1/22
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Fillmore and Snow (2000)
language in education
teachers must know how to structure for maximum clarity, strategies for understanding what students are saying
teachers can assume something wrong with students using unknown language
teachers play a critical role in language development
Thornborrow (2004)
“one of the most fundamental ways we have of establishing our identity, and shaping other people's views of who we are, is through our use of language”
Holmes and Stubbe (2003)
power and politeness in the workplace
workplace talk is firming embedded in its social and organisational context
coworkers share : common assumptions, common reference system, jargon, background knowledge and experience, attitudes towards work and the objectives of their organisation
Wenger (1998)
communities of practice
any workplace group is “a group who regularly engage with eachother in the service of joint enterprise, and who share a repertoire of resources which enable them to communicate in a verbal shorthand which is often difficult for outsiders to penetrate”
Eckert (2003)
Language of adolescent peer groups
use of fillers (like or okay)
rising intonation
multiple negation
Stenstrom (2014)
Teenage talk
irregular turn taking
indistinct articulation (mumbling)
abbreviations and clippings
teasing and name calling
slang, taboo, vulgarisms
Howard Giles
Accomodation theory
speech is adjusted to suit the conversation
upward convergence - reduces non standard features, closer to the standard
downward convergence - increase non standard features, move away from the standard
mutual convergence - both participants language towards eachothers
divergence - styles move away, creating and emphasizing distance
Giles and coupland (1991)
In/Out groups
wide variety of social groups = shape each persons collective identity
In group - social affiliations a person feels that they belong
out group - social affiliations a person feels they don't belong
language, speech, non-verbal communication all show membership
Halliday
Anti-Languages
extreme socialects, groups placed outside the law
created by relexicalisation, use the same grammar as the main society
meanings are inaccessible to a non-user
viewed in a subculter as part of their identity
main form = conversation
Coleman
Lexical classification of
Slang - ephemeral, often colloquial lexis used by the in group
jargon - professional and official lexis allowing for precision
cant - Lexis used to obscure meaning from the out group, usually with criminal intent
Brown and Levinson
Politeness theory
strategies are developed to save the hearers face
Bald on record - no effort to reduce impact of FTA’s, shock and embarrass, close groups, comfortable
Positive politeness - expressing friendliness, groups of friends
Negative politeness - social distance, intruding and awkwardness, imposing on hearer
off-record indirect - removing yourself from any imposition
Habermas
Institutional power imbalances
“Language is a medium of domination and social force. It serves to legitimise relations of organised power”
Goffman
Facework
how people present themselves through language footing - speakers stance towards participant
Face - social value a person claims
Line - pattern of verbal/non-verbal acts
FTA’s - Stop a hearers need to be respected, used to dent another speakers face.
Facework is done to repair our face
positive face - need to be liked and respected
Negative face - right not to be imposed or interrupted
Drew and Heritage (1992)
Institutional Talk
key features between talk at work and everyday conversation
goal orientation
turn taking rules
professional lexis
asymmetry
allowable contributions
structure
Barker (2001)
Performativity of identity
“identities are not universal, fixed or essential entities, but are contingent of historically and culturally specific constructions of language”
Berstein
Restricted and Elaborated codes
restricted - speak with similar interests
informal, attitude and feeling
elaborated - individual and their uniqueness, arises with a gap or boundary
formal, facts and abstract ideas
Said that the working class use restricted and middle/upper uses elaborated
Milroy
Social Network theory
speech community members are all connected
closed network - contacts all know eachother
open network - contacts don't all know eachother
multiplex - individuals are linked in several ways (family, job, leisure activities)
networks are characterised by norms and values
Labov
Prestige
overt - perceived social norms and behaving in a socially desirable manner (rp)
covert - flours perceived social norms yet advantageous in certain context/social groups (regional dialect)
Grice
conversational maxims
successful, co-operative conversations relies on four principles
quantity - not saying too much, not saying too little
quality - don't say what you believe to be false, or that you lack evidence for
relevance - stick to topic, only shift appropriately
manner - avoid obscurity of expression
Bell
Audience Design theory
speaker designs language to take the audience into account
addressees ( ratified, directly addressed)
auditors ( ratified, not directly addressed)
overhearers (non-ratified, detectable)
eavesdroppers (non-ratified, undetectable)
Levy (2012)
Language in the military
two varieties: officialease and enlistic
code switching occurs when a speaker alternates between varieties
Ferguson (1959)
Language in the Military
everyone in the speech community is aware of varieties
high - standard, official purposes
low - conversation, friends, family, children
Tajfel and Turner
Social identity theory
Proposes that when an in-group identity is made or becomes noticeable, people wish to emphasise characteristics of their group, including use of social etc