Unit 6: Pretrial (3) - motions and the suppression of evidence

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 1 person
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/19

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

20 Terms

1
New cards

pretrial motion

A request filed by either party for a specific ruling by the judge.

2
New cards

motion to dismiss

Requests the judge to throw out the case

3
New cards

motion for a change of venue

request to move the trial to another location

4
New cards

motion for discovery

request for the release of evidence to the defense

5
New cards

Brady rule

Prosecutors must disclose evidence material to guilt or punishment

6
New cards

motion to suppress evidence

Exclusion of certain evidence from trial

7
New cards

Fourth Amendment

protects unreasonable searches and seizures by government agents

8
New cards

What defines a "search" under the Fourth Amendment?

Intrusion into a reasonable expectation of privacy

9
New cards

What is the "third-party doctrine"?

No expectation of privacy for shared information with service providers

10
New cards

What constitutes an "open field"?

Private land distant from the home without privacy protection.

11
New cards

What is "plain view" doctrine?

Objects visible from public areas can be seized without a warrant.

12
New cards

What is required for a search warrant?

Probable cause based on a sworn officer’s affidavit.

13
New cards

What are exigent circumstances?

Situations allowing warrantless searches to prevent evidence destruction

14
New cards

What is the exclusionary rule?

Unlawfully obtained evidence is usually inadmissible in court.

15
New cards

What is "fruit of the poisonous tree"?

Evidence derived from unlawfully obtained items, also inadmissible

16
New cards

What is the "good faith" exception?

Evidence may be admissible if police acted reasonably

17
New cards

doctrine of inevitable discovery

Evidence is admissible if it would have been found lawfully

18
New cards

doctrine of attenuation

Evidence may be admitted if the connection to unconstitutional conduct is remote

19
New cards

confession

dmission of guilt that can be used as evidence in court

20
New cards

Mapp v. Ohio (1961)

extended the exclusionary rule to state courts