psych 102 Chap 1-4

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 6 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/179

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 2:29 AM on 10/6/23
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

180 Terms

1
New cards
Psychology
Scientific study of the mind, brain, and behavior
2
New cards
Levels of analysis in psychology

1. biological: molecular or neurochemical level, involves the brain and neurotransmitters.

2. psychological, mental level; involves thoughts, feelings, and emotions.

3. social/cultural influences; involves relating to observable environmental behaviours

3
New cards
Example of psych analysis levels: Depression

Bio: People who are depressed have lower levels of neurotransmitter that impacts their depression

Psychological: people who are depressed think negatively, causing them to feel down

Social: environment factors, (lost job, health problems, family problems).

4
New cards
Scientific theory
Explanation for a large number of findings in the natural world
5
New cards
Hypothesis
Testable prediction derived from a scientific theory
6
New cards
Confirmation bias
Tendency to seek evidence that supports our hypotheses and dismiss contradictory evidence
7
New cards
Belief perseverance
Tendency to stick to initial beliefs even when evidence contradicts them
8
New cards
Pseudoscience

Set of claims that seem scientific but are not

Examples: astrology, goop, diet/wellness industry, mind reading.

9
New cards
Metaphysical claims

Assertions about the world that cannot be tested

examples: life after death, religion, god

10
New cards
Dangers of pseudoscience

1- Opportunity cost: Forgoing effective treatments due to pseudoscience (collecting crystals because its therapeutic instead of going to a therapist).

2- Direct harm: Can cause psychological or physical harm- even death. (ex: rebirthing/conversion therapy)

3- inability to think scientifically as citizens; Need scientific thinking skills to reach education decision

11
New cards
Scientific skepticism
Approach of evaluating all claims with an open mind and insisting on persuasive evidence
12
New cards
Cynicism
Dismissal of claims without evaluation
13
New cards
Principle: Ruling out rival hypotheses

Excluding alternative explanations for findings; there are various explanations for findings.

example: thought field therapy for anxiety, TFT works better than nothing, but therapy also treats anxiety.

14
New cards
Principle: Correlation-causation fallacy
Error of assuming that because one thing is associated with another, it must cause the other.
15
New cards
Variable
Anything that can vary in a study; height, age, weight, IQ, anxiety levels, etc...
16
New cards
Falsifiability
Capable of being disproven
17
New cards
Extraordinary claims

Claims that contradict what is already known and require strong evidence - David Hume

Ex: big foot exists, aliens! etc..

18
New cards
Occam's Razor (aka "Principle of Parsimony")

Principle of selecting the simpler explanation when multiple explanations are possible.

- by 14th-century British philosopher and monk, Sir William of Occam.

19
New cards
Psychology in popular culture
Learning about psychology from media and entertainment
20
New cards
Common sense
Useful for some purposes but can be wrong in psychology
21
New cards
Burglar alarms and increased burglary risk
Example of an non-obvious finding in psychology
22
New cards
Individual differences
Variations in thinking, emotion, personality, and behavior, gender, age, ethnicity, among people
23
New cards
Reciprocal determinism
bidirectional influence. Example: boy impacted by his environment, boy impacts his environment.
24
New cards
Anecdote
A single person's story that lacks generalizability
25
New cards

Warning sign- Meaningless psychobabble

Using scientific-sounding words that have no real meaning

26
New cards

Warning sign- Proof vs evidence

science uses evidence to support or contradict claims: future research should use: "suggests", "appears", "raises the possibility that."

27
New cards
Scientific thinking skills
Skills needed to evaluate psychological claims and make informed decisions
28
New cards
Overreliance on anecdotes
Relying too heavily on individual stories as evidence
29
New cards
Talk of proof instead of evidence
Claiming absolute proof instead of providing scientific evidence
30
New cards
Five major challenges in Psychology

1- Actions are multiply determined

2- Psych influences are rarely independent:

3- Individual differences among people

4-People influence one another through reciprocal determinism

5- Behavior is shaped by culture

31
New cards
gave an example to "Actions are multiply determined"

Ex #1: Child's IQ in India.

can be affected by brain activity, parents education levels, and learning abilities etc...

32
New cards
Give an example to "Psych influences are rarely independent"
Example: anorexia. a lot of variables are highly related to each other that cause this, body image issues, social media, compulsive exercise, gender, etc..
33
New cards

Give an example to "Individual differences among people"

Everyone is different in terms of thinking emotions, personality and behaviours

34
New cards

Give an example to "People influence one another through reciprocal determinism"

personal factor: child doesn't enjoy school. Environmental: Teacher makes child sit alone. Behaviour: Acts out in class.

35
New cards

Given an example to "Behaviour is shaped by culture"

Ex: Takahiko Masuda study (eye tracking).

results: Japanese looked more at background expressions (collectivist society)

Americans looked more at middle character's expression (individualistic society)

36
New cards

2 types of biases

1- confirmation bias: seeks out evidence that advances self-interest while ignoring contradicting evidence.

2- Belief perseverance: sticking with beliefs even when acknowledging other evidence contradicts them.

37
New cards
proponent of Mind-Body Problem?
René Descartes
38
New cards

Concept of Mind-Body Problem

Some human behaviour is mechanistic. (physical body)

Proposed the idea of dualism= mind/body are separate.

Mind and body interacted at the pineal gland.

39
New cards

A Modern-Day Mind vs. Body Research Example

Lorina Naci, Adrian Owen:

  • healthy vs brain injured patients watch climax clip.

  • results- vegetative patient had similar brain activity reaction as normal patient.

  • moral of study: mind is different to study

40
New cards
proponent of Reaction time experiment?
Franciscus Donders
41
New cards
Donder's Reaction Time Experiment
Reaction Time (RT): How long it takes to respond to a stimulus.
42
New cards

what are two types of reaction times? How to calculate Decision time?

1- Simple reaction time: press "J" when lights on

2- Choice Reaction Time: Pres "J" for right, "K" for left

(Choice RT- Simple RT = Decision time)

43
New cards

What did Wilhelm Wundt establish in Leipzig, Germany, in 1879, and what was its significance for psychology?

  • Wilhelm Wundt established the first psychology laboratory in Leipzig, Germany.

  • scientific methods for studying consciousness.

  • Wundt's lab explored questions about sensory perception, reaction times, and the process of introspection

44
New cards
What is Structuralism in psychology, and who was its proponent?
Structuralism, led by Edward Titchener, wanted to find the basic building blocks of the mind using introspection.
45
New cards

Problems with Structuralism

  1. Reports were subjective.

  2. Imageless thought.

46
New cards

Lasting Scientific Influence of Structuralism

Correctly emphasized the importance of systematic observation.

Wundt's methods used qualitative and quantitative data.

47
New cards

Ebbinghaus' memory experiment

  • repeated nonsense syllables to himself, until no errors

  • Took him 1,000 seconds to learn a list for the first time. After a break, he relearned the list.

48
New cards

William James (functionalism)

  • understanding why we think and behave the way we do.

  • our thoughts and actions help us adapt to our surroundings and solve problems.

  • looks at the bigger picture of how our mind works in real life.

49
New cards
True or False: Structuralists asked "what" questions. Functionalists asked "why" questions.
True
50
New cards
Who is the founder of behaviorism?
John B Watson
51
New cards
What is Behaviourism?
objectively focuses on the idea that all behaviors are learned through interaction with the environment
52
New cards
What is B.F Skinner Known For?
examined operant conditioning (rewards & punishments)
53
New cards
What Area did Watson Focus on in Behaviourism?
classical conditioning "little albert"
54
New cards

What findings did Tolman contribute?

  • Trained rats to find food in a four-armed maze.

  • Tolman believed the rat created a cognitive map, a representation of the maze in its mind.

55
New cards

Cognitive Psychology

The study of mental processes.

56
New cards
Proponent to cognitive psychology
Jean Piaget- "children think in different ways than adults."
57
New cards
cognitive neuroscience
Examines the relationship between brain activity and thinking.
58
New cards

Psychoanalysis

  • Focuses on internal psychological processes of which we are unaware.

  • Strong role of childhood experiences

59
New cards
Unconscious mind (Freud)
contains thoughts, memories, and desires below the surface of conscious awareness.
60
New cards

"Freudian Slips"

a verbal memory mistake linked to unconscious mind.

61
New cards
criticism of psychoanalysis
Difficult to falsify.
62
New cards

Lasting Influence: of Psychoanalysis

Importance of childhood development.

The idea that some processing is unconscious.

e.g., biases, priming

63
New cards
Humanism
emphasizes the unique qualities of humans, especially their freedom and their potential for personal growth
64
New cards

Abraham Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs concludes that:

Psychological disorders result from hindering of human needs.

65
New cards

Modern Psychology:

  • women outnumber men in psychology graduate programs

  • need for more ethnic diversity

66
New cards
Evolutionary Psychology
Applies Darwin's theory of natural selection to human and animal behaviour.
67
New cards

Mating Strategies Study (evolutionary)

Bressler and Balshine (2006) Humour Study

  • females attracted to humours male, males did not care about females humor.

  • humor is seens as being more socially adaptable/resourceful

68
New cards

Why do we need Research Methods?

  • gives legitimacy to scientific claim

  • Understanding our data better

  • Prevent people from wasting time on ineffective treatments

69
New cards
Research methodology
is a way to systematically solve or answer a research problem.
70
New cards
Selection of the research method is crucial for
what conclusions you can make.
71
New cards

Guiding Principle 1- External validity (generalizability)

Refers to whether the results of a study can be generalized to other situations and other people.

  • Need a representative sample of the population.

  • Population depends on the research question.

72
New cards
"WEIRD" Samples
Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) societies represented ~80% of the study participants.
73
New cards
Random Selection
A way of ensuring that a sample of people is representative of a population by giving everyone in the population an equal chance of being selected for the sample
74
New cards

Non-random selection reduces the generalizability of studies

ex: How does the average person feel about Drake?

Should we ask 100 randomly sampled people in North America or 100,000 people in Toronto?

75
New cards
Guiding Principle 2- reliability
Reliability- Consistency of measurement.
76
New cards
interrater reliability
the amount of agreement in the observations of different raters who witness the same behavior
77
New cards
Guiding Principle 3- validity
Validity (Construct Validity)- Extent to which a measure assesses what it claims to measure.
78
New cards

Difference between Reliability vs Validity

For a test to be good and trustworthy (valid), it must first be consistent and dependable (reliable).

Just because a test is consistent and dependable (reliable), it doesn't necessarily mean it measures what it's supposed to measure accurately (valid).

79
New cards

Naturalistic Observation

observing and recording behavior in naturally occurring situations without trying to manipulate the situation

80
New cards

Pros of Naturalistic Observation Studies

High in external validity.

Good starting point.

Can be used to study animal behavior.

81
New cards
Cons of Naturalistic Observation Studies
Cannot draw cause-and-effect inferences
82
New cards
Case Studies
Examine one person or a small number of people in great detail, usually studies rare conditions.
83
New cards

Pros and Cons of Case Studies

pros: in-depth view; compelling evidence to support theory

cons: can be less than objective (because interviewer is interpreting); may be an unusual case that can't be generalized

84
New cards
self-report measures
a method of gathering data about people by asking them questions about a sample of their behavior
85
New cards
Surveys
Questionnaires and interviews that ask people directly about their experiences, attitudes, or opinions.
86
New cards

Survey Challenges

Acquiring valid survey data is not easy.

Some people lie, some change their minds.

Survey answers are influenced by the wording and the sequence of the questions.

87
New cards

Pros and cons of self-report measures

pros: quantitative response, easier to get large sample size, interactive data collection (interviews)

cons: accuracy of responses

88
New cards
Correlational Designs
studies that measure two or more variables and their relationship to one another; not designed to show causation
89
New cards

Illusory Correlations

statistical relationships that really exist only in the mind, rather than in reality (ex: traffic whenever I have to be somewhere important)

90
New cards
Experimental Designs
a group of approaches that allow inferences about causes and effects to be drawn (internal validity)
91
New cards

random assignment

assigning participants to experimental and control conditions, minimizing differences between groups.

92
New cards
Within-subject Design
in an experiment, each participant acts as his or her own control
93
New cards

independent vs dependent variable

IV: variable that is changed or controlled in an experiment to test the effects on the dependent variable.

DV: variable being tested and measured in a scientific experiment.

94
New cards

Confounding Variables

Variables of environment or participants which may influence data/dependent variable

95
New cards
placebo effect
the phenomenon in which the expectations of the participants in a study can influence their behavior
96
New cards
experimenter expectancy effect
actual change in the behavior of the people or nonhuman animals being observed that is due to the expectations of the observer
97
New cards

Double blind designs

neither the experimenter nor the participants know who received a placebo or an active treatment

98
New cards
Demand Characteristics (Hawthorne Effect)
when participants act differently simply because they know that they are in an experiment (horror movies impact on mood)
99
New cards
Reactivity
tendency of participants to change their behavior when they know that they are being observed.
100
New cards

Social Desirability Bias

Our tendency to respond in ways that we feel are more appropriate or socially acceptable to others

Explore top flashcards