Use of Authority

Fallacy - The arguer attempts to justify the claim by citing testimony or opinions of those who have little or no expertise in the field

34
New cards

False Causation (Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc)

Fallacy - The arguer suggests that because an event follows another event, it is therefore the cause of that event.

35
New cards

Attack Ad Hominem

Fallacy - When the writer attacks a person (personal character or reputation) instead of addressing the argument or the issue. This fallacy draws attention away from the real issues.

36
New cards

Black/White (Either/Or, False Dilemma)

Fallacy - This is when the arguer assumes that there are only two ways of looking at an issue.

37
New cards

Slippery Slope

Fallacy - The arguer predicts that one thing will inevitably lead to another that will be dramatic and undesirable. This is a cause-and-effect error that relies on simplistic, erroneous connections.

38
New cards

Begging the Question

Fallacy - The arguer makes an assertion as if she has already proven it. It lacks evidence.

39
New cards

Straw Man

Fallacy - In this diversionary tactic, the arguer attacks a view similar to but not the same as his opponent's view.

40
New cards

Non Sequitur

Fallacy - In Latin, "this does not follow". It is literally a nonsense argument.

41
New cards

Ad Populum

Fallacy - An appeal to the prejudices of the masses that asserts if many believe it, then it is so.

42
New cards

Bandwagon Effect

Fallacy - This fallacy is similar to Ad Populum, but relies on popularity or trendiness. If many people like something than it must be good.

43
New cards

Red Herring

Fallacy - This fallacy exists when the arguer throws out an unrelated argument to divert the reader's/listener's attention.

44
New cards

Appeal to Tradition

Fallacy - This fallacy is apparent when the arguer suggests a course of action that is correct "because we've always done it this way."

45
New cards

Appeal to Pathos

Fallacy - When the arguer seeks sensational or sentimental reactions in the audience; bases an argument on feelings (especially pity or fear).

46
New cards

Guilt by Association

Fallacy - Relies on prejudice instead of thought. When a person is negatively judged by the actions of those with whom he associates.