A Level Law Paper 2 Contributory Negligence Cases
Studied by 0 people
Call Kai
Learn
Practice Test
Spaced Repetition
Match
Flashcards
Knowt Play1/5
There's no tags or description
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
6 Terms
Sayers v Harlow UDC
C’s negligence claim was reduced by 25% because she tried to escape the locked toilet in an unsafe way which partly led to her injury
Jayers v IMI
C lost a finger at work while cleaning a machine with the guard off and was found to be 100% contributorily negligent because he took the guard off
Froom v Butcher
Driver not wearing a seatbelt had his damages reduced by 20%
Stinton v Stinton
D’s damages were reduced by 1/3 for accepting a lift from a drunk driver
Badger v MOD
C got lung cancer from being exposed to asbestos by his employer D but had his damages reduced by 20% for being a smoker
O’Connell v Jackson
Damages reduced by 15% for a moped rider not wearing a crash helmet
Note 
Flashcards (50)