Torts 8 - Negligence: Damages and Appointment

studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 7

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.

8 Terms

1

Smith v. Leech Brain & Co. Ltd.

Guy gets molten metal burn on lip, gets cancer from burn and dies. Co says it wasn’t foreseeable.

Defendant may be liable for compensatory damages in negligence where victim’s injury was foreseeable, even if extent of it was not.

New cards
2

Kenton v. Hyatt Hotels Corp.

Huge hotel disaster.

Award of compensatory damages is not excessive where it relates to nature, extent of injures, age, present/future economic loss, and comparable cases.

New cards
3

National By-Products, Inc. v. Searcy House Moving Co.

Truck driver kills two in crash, truck overweight, didn’t try to stop.

Punitive damages requires evidence defendant proceeded knowing they were likely to cause injury.

New cards
4

Mathias v. Accor Economy Lodging, Inc.

P gets bed bugs at Motel 6, sues saying Motel knew of infestation and hadn’t acted.

Punitive damages are not excessive just because it exceeds the ratio to compensatory damages by more than single digits.

New cards
5

Taber v. Maine

Navy guy D gets drunk while on leave, drives and crashes into Navy guy P. P sues US, they are vicariously liable.

US may be held vicariously liable for actions of service members cause injury offsite after drinking onsite.

New cards
6

Ravo v. Rogatnick

Baby has brain damage during delivery, sues both doctors but doesn’t know what part was caused by each.

Joint and several liability - multiple parties liable for harm without evidence who contributed most, they may be held jointly and severally liable.

New cards
7

Bencivenga v. J.J.A.M.M., Inc.

Guy gets punched at club, sues club for not stopping it when they had the chance. Club has to pay even though the assailant is not in court.

Joint liability may not be apportioned to a fictitious defendant who is not party to a suit.

New cards
8

Interinsurance Exch. of the Automobile Club v. Flores

Guys shoot dude out of a van, insurance company scared they’re gonna have to cover injuries cus it “arose out of use of the van.”

Insurer only required to pay for a claim against insured that plausibly might fall within the insurer’s promise to indemnify.

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 18 people
899 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 32 people
794 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 1 person
28 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 103 people
856 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 3 people
761 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 10 people
693 days ago
4.5(2)
note Note
studied byStudied by 39 people
953 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 11 people
776 days ago
5.0(1)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard (33)
studied byStudied by 3 people
792 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (62)
studied byStudied by 5 people
765 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (82)
studied byStudied by 10 people
56 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (40)
studied byStudied by 5 people
171 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (20)
studied byStudied by 115 people
507 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (25)
studied byStudied by 12 people
468 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (25)
studied byStudied by 2 people
661 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (38)
studied byStudied by 38 people
8 days ago
5.0(1)
robot