1/68
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
commissures
lateralization and asymmetry of hemispheres
large bundles of nerve fibers that pass neural messages from one hemisphere to another
corpus callosum
largest commissure
commissurotomy
surgical severing of commissures
ex: split-brain patients
Hoppe (1998)
split-brain studies bearing on creativity
commisurotomy patients
instigated how much the affect (feeling/experience of emotion) split-brain patients experience when shown an emotional film (ex imply child being kidnapped)
Hoppe (1988) results
split-brain patients were different from controls
had no affect—used unemotional terms (alexithymia)
described their reactions with episodic details
“dull, uninvolved, flat, lacking in expressiveness”
focused on the basic sequence of events, not the meaning of what was going on (ex didn’t comment on the significance of the empty swing)
takeaway: creativity involved both hemispheres to some degree
alexithymia
lack of emotional awareness, emotional relating, and social attachment
difficulty distinguishing, identifying, and appreciating emotions
difficulty describing feelings to other people
decreased imaginal processes (ex scarcity of fantasies)
have difficulty being creative
don’t get very excited about opportunities/challenges and aren’t interested of motivated to think creatively, solve problems, etc.
TenHouten (1994)
split-brain patients (and controls) watched 3-minute film portraying (with images and background music) death of baby and boy
subjects asked questions about the film, and asked to write 4 sentences expressing what they felt about the film
TenHouten (1994) results
split-brain patients more alexithymic than control subjects
used few affect-laden words and relatively few adjectives, with languages that was flat, dull, uninvolved, lacking in expression
less likely to consider/imagine symbols in the film
lacking creativity in split-brain subjects’’ verbal production
again enforcing idea that creativity appears to involve interaction of both hemispheres, based on evidence that split-brain patients seem to show impairments to creativity
dominant hemisphere
handedness and hemisphericity
the hemisphere that tends to be more active while performing certain cognitive functions
researchers have sometimes used a person’s handedness as an indicator of hemispheric dominance
in general, haven’t been many differences found in creativity of left vs right-handers
Burke et al (1989)
gave both visual and verbal divergent thinking tasks to left-handers and right-handers
results:
left-handers did slightly better on 4 visual tests of divergent thinking (only one was significant)
no difference in verbal divergent thinking tests
conclusions:
in creative activities where lefties have an advantage, it may be because they’ve developed a creative “coping” skill from having to adjust to “right-handed” environments (right-handed classroom desks, etc.)
may contribute to their flexibility and creative thinking
Peterson and Lansky (1977)
creative difference between lefties and righties in creative populations
looked at University of Cincinnati architecture program
results
29% of faculty left-handed (compared to ~10% in general pop.)
left-handers perform better in program than right-handers
in general, more left-handers apply to architecture schools
looking ad handedness is not a direct measure of brain function, it is only inferred based on their dominant hand — the usefulness of this information regarding lateralization is limited
Martindale and Hasenfus (1978)
EEG Studies and Creativity
took EEG readings of 12 creative-writing students as they went though phases of story-writing activity:
waiting for study to begin
during a 3-minute inspiration period period (thinking about what they would write)
while actually writing the story (elaboration place)
students had been rated in creativity by their creative writing professor
asked to make up a story about a man who meets a woman and asks her out
asked to use their imagination and make up a story of who the man and woman are, how they met, and what will happen
specifically asked to be creative and original
Martindale and Hausenfus (1978) results
EEG Studies and Creativity
highly-creative writers: had higher alpha activity (brain waves in the 8-12 Hz range) during the inspiration phase than during the elaboration phase
less creative writers: no difference in EEG activity during any of the phases of the process
Martindale and Hausenfus (1978): Experiment 2
EEG Studies and Creativity
16 subjects performed similar (fantasy) story-writing task, except….
creativity measured by RAT
researchers varied whether or not subjects were specifically told to be creative and original
Martindale and Hausenfus (1978): Experiment 2 results
found the same increase in alpha activity during inspiration phase for highly-creative subjects, but only when they were instructed to be creative and original
no difference when NOT instructed to be creative, regardless of subject creativity level
= evidence of change of brain activity when creative thinking (as compared to non-creative thinking) is going on!
when someone highly creative is trying to be creative
Martindale et al (1986)
EEG Studies of Creativity
investigated differences in EEG activity when one is involved in primary process thinking compared to secondary process thinking
studies suggest that creative people employ more primary process thinking and that there is higher level of primary process content in the fantasy narratives of more creative subjects (as opposed to less creative subjects)
researchers recorded EEG activity as subjects wrote a fantasy story
researchers also evaluated stories in terms of primary process content (using the regressive imagery dictionary)
primary process cognition
studied in Martindale et al (1986)
Freud
irrational, free associative, perceptual thinking
present in children, dreaming, and psychotic states
secondary process cognition
studied in Martindale et al (1986)
Freud
logical, realistic
normal, waking consciousness in adults
regressive imagery dictionary
used in Martindale et al (1986) to test primary process content
identifies words and phrases that are indicative of primary process thinking
Martindale et al (1986) results
EEG Studies of Creativity
theory: primary process cognition is related to a pattern of greater right-hemisphere activation than left-hemisphere activation
results:
basal asymmetry (creative right-hemisphere activation than left-hemisphere activation) in subjects whose narratives contained more primary process content
basal = baseline, rather than short-term like in the 5 minute task
researchers has predicted that the hemispheric asymmetry to occur during the short-term inspirational phase, in particular, but he asymmetry only showed up in basal, more stable long-term EEG measures
conclusion:
authors suggest that people who have high-level of right-hemisphere (as opposed to left-hemisphere) activation tend to think in a more “primary process” way
Carlsson, Wendt, and Risberg (2000)
Prefrontal Cortex in Creativity
had high-creativity and low-creativity subjects perform creativity tests (“uses” tests)
results:
high-creativity people show bilateral increase in brain activity in various areas of the prefrontal cortex (compared to low-creativity subjects)
prefrontal cortex (PFC)
enables such high-level cognitive functions as the self-construct, self-reflective consciousness, willed action, planning, abstract thinking, and much more
three basic functions:
working memory
temporal integration
sustained and directed attention
dorsolateral PFC
higher in PFC, to the side
left function: semantic memory retrieval
right function: sustained attention
general connection: heavily connected with temporal, occipital and parietal regions of the cortex
involved in deliberate creativity (Dietrich 2004)
ventromedial PFC
lower, to the middle
general connections: heavily connected to limbic system (amygdala and cingulate cortex)
Dietrich (2004)
Prefrontal Cortex in Creativity
dorsolateral PFC is important for deliberate creativity
deliberate creativity involves effortful, constructive problem solving and depends on ability to deliberately direct attention to relevant information and access information from semantic memory
spontaneous creativity primarily due to activation in temporal, occipital, parietal in absence of directed attention, searching, and accessing memories
deliberate creative thinking seems to be vitally dependent on PFC’s network involved in focusing attention and on consciousness and ability to hold relevant content (working memory!) long enough for a creative solution to occur
deliberate creativity
studied in Dietrich (2004)
involves deliberately focusing attention on problem and putting effort into coming up with a creative solution
dorsolateral PFC
spontaneous creativity
studied in Dietrich (2004)
occurs during periods of de-focused attention (i.e. insight)
temporal, occipital, parietal
ventromedial PFC
Prefrontal Cortex, Creativity, and Social Judgment of Appropriateness
deficits associated with lesions in this areaL
inappropriate social behaviors, lack of moral judgment
lowered social inhibitions, showing little concern for self/others
showing little regard for social restraints
Q: creative people are often described as eccentric, nonconformist, radical, socially inappropriate often, etc….might damage to this area be beneficial to creativity…?
A: NO
unconventional tendencies of creative people tend to be intentional and controllable. They know what they’re doing when they’re being unconventional—they are aware of social convention, they aren’t that concerned with it
= creativity doesnt lack judgment, it actually requires it
cerebellum
might make significant contributions to creativity
involved in general timing and sequencing, not just with motor processes, but with cognitive processes as well (including those of working memory)
Ito (1997)
The Cerebellum and Creativity
explained how cerebellum manipulates ideas in similar way to how it manipulates motor control'
ideas/concepts are manipulated just like limbs are in movement (ex: mentally arranging furniture is similar to actually controlling limbs to accomplish same thing)
when we repeatedly perform mental manipulations — just like with physical actions, the cerebellum works to make those manipulations smoother, faster, and more efficient
cerebellum and PFC
researchers believe that the cerebellum would be useful in processing novel situation requiring creative/innovative solutions
in processing a novel situation, a person may need to engage in preliminary processing before taking action (processing potential consequences), which activates working memory in PFC
via numerous parallel connections with cerebellum, this information in working memory can be processed very rapidly and a quick decision could be made
Flaherty (2005)
Emotions and Creative Drive
proposed a model of creativity focusing on the interaction of:
frontal lobes
temporal lobes
limbic system
proposed link between creative drive and hypergraphia and mania
suggests that alterations in functions of amygdala may cause the passionate interests in manic patients
high “goal-directness” of creative arousal may be driven by the mesolimbic dopaminergic pathway
“reward pathway” — involved in all kinds of reward seeking activity (ex gambling, cocaine addiction, appreciation of beauty, etc.)
= emotions play a role in creative drive, particularly the limbic system (especially the amygdala and mesolimbic pathway
hypergraphia
compulsive drive to write
associated with decrease in temporal lobe activity (most commonly, a lesion to the right temporal lobe)
temporal lobe regulated creative drive
the equilibrium between right and left temporal lobes is disrupted, causing disinhibition of left-hemisphere language-related activity
drive ≠ skill
disinhibition
weakening of restraint against performing actions
symptoms are similar to mania—most hypergraphics have mania, which is associated with increased creativity
temporal lobes seem to be involved in creative drive (or suppression!)
darwinian model
along with practice effect, is a way that creative drive can help increase creative skill/ability
if someone is driven to produce more ideas or creative works, more novel, original, or useful ideas will be created
subjects who come up with the best ideas will usually be subjects who are most driven … creative skill is less important
evidence:
Threshold Theory
for people who are above the IQ threshold for creativity, creativity is more dependent on the brain’s motivational systems than on the person’s creative “skill”
bipolar disorder
The Limbic System and Creative Drive
psychological disorder most associated with creativity
patients typically show increase in creativity with manic phase
associated with enlargement of amygdala (emotional center of the brain)
Snyder et al (2003)
Manipulations of the Human Brain
used TMS to simulate temporary lesions of left fronto-temporal lobe
fronto-temporal implicated in savant syndrome in young artistic savants and savants who emerge late in life due to front-termporal lobe dementia
eleven subjects given drawing and proofreading tasks performed before, during, and after TMS
Snyder et al (2003) results
drawing results:
4/11 subjects showed stylistic changes in their drawings
judges described post-TMS drawings as more lifelike, flamboyant, and complex than before
three subjects also reported altered states of perception — feeling more alert and conscious of detail
subjects’ drawings did not revert back to original pre-TMS style after 45 minutes = altered perceptual state persisted
proofreading results
savants often described as atypically LITERAL — tend to concentrate on parts than on whole, allowing them to see world in a less-biased light
= better proofreaders
subjects looked for grammatical errors in short proverbs
two subjects also showed improvement in proofreading after TMS
TMS caused impairment at left front-temporal lobe leading to savant-like ability to see details of the PARTS and not be fooled by what they expected to see
explanation:
in normal brain, the conceptual networks concerned with meaning tend to inhibit networks concerned with detail
by inhibiting these networks, it may facilitate
more evidence of role of temporal lobe in creativity—impeding the activity of temporal lobes can change level of detail we are conscious of, leading to increase of certain creative abilities
Norlander & Gustafson (1998)
Altered States and Brain Function
investigated effects of alcohol on divergent thinking
subjects given “uses” task under one of three conditions:
control (no alcohol)
alcohol-influenced (.08 blood-alcohol level)
placebo
results
increased originality scores in alcohol group
decreased flexibility in alcohol group
no significant effect in fluency
no effect on creativity by lower alcohol levels (.05 BAC)
conclusion:
under moderate doses of alcohol, people have slightly more original ideas, but are less flexible, not shifting their thinking as much when they are sober
West (1983)
Altered States and Brain Function
effect of marijuana on creativity
subjects wrote stories after looking at picture from Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)
subjects wrote a story first without being under the influence, then wrote story with marijuana or placebo
stories analyzed with Regressive Imagery Dictionary (for primary process content)
ID words and phrases indicative of primary process thinking
results
marijuana group wrote stories with higher primary process content than control subjects, and individuals more primary process content when under the influence of marijuana than when not
Bourassa and Vaugeois (2001)
Altered States and Brain Function
compared creativity effects of marijuana on regular (3x/week) vs novice (never) users
results (contradict West 1983
novices: no effect on divergent thinking
regular users: decreased divergent thinking
Weckowitz et al (1975)
investigated dosage of marijuana
low doses = enhanced creativity
higher doses = inhibited creativity
overall, effects may differ from person-to-person, and task-to-task
Nichols (1978)
Genetics and Creativity
reviewed 10 twin studies of divergent thinking
average correlation of divergent thinking scores for identical twins = .61
average correlation of divergent thinking scores for fraternal twins = .51
all together, about 22% of variation in divergent thinking scores due to influence of genes
Weller et al (1993)
Genetics and Creativity
evaluated data from 45 pairs of MZ twins reared apart, one set of identical triplets reared apart, and 32 pairs of DZ reared apart
subjects completed 30-item Creative Personality Scale
Results:
correlation for MZ twins = .54
correlation for DZ twins = -.06
conclusion:
higher-order traits that emerge from interaction among a cluster of more fundamental traits
not likely to run in family ; unlikely for relatives to share (or even a large percentage of) the necessary components of the trait cluster
creativity is highly influenced by genes, but tends not to run in families
affect
experience/feeling of emotion
Andreasen (1997)
Affective Disorders
investigated 30 creative writers (university faculty)
gave structured interviews to see patterns of creativity and determine history of mental illness
compared to control group matched for age, sex, educational level, but having varied occupations (lawyers, social workers, etc)
Andreasen (1997) results
Affective Disorders
strikingly high incidence of affective disorders in sample of writers
Ludwig (1995)
Creativity & Mental Illness Link
“The Price of Greatness”
investigated creativity/mental illness link (over 1000 eminent subjects)
Ludwig (1995) results
Depression highest in poets (77%), fiction writers (59%), artists (50%), non-fiction writers (47%), and composers (46%) … all artistic types
artistic types (architecture, theater, art, music, writers/poets): 50% had depression
social types (sports, social activism, social figure, companion): 27%
investigative types (natural/social sciences): 24%
enterprising types (business, exploration, military, public office): 20%
mania highest in actors (17%), poets (13%), architects (13%), and nonfiction writers (11%)
artistic types: 10% mania
investigative types: 0% mania
physical energy and creativity
connections between affective disorders and creativity
when a person is depressed they have little energy
in manic episodes, the person has a lot of energy and is often highly productiv
mood swing effects on creativity
a writer with bipolar disorder may write a LOT in manic phase, but in depressed phase may be unhappy with what they’ve written, scrap a lot from manic phase
it may take a long time to finish a book, but they may need up with something good since they are acting as their own editor during depression
creativity as catharsis for depression
keeping busy with creative efforts may offer an “escape” from depressed feelings
immersion in work and depression
focusing one’s life on their creative work may lead them to be consumed always, leaving little time for anything else
= possible depression
Hirt (1999)
General Effect of Mood on Creativity
review of studies on research and creativity
findings
people in positive mood states consistently show higher creativity than people in other mood states, regardless of method of inducing positive mood and particular type of creative task
mood and creativity
Repost Associates Test, Insight Problems, and word association tasks show that…
neutral mood = more obvious associations
positive mood = more creative associations
over inclusive thought
How might positive mood increase creativity?
excessive activation of semantic memory, activating even weakly-associated ideas
effects:
loosens conceptual boundaries, leading to inclusion of things in categories that other people probably wouldn’t
ex: including horse, elevator, etc. when naming vehicles
also includes original word associations, broader range of options, increase in ideational associations
Kaufmann and Vosburg (1997)
Might Positive Mood Impair Creativity
subjects solved two insight problems (two-string problem/hat rack problem)
subjects categorized by mood (positive, negative, neutral)
results
positive mood did NOT enhance subjects’ ability to solve problems
positive-mood subjects were outperformed by negative/neutral-mood subjects
= positive mood detrimental in constrained solution requirements (where many idea options have been exhausted)
Kaufman and Vosburg (2002)
Might Positive Mood Impair Creativity?
subjects induced into positive, negative ,or neutral mood
subjects performed 4 divergent thinking tasks and performance recorded across 4-minute interval
results (depends on how long working on a. problem)
positive mood led to more ideas early on
after having produced a number of ideas, negative and neutral moods seemed to do better
= positive mood beneficial in unconstrained solution requirements (when most idea options are still available)
Nicol and Long (1996)
Stress: Creativity as a Coping Mechanism
investigated music hobbyists and music therapists
collected scored on various creative thinking measures and recorded subject stress level with perceived stress scale (measured degree to which person’s life situations in past month are perceived as stressful
Nicol and Long (1996) results
hobbyists: significant correlation between high creativity and low levels of stress
therapists: no difference in stress levels between high- and low-creativity thinkers
conclusion
the two groups might have different coping resources available
music therapists have training in psychology that may expose them to a broader range of coping strategies
music hobbyists may depend more on stress relief of creative endeavors since they have fewer coping resources to draw from
stressful events
not the event themselves that affect one’s mental health, but how they perceive, experience, and cope with the events
diff personality traits more/less susceptible to different interpretation of events
one of the traits associated with creative individuals is sensitivity, and this may lead creative people to be more prone to stressful interpretations of events
no real environmental stressors, only potential stressors
whether they cause stress depends on the person’s interpretation of the events
Ludwig (1995)
alcoholism and drug abuse
60% of people in theater likely had alcoholism
fiction writers: 41%
musicians: 40%
low…military, natural sciences, social sciences, social activism: under 10%
36% of musicians engaged in drug abuse
theater: 25%
fiction writers: 19%
poetry writers: 17%
rare/absent…explorers, sports, military
Norlander and Gustafson (1996-1998)
investigated effect of alcohol consumption on different phases of creative process
subjects divided into alcohol, placebo, and control groups
incubation phase
wednesday:
subjects asked to plan an experiment to investigate relative importance of heredity and environment
immediately gave possible ideas and anything coming to mind about the task
subject given pocket-sized notebook with pen attached and told to think about this problem for next 2 days, writing down every idea that came to them
alcohol/placebo group: given 2 bottles of liquid (alcohol or placebo) to drink on Wednesday night and Thursday night just before bed
friday
subject describes experiment plan and researchers collect their notebooks
panel of judges rate scientific value/creativity of ideas in journal, counting the frequency of times they wrote ideas that were modifications of previous ideas measure of incubation
Norlander and Gustafson (1996-1998) results
alcohol group produced more frequent/original incubations than other groups
on Thursday/F mornings, they were more likely to write down incubations that occurred while sleeping or really in the morning (likely still under the influence)
= alcohol is related to improved incubation
Norlander and Gustafson (1997)
alcohol and verification
subjects created basic sketch based on poem they read
drank alcohol (or not), given chance to finalize sketch with details, colors, etc. (verification stage)
panel of judges rated handicraft at finishing up the sketches
results
alcohol = poor verification (but enhanced incubation)
compare to Norlander and Gustafson 1998, where alcohol is related to…
increased originality
decreased flexibility
UNRELATED to fluency
Eysenck (2003)
psychosis and psychoticism
people high in psychoticism will exhibit some qualities commonly found in psychotics and may be more susceptible to becoming psychotic in certain environments
related to psychoticism: over inclusive thought
can lead to psychosis, but person will often have benefits of over inclusive thoughts without the psychosis
a person high in psychoticism will have a tendency toward over inclusive thought, but not necessarily to the degree that they are considered psychotic
psychoticism
personality dimension related to…
risk-taking / recklessness / impulsiveness
disregard for common sense
non-conformist behavior
inappropriate emotional expression
Eysenck
believed that…
creative people and psychotic people score high in psychoticism
does NOT mean that psychosis produces creativity, or that creative people are psychotic
main ideas
high psychoticism is necessary for creativity
people high in psychoticism may develop psychosis during their lives
psychotics have original thinking, but so original that it is unrealistic and therefore NOT creative thought
there may be genetic basis for psychoticism, since high levels of creativity have been found in descendants of psychotic parents