1/15
These flashcards cover key Supreme Court cases relevant to AP Government, focusing on their decisions, significance, and constitutional implications.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Marbury v. Madison
Winner: Madison
Provisions: Article III, Section 2
Details: Established judicial review, ruling that the Supreme Court has the authority to declare legislation unconstitutional when it conflicts with the Constitution.
McCulloch v. Maryland
Winner: McCulloch (Federal Government)
Provisions: Article I, Section 8 (Necessary and Proper Clause) and Article VI (Supremacy Clause)
Details: Confirmed Congress's implied powers and reinforced that federal law is supreme over state law.
Schenck v. US
Winner: United States
Provisions: 1^{st} Amendment (Free Speech Clause)
Details: Standard determining that limits can be placed on First Amendment freedoms if the speech creates a clear and present danger to safety. The Supreme Court case that established the clear and present danger test for limiting free speech in times of war.
Brown v. Board of Education
Winner: Brown
Provisions: 14^{th} Amendment (Equal Protection Clause)
Details: Ruled that racial segregation in public schools is inherently unequal and violates the Constitution.
Engel v. Vitale
Winner: Engel (Parents)
Provisions: 1^{st} Amendment (Establishment Clause)
Details: Declared that state-sponsored, mandatory school prayer in public schools violates the prohibition against establishing a religion.
Baker v. Carr
Winner: Baker
Provisions: 14^{th} Amendment (Equal Protection Clause)
Details: Established that federal courts have jurisdiction to hear cases regarding state legislative reapportionment under the "one person, one vote" principle.
Gideon v. Wainwright
Winner: Gideon
Provisions: 6^{th} Amendment (Right to Counsel) and 14^{th} Amendment (Due Process Clause)
Details: Ruled that states must provide attorneys to defendants who cannot afford them in all criminal cases.
Tinker v. Des Moines
Winner: Tinker (Students)
Provisions: 1^{st} Amendment (Free Speech Clause)
Details: Affirmed that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate" unless it causes substantial disruption.
New York Times v. US
Winner: New York Times
Provisions: 1^{st} Amendment (Freedom of the Press)
Details: Reinforced the heavy presumption against prior restraint, allowing the publication of the Pentagon Papers despite government security concerns.
Wisconsin v. Yoder
Winner: Yoder
Provisions: 1^{st} Amendment (Free Exercise Clause)
Details: Ruled that Amish parents' right to free exercise of religion outweighed the state's interest in compelling school attendance beyond the 8^{th} grade.
US v. Lopez
Winner: Lopez
Provisions: Article I, Section 8 (Commerce Clause)
Details: Struck down the Gun-Free School Zones Act, ruling that carrying a gun in a school zone is not an economic activity that affects interstate commerce.
Shaw v. Reno
Winner: Shaw
Provisions: 14^{th} Amendment (Equal Protection Clause)
Details: Held that redistricting based solely on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny and that bizarrely shaped districts can be challenged as unconstitutional racial gerrymandering.
Citizens United v. FEC
Winner: Citizens United
Provisions: 1^{st} Amendment (Free Speech Clause)
Details: Ruled that corporate funding of independent political broadcasts in candidate elections cannot be limited, as it is a form of protected speech.
McDonald v. Chicago
Winner: McDonald
Provisions: 2^{nd} Amendment (Right to Bear Arms) and 14^{th} Amendment (Due Process Clause)
Details: Incorporated the Second Amendment to the states, ruling that the right to keep and bear arms for self-defense is applicable at the state level.
Mapp v. Ohio
Winner: Mapp
Provisions: 4^{th} Amendment (Exclusionary Rule) and 14^{th} Amendment (Due Process Clause)
Details: Established that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible in state courts.
Miranda v. Arizona
Winner: Miranda
Provisions: 5^{th} Amendment (Self-Incrimination Clause) and 6^{th} Amendment (Right to Counsel)
Details: Required police to advise suspects of their right to remain silent and their right to an attorney before custodial interrogation.