Bandura '61

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
New
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/18

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

19 Terms

1
New cards

What was the aim of Bandura ‘61?

To investigate whether a learnt behaviour will be replicated in a different setting.

2
New cards

What are the IVs?

  • Sex of the child

  • Sex of the model

  • Behaviour of the model

3
New cards

What is the DV?

The behaviour of the child

4
New cards

How were extraneous variables (like natural aggression levels) controlled for?

  • The natural aggression levels of the children was rated by their nursery teacher

  • Then using a matched triplets design the children were randomly assigned to a condition

5
New cards

What were the 3 experimental conditions?

  1. Aggressive model

  2. Non-aggressive model

  3. Control (no model)

6
New cards

Describe the sample of Bandura ‘61

  • 72 participants (36 male, 36 female)

  • Aged 36-69 months (average age 52 months)

  • All taken from the same nursery

  • 3 adults involved

7
New cards

Who were the 3 adults involved?

  • A male model

  • A female model

  • A female experimenter

8
New cards

What was stage 1?

Modelling

9
New cards

What happened in stage 1?

  • Each child was exposed to a condition

10
New cards

What happened in condition 1 (aggressive model) during the modelling stage?

The model was aggressive towards the bobo doll

  • Hit bobo with a mallet

  • Pushed bobo over

  • Punched and kicked bobo

  • ‘Sock him in the nose’ ‘pow’

11
New cards

What happened in condition 2 (non-aggressive model) during the modelling stage?

The model didn’t do anything to the bobo doll.

12
New cards

What happened in condition 3 (control) during the modelling stage?

We don’t know what happened

13
New cards

What was stage 2?

Aggression arousal

14
New cards

What happened in stage 2?

  • Children were taken to a room where they were free to play with attractive toys

  • They were then removed from the room after 2 minutes to incite aggression

15
New cards

What was stage 3?

Delayed imitation

16
New cards

What happened in stage 3?

  • Children were led into a room with aggressive (e.g gun) and non-aggressive toys (e.g crayons and paper)

  • Child was supervised by the experimenter doing some paperwork

  • Child was observed through a two-way mirror every 5 seconds for 20 minutes by multiple observers who were looking for physical and verbal aggression imitation (time sample)

17
New cards

What kind of observation did Bandura use in stage 3?

  • Structured

  • Covert

  • Non-participant

18
New cards

What were the results of Bandura ‘61?

  • Aggressive models created more aggressive imitation (25.8 vs 1.5)

  • Boys were more aggressive than girls (25.8 vs 12.4)

  • The male model had a greater impact on both genders than a female model

19
New cards

What conclusions can we draw from Bandura ‘61?

  • Not all behaviour is learned via reinforcement, some is learned through observation and imitation