Poli-Sci Mid-Term Exam

5.0(1)
studied byStudied by 62 people
5.0(1)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/64

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

65 Terms

1
New cards
Burden of proof in a criminal case
Beyond a reasonable doubt
2
New cards
Burden of proof in a civil case
Preponderance of evidence (more likely than not)
3
New cards
Who files a criminal case
The government (prosecution)
4
New cards
Who files a civil case
An individual or entity (plaintiff)
5
New cards
Punishment in a criminal case
Jail time, fines, or probation
6
New cards

Punishment in a civil case

Financial compensation or payment

7
New cards
Rights of the accused in a criminal case
Miranda rights, legal representation
8
New cards
Rights of the accused in a civil case
No guaranteed legal representation
9
New cards
Who decides the verdict in a criminal case
Jury or judge
10
New cards
Who decides the verdict in a civil case
Judge (or jury in some cases)
11
New cards

What is the Constitution?

The supreme law of the United States, written by James Maddison.

12
New cards

What does the Bill of Rights do?

Protects individual freedoms and limits government power

13
New cards

What does the Establishment Clause do?

Prevents the government from establishing an official religion
14
New cards

Who said there should be a "wall of separation between Church and State"?

Thomas Jefferson
15
New cards

What does the Free Exercise Clause do?

Protects individuals' rights to practice their religion freely
16
New cards
Justice Hugo Black (1962)
Strongly supported separation of church and state
17
New cards
Justice Anthony Kennedy (1993)
Often ruled on free speech and religious freedom cases
18
New cards
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes (1929)
Known for free speech decisions, including the "clear and present danger" test
19
New cards
Justice Abe Fortas (1969)
Wrote the majority opinion in Tinker v. Des Moines, defending student free speech
20
New cards
Prior restraint
Government action that prevents speech before it happens
21
New cards
Grand jury
A group that decides if there is enough evidence to indict someone
22
New cards
Precedent
A legal decision that influences future cases
23
New cards
Slander
Spoken false statements that harm someone's reputation
24
New cards
Libel
Written false statements that harm someone's reputation
25
New cards
Indictment
A formal charge by a grand jury
26
New cards
Preponderance of evidence
Standard of proof in civil cases (more than 50% likely)
27
New cards
All deliberate speed
The vague timeline set for desegregation after Brown v. Board of Education
28
New cards
Bench trial
A trial with no jury, where the judge decides the verdict
29
New cards
Bicameral
A two-house legislature (e.g., U.S. Congress)
30
New cards
False advertising
Misleading information in ads
31
New cards
Sovereignty
Supreme power or authority
32
New cards
Amicus curiae
"Friend of the court" brief filed by a third party to provide additional information
33
New cards
Obscene words

Language not protected under free speech (sexual innuendo)

34
New cards
Federal
A system where power is shared between national and state governments
35
New cards
Incorporation
The process of applying the Bill of Rights to the states
36
New cards
Hung jury
A jury that cannot reach a unanimous verdict
37
New cards
Plaintiff
The person who brings a case to court in a civil lawsuit
38
New cards
Beyond a reasonable doubt
The standard of proof in a criminal case
39
New cards
Misdemeanor
A minor crime, usually punished with fines or jail time under one year
40
New cards
Felony
A serious crime, usually punished with more than a year in prison
41
New cards
Symbolic speech
Actions that express opinions without words (e.g., flag burning)
42
New cards
Three-Fifths Compromise
A historical agreement that counted enslaved people as 3/5 of a person for representation purposes
43
New cards
"Separate but equal"
Doctrine established in Plessy v. Ferguson allowing segregation
44
New cards
Judicial review
The power of the Supreme Court to declare laws unconstitutional
45
New cards
Judicial restraint

Belied that judges and justices should not let their personal beliefs dictate the outcome of the case. (more conservative)

46
New cards
Judicial activism

belief that the courts have the power to make decisions based on the law and their political views. (more progressive)

47
New cards
Checks and balances
A system where each branch of government can limit the others' powers
48
New cards
Separation of powers
Dividing government power among legislative, executive, and judicial branches
49
New cards
Advise and consent
The Senate’s power to approve or reject presidential appointments and treaties
50
New cards
Texas v. Johnson (1989)
Flag burning is protected symbolic speech
51
New cards
Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (1988)
Schools can regulate student newspapers
52
New cards
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
Protected students’ rights to free speech (black armbands to protest the Vietnam War)
53
New cards
New York Times v. U.S. (1971)
Ruled that the government could not prevent newspapers from publishing the Pentagon Papers
54
New cards

Miller v. California (1973)

Defined obscenity and allowed local standards to determine what is obscene

55
New cards
Freedom of Religion
The right to practice any religion or no religion at all
56
New cards
Engel v. Vitale (1962)

Ruled that school-sponsored prayer in public schools violates the Establishment Clause (Religion)

57
New cards
Freedom of Speech
The right to express ideas and opinions without government restriction
58
New cards
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)

Protected students’ right to wear black armbands in protest of the Vietnam War (Speech)

59
New cards
Freedom of the Press
The right of newspapers and media to publish information without government censorship
60
New cards
New York Times v. United States (1971)

Ruled that the government could not prevent the publication of the Pentagon Papers (Press)

61
New cards
Freedom of Assembly
The right to gather peacefully for protests, meetings, and demonstrations
62
New cards
De Jonge v. Oregon (1937)

Confirmed that states cannot prohibit peaceful assemblies (Assembly)

63
New cards

Freedom of Petition

The right to express grievances and request changes from the government
64
New cards

Edwards v. South Carolina (1963)

Ruled that students peacefully protesting segregation had the right to petition the government without arrest (Petition)

65
New cards

Non-sectarian

Not affiliated with or restricted to a particular religion (syn. Non-denominational)