Sources Of Law

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/60

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 10:22 PM on 3/18/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

61 Terms

1
New cards

Nuisance

Unreasonable or unlawful use of property that results in material annoyance, inconvenience discomfort or injury to another person or the public

2
New cards

Trespass

The act of knowingly entering another person’s property without permission

3
New cards

Nuisance and Trespass Limitation

when the plaintiff must prove the defendant’s actions directly caused harm (causation)

4
New cards

precautionary principle

When human activity pose irreversible damage, protection must be taken even if no scientific certainty is lacking; the idea that 0 risk may be impossible

5
New cards

1970 Environmental Statues

Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Ocean Dumping Act, Safe Drinking Water Act

6
New cards

congress gives agency authority

step 1 for how a rule is born

7
New cards

Agency collects data, builds a record

step 2 for how a rule is born

8
New cards

agency proposed a rule, public comment

step 3 for how a rule is born

9
New cards

Agency finalizes rule and responds to commments

step 4 for how a rule is born

10
New cards

rule can be challenged in court

step 5 for how a rule is born

11
New cards

How a Rule is born

when congress gives agency authority, the agency collects data and builds a record, the agency proposes a rule and takes public comments, the agency finalizes the rule and responds to comments then the rule can be challenged in court

12
New cards

Cooperative Federalism

The shared responsibility for environmental regulation between federal and state governments; addresses the question, who is really in charge

13
New cards

Safe Drinking Water Act

the EPA issued a drinking water rule for PFAS called

14
New cards

PFAS Rule

this rule required water systems must monitor, notify and treat if needed. Utilities challenged this in federal court showing the rule making and challenge processes in place

15
New cards

Adminstrative Procedure Act

Sets the rules for how federal agencies create regulations and how courts can review those regulations

16
New cards

Sets rules and reviews for agencies creating regulations

the APA does what?

17
New cards

Authority

1st APA Challenge

18
New cards

APA Challenge Authority

Did Congress actually give the agency the power to issue this rule? This comes down to how the underlying law is interpreted

19
New cards

Procedure

2nd APA Challenge

20
New cards

APA Challenge Procedure

Did the agency follow all required steps? Notice must be meaningful, the agency must respond to important comments. Changing rules without notice can get a rule thrown out

21
New cards

Arbitrary and Capricious

3rd APA Challenge

22
New cards

Arbitrary and Capricious

A rule fails this standard if the agency didn’t consider important factors (connecting evidence to choices), explain tradeoff or ignored facts that didn’t fit its conclusion

23
New cards

Chevron Defense

When a law is ambiguous, courts defer to the agency’s interpretation as long as it’s reasonable.

24
New cards

Chevron Defense

This defense gave agencies significant power to interpret and apply their own statues

25
New cards

Risk decision factor - cost

Asks the questions: Would you pay extra for pollution controls? What if you couldn’t afford it - would you go without the product entirely?

26
New cards

Risk decision factor - location

Asks the questions: Does it matter how close you are to the harm?

27
New cards

Risk decision factor - who bears it

Asks the questions: Who is actually exposed to the risk? Who pays for the solution

28
New cards

Nuisance

When a neighbor sues a factory for polluting air or water that affected their quality, they are using a common law tool called

29
New cards

trespass

chemical runoff or air emissions settling on a neighboring property is an act of

30
New cards

Cuyahoga river fire, Santa barber oil spill

2 major pollution events of the 1970

31
New cards

1970

Year when major pollution events and growing public concern pushed Congress to act resulting in an explosion of federal environmental statues

32
New cards

1970

The Clean Air Act was passed in

33
New cards

Clean air act

regulates air pollutant emissions from stationary and mobile sources

34
New cards

1972

the Clean Water Act was passed in

35
New cards

Clear Water Act

reguates discharge of pollutants into US waters

36
New cards

1976

the Safe Drinking Water Act was passed

37
New cards

Safe Drinking Water Act

Protects public drinking water supplies

38
New cards

RCRA

regulates the management of solid and hazardous waste

39
New cards

1976

RCRA was passed in

40
New cards

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

RCRA stands for

41
New cards

Toxic Substance Control Act

TSCA stands for

42
New cards

1976

the TSCA was passed in

43
New cards

TSCA

regulates the introduction of new or existing chemicals

44
New cards

Statutory Authority

Without this, the agency has no legal basis to issue a rule; Congress must give an agency the power to act

45
New cards

building the record

after getting authority, the agency collects data to support its proposed rule

46
New cards

proposed rule/public comment

the agency publishes a proposed rule and must allow the public to comment

47
New cards

Final Rule

the agency publishes this and must respond to important public comments

48
New cards

Chevron v NRDC

this case challenges how EPA defined ā€˜stationary source’ under the Clean Air Act - should the courts accept the agency’s interpretation of an ambiguous term in the statue

49
New cards

Supported EPAs interpretation

How did Chevron feel about they Chevron v. NRDC case

50
New cards

challenged the EPA rule

How did NRDC feel about they Chevron v. NRDC case

51
New cards

stationary source

In Chevron v NRDC, NRDC argues that the Clean Air Act didn’t clearly define

52
New cards

Bubble policy

the EPA adopted this policy that treated an entire plant as one source

53
New cards

Chevron

in Chevron v. NRDC the Supreme Court sided with

54
New cards

chevron deference

The impact of the Chevron v NRDC ruling lead to the creation of

55
New cards

chevron deference

a doctrine that gave agencies broader power to interpret their own statues

56
New cards

Loper Bright

this case asked whether courts should keep deferring to agencies when laws are ambiguous; vehicle for the court to revisit Chevron

57
New cards

fishing company vs secretary of commerce

the parties in the Loper Bright case are

58
New cards

Loper Bright

the fishing company that challenges a federal rule requiring the to pay for federal monitors on their boats

59
New cards

overruled

In the Loper Bright case the Supreme Court ______ Chevron deference

60
New cards

Shifts power from agencies to courts

the impact of the Loper Bright ruling

61
New cards

Loper Bright

this case was controversial because agencies have subject matter expertise that courts may lack and it puts decades of regulations in question

Explore top flashcards

flashcards
Chapter 10.3
24
Updated 1163d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
amendments
76
Updated 1152d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Final vocab HELA 9
111
Updated 824d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Englisch Vok
220
Updated 99d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
11 tema
69
Updated 822d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
African Civilization Test
65
Updated 1224d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Biochem test 2
121
Updated 872d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Chapter 10.3
24
Updated 1163d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
amendments
76
Updated 1152d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Final vocab HELA 9
111
Updated 824d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Englisch Vok
220
Updated 99d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
11 tema
69
Updated 822d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
African Civilization Test
65
Updated 1224d ago
0.0(0)
flashcards
Biochem test 2
121
Updated 872d ago
0.0(0)