Closure Properties for Context-Free Languages

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/12

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

13 Terms

1
New cards

Closure Property (Definition)

A class of languages is closed under an operation if applying that operation to languages from the class always produces a language that is also in the class.

2
New cards

CFLs Closed under Union

CFLs are closed under union. If L1 and L2 are CFLs, then L1 ∪ L2 is a CFL. Proof: Create a new start variable S_new and rules S_new → S1 | S2, where S1 and S2 are the start symbols of the grammars for L1 and L2.

3
New cards

CFLs Closed under Concatenation

CFLs are closed under concatenation. If L1 and L2 are CFLs, then L1L2 = {xy | x∈L1, y∈L2} is a CFL. Proof: Create a new start variable S_new and rule S_new → S1 S2.

4
New cards

CFLs Closed under Kleene Star

CFLs are closed under Kleene star. If L is a CFL, then L* is a CFL. Proof: Create a new start variable S_new and rules S_new → S_new S | ε, where S is the start symbol of the grammar for L.

5
New cards

CFLs NOT Closed under Intersection

CFLs are NOT closed under intersection. There exist CFLs L1 and L2 such that L1 ∩ L2 is not a CFL. Example: L1 = {aⁿbⁿcᵐ}, L2 = {aᵐbⁿcⁿ} are CFLs, but L1 ∩ L2 = {aⁿbⁿcⁿ} is not a CFL.

6
New cards

CFLs NOT Closed under Complement

CFLs are NOT closed under complement. There exist CFLs L such that the complement ~L is not a CFL. This is a key difference from regular languages, which are closed under complement.

7
New cards

CFLs Closed under ∩ with Regular

CFLs are closed under intersection with a regular language. If L is a CFL and R is a regular language, then L ∩ R is a CFL. This is a useful property for proofs.

8
New cards

Using ∩ with Regular to Prove Non-CFL

To prove a language X is not a CFL, you can intersect it with a carefully chosen regular language R. If X ∩ R is a known non-CFL (e.g., {aⁿbⁿcⁿ}), then X itself cannot be a CFL (because if X were CFL, the intersection would have to be CFL).

9
New cards

Example: Proving {ww} is Non-CFL

Prove L = {ww | w ∈ {a,b}*} is not a CFL.

  1. Intersect L with the regular language a*b*a*b*.
  2. Result: L ∩ a*b*a*b* = {aⁿbᵐaⁿbᵐ | n,m ≥ 0}.
  3. Prove (via Pumping Lemma) that {aⁿbᵐaⁿbᵐ} is not a CFL.
  4. Therefore, L is not a CFL.
10
New cards

Example: Proving Complement of {ww} is a CFL

The complement of {ww}, i.e., L' = {x ∈ {a,b}* | x ≠ ww}, is a CFL. A grammar can be constructed that generates all strings with an odd length, or where a mismatch occurs at some mirrored position. This shows a CFL whose complement is not a CFL.

11
New cards

Summary: CFL Closure (Yes)

CFLs ARE closed under: Union, Concatenation, Kleene Star, Intersection with a Regular Language.

12
New cards

Summary: CFL Closure (No)

CFLs are NOT closed under: Intersection (general), Complement.

13
New cards

Key Difference from Regular Languages

Unlike regular languages, CFLs are not closed under intersection or complement. This is a major difference in their algebraic properties and computational power.