crj 432 final

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/42

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

43 Terms

1
New cards

What is the Wade-Gilbert Rule?

criminal procedure that ensures a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel during post-indictment lineups or showups.

2
New cards

What's the difference between the corporeal and incorporeal identification?

Corporeal identification means the suspect is present in front of the defendant while incorporeal identification means the suspect is physically absent

3
New cards

By what percent, by a preponderance of the evidence, must be established for the procedure to be suggestive?

51%

4
New cards

What is Perry v. New Hampshire? 

addressed the Due Process Clause and eyewitness identification, specifically when police misconduct is not involved.

5
New cards

What is the Frye Test?

Scientific evidence must be generally accepted by experts to be admissible.

6
New cards

What is the Daubert Test?  (Hint: Broader view of Fyre)

A flexible standard for admitting expert evidence based on testing, peer review, error rates, and general acceptance.

7
New cards

What is CODIS? 

Combined DNA Index System.

8
New cards

What do polygraphs measure?

respiration, blood pressure, and perspiration

9
New cards

Define the Exclusionary Rule

exclusion of evidence that is obtained illegally

10
New cards

What exclusionary rule falls under what amendment? 

4th Amendment

11
New cards

Derivative evidence is evidence discovered as a result of ________ items seized.

unlawfully

12
New cards

What case established the exclusionary rule? 

Weeks v United States

13
New cards

What is the difference between direct evidence and the fruit of the poisonous tree? 

direct evidence is lawfully obtained, fotpt is unlawfully obtained

14
New cards

Why did the Supreme Court limit the silver platter doctrine?

in order to protect Fourth Amendment rights and close a loophole that allowed illegally obtained evidence to be used in court.

15
New cards

How did Mapp v. Ohio affect the 4th Amendment?

extended the Exclusionary Rule to state courts, meaning evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment (unlawful search/seizure) is inadmissible in all courts, not just federal.

16
New cards

What are the arguments for and against the Exclusionary Rule?

protects rights and integrity vs can let guilty people go free

17
New cards

What is the first step to challenging the reasonableness of a search?

filing a pretrial motion to supress

18
New cards

When a person has exhausted the state court of appeals, what can they do?

They can petition the U.S. Supreme Court by filing a writ of certiorari (asking the Court to review their case).

19
New cards

How many exceptions are there to the exclusionary rule?

There are five major exceptions:

  1. Independent source

  2. Inevitable discovery

  3. Good faith

  4. Attenuation (purged taint)

  5. Knock-and-announce rule violation (limited)

20
New cards

What case did the concept of entrapment come from?

Sorrells v. United States (1932)

21
New cards

What are the two tests for entrapment?

Subjective Test (used in most states and by federal courts):
Focuses on the defendant’s predisposition to commit the crime.

Objective Test (used in some states):
Focuses on the conduct of law enforcement, not the defendant’s mindset.

22
New cards

What is a tort?

a civil wrong (not a crime) that causes harm or loss

23
New cards

What are the two main types of constitutional tort actions (from the text)?

state and federal officers

24
New cards

State officers may be sued under the Bivens legal suit.

False

25
New cards

Define Section 1983 — what three elements should be established?

Section 1983 allows people to sue state or local officials for violating constitutional rights.
To file a claim, a plaintiff must show:

  1. The defendant acted under color of state law

  2. A federal right was violated

  3. The violation caused harm to the plaintiff

26
New cards

What is the significance of Monroe v. Pape (1961)?

It expanded Section 1983, allowing individuals to sue state officials for constitutional violations, even if the official's actions were unauthorized or illegal under state law.

27
New cards

The immunity clauses don’t apply to cities, towns, country & local gov. Agencies.

False

28
New cards

What are the purposes of injunctions?

Injunctions are court orders used to stop unlawful conduct, prevent future violations, or mandate changes in policies or practices — often used in civil rights and police misconduct cases.

29
New cards

Why are tort actions difficult to win?

Because plaintiffs must prove:

  • A clear violation occurred

  • The officer acted outside the scope of duty or law

  • Qualified or absolute immunity doesn’t apply

  • Strong evidence is required, which is often hard to obtain.

30
New cards

How many color-of-law federal criminal statutes are there?

Four main statutes.

31
New cards

What does “Blue Wall of Silence” mean?

refers to the informal code among police officers not to report misconduct or criticize fellow officers, even when they witness unethical or illegal behavior.

32
New cards

What’s the significance of Wayte v. US?

ruled that prosecutors have broad discretion to decide whom to charge.

33
New cards

Define vindictive prosecution.

When a prosecutor punishes a defendant for exercising a legal right (e.g., appealing a case) by increasing charges or penalties unfairly.

34
New cards

What is selective prosecution?

When a defendant claims they were singled out for prosecution based on impermissible factors (e.g., race, religion, political beliefs) rather than evidence.

35
New cards

What’s the next step following an arrest?

The initial appearance before a judge or magistrate.

36
New cards

What is the significance of Betts v. Brady?

Initially ruled that the right to counsel was not guaranteed in all felony cases—only under special circumstances.

37
New cards

What is Argersinger v. Hamlin?

Extended the right to counsel to misdemeanor cases that involve potential jail time.

38
New cards

Within how many days should a preliminary hearing be done after the first appearance?

Typically within 10 days if the defendant is in custody (rules may vary by jurisdiction)

39
New cards

What is the purpose of a preliminary hearing?

to determine if there is probable cause

40
New cards

What is prima facie?

“At first glance,” the case appears valid.

41
New cards

How many people are usually in a grand jury?

16 to 23 members under federal law.

42
New cards

What is the decision of the true bill?

A true bill means the grand jury has found enough evidence to indict the defendant and proceed to trial.

43
New cards

Define voir dire:

The process of questioning potential jurors to assess bias and select an impartial jury.