1/21
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
independent groups design
definition: each participant takes part in only one condition of the experiment
strengths: no order effects
limitations: participant differences can bias results
correlated groups design
definition: participants matched on key traits, then split into conditions
strengths: reduces individual differences
limitations: matching is difficult and time-intensive
nonexperimental designs
definition: no manipulation, no random assignment
strengths: real-world, ethical research
limitations: cannot establish cause and effect
experimental designs
definition: manipulation, control, and random assignment
strengths: can show cause and effect
limitations: may lack real-world realism
ex post facto studies
definition: study of existing differences after the event
strengths: can study otherwise unethical/impossible topics
limitations: no definitive cause and effect conclusions
single group posttest only design
definition: one group + treatment + posttest only
strengths: simple and fast
limitations: very weak evidence
single group pretest-posttest design
definition: one group measured before and after treatment
strengths: can track change
limitations: no control group; weak causal evidence
matched participants design
definition: participants matched on key traits, then split into conditions
strengths: reduces individual differences
limitations: matching is difficult and imperfect
counterbalancing
definition: varying the order of conditions in repeated measures
strengths: reduces order effects
limitations: can become complex and resource-heavy
repeated measures designs
definition: same participants in all conditions
strengths: controls individual differences
limitations: order effects
solomon’s 4 group design
definition:
strengths:
limitations:
multilevel, randomized between-subjects design
definition:
strengths:
limitations:
randomized, pretest-posttest control group design
definition:
strengths:
limitations:
randomized, posttest-only control group design
definition: randomly assigned groups, treatment vs. control, posttest only
strengths: strong causal inference without testing effects
limitations: no pretest
type 1 error
rejects the null hypothesis even though it is actually true
type 2 error
fail to reject the null hypothesis even though it is false
random assignment vs. random selection
selection: choosing participants randomly
assignment: assigning participants to groups randomly
how does the f-ratio provide a test of whether there is a difference between groups?
large f-ratio: groups likely differ
small f-ratio: differences likely due to chance
what does the numerator represent?
between group variance
what does the denominator represent?
within group variance
what do we expect the f-ratio to be if the null hypothesis is true?
all groups are equal and results are due to chance
what does effect size mean for ANOVA?
how much of the variation in the dependent variable is explained by the independent variable