LSAT Conclusion vs Premise vs Counterargument Indicators

Because

Premise

Since

Premise

For

Premise

For example

Premise

For the reason that

Premise

In that

Premise

Given that

Premise

As indicated by

Premise

Due to

Premise

Owing to

Premise

This can be seen from

Premise

We know this by

Premise

Thus

Conclusion

Therefore

Conclusion

Hence

Conclusion

As a result

Conclusion

So

Conclusion

Accordingly

ConclusionC

Clearly

Conclusion

Must be that

Conclusion

Shows that

Conclusion

Concludes that

Conclusion

Follows that

Conclusion

Premise Definition

gives a reason why something should be believed.

Conclusion Definition

the point the author tries to prove by using another statement

Furthermore

Premise

Moreover

Premise

Besides

Premise

In addition

Premise

What’s more

Premise

After all

Premise/Counter Argument

But

Counterargument

Yet

Counterargument

However

Counterargument

On the other hand

Counterargument

Admittedly

Counterargument

In contrast

Counterargument

Although

Counterargument

Even though

Counterargument

Still

Counterargument

Whereas

Counterargument

In spite of

Counterargument

Despite

Counterargument