Unit 2- Chapter 15 The Federal Courts Government

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/21

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

22 Terms

1
New cards

Justiciable dispute

issues capable of being settle as a matter of law

2
New cards

Judicial implementation

how and when court decisions are translated into actual policy and thus affect individuals behavior - The courts rely on other units of govt. to enforce their decisions

3
New cards

Judicial Activism

an Approach to decision making in which judges sometimes make bold policy decision, even charting new constitutional ground

4
New cards

Judicial restraint

an approach to a decision making in which judges try and play a minimal role in policymaking roles and defer to legislatures whenever possible

5
New cards

Appellate Jurisdiction

juridisiction of courts that hear cases brought to them on an appeal from lower courts - these courts don't review facts on legal issues

6
New cards

statutory construction

judicial interpretaion of an act of congress. When this is an issue, congress passes new legislation to clarify

7
New cards

Court of Appeals

Federal Appallete courts empowered to review all final decisions of district courts, except in rare occasions. In addition they hear appeals to order of many federal regulatory agencies

8
New cards

District Courts

All federal courts with original jurisdiction, only federal courts where trials are held and which juries may be impanelled

9
New cards

Original Jurisdiction

refers to jurisdiction of courts that hear a case first, usually in a trial - these courts determine the facts

10
New cards

AMicus Cruiae Briefs

Legal briefs submitted by "a friend of the court" to influence a courts decision by raising new points of view and information not contained in formal briefs of parties

11
New cards

Class Action Lawsuits

When a small number of people sue representing a larger number of individuals in similar situations

12
New cards

standing to sue

the requirement that plaintiffs have a serious interest in a case, which depends on whether they have sustained or likely to sustain a direct or substantial injury from another party or government

13
New cards

Marbury v. Maddison

the 1803 case in which cheife justice john Marshal asserts the ability of the Supreme court to determine the constituationality of other branches actions and legislation. Estabished judicial review

14
New cards

Stare Decisis

latin phrase meaning " let the decision stand", most apallete courts rae settle on this principal

15
New cards

Opinion

statement of legal reasoning behind a judicial decision, context of the opinion can sometimes be more important than the decision itself

16
New cards

Solicitor General

refers to the presedential appointed position that is 3rd ranking in the Department of justice in charge of appallete court litigation of the federal government

17
New cards

Senatorial Courtesey

An unrwitten translation whereby nominations for state-level federal judicial posts are usually not confirmed if they are opposed by a sentaor of the Presedent's party from the state in which the nominee will serve. The tradition also applies to courts of appeals when there is opposition from a senator of the president's party who is from the nominee's state.

18
New cards

Supreme Court

The pinacle of the American Judiciary System. The Court ensures uniformity in interpretation of law, resolves conflict between states, maintains national supremecy in law - has both original and appallette jurisdiction

19
New cards

Originalism

a view that the constitution should be interpreted to the original intentions and meaning of the framers

20
New cards

Precedent

how similar cases have been decided in the past

21
New cards

Political Questions

A doctrine developed by the federal courts and used as a means to avoid deciding some cases, princially those involving conflicts between the president and congress

22
New cards

Judicial Review

The power of the courts to deterine whether acts of congress and, by impication, the executive are in accord with the U.S constitution. It was established by John Marshall and his associates in Marbury V. Madison