1/82
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
psychology
the study of the mind and behaviour
mind
subjective experiences (ex. sensations, perceptions, memories)
behaviour
observable actions of people or non-human animals
folk psychology
common-sense understanding of the mental states and behaviours
limitations of personal experience + intuition
experience has no control group
cannot generalize from single case
illusion of attention: we notice less of our world than we think we do
inattentional blindness: failure to percieve events outside the focus of one’s attention
confirmation bias: the human tendency to pay attention to and believe in evidenced that supports what we already think we know
we are unaware of subtle but powerful influences on behaviour
scientific approach
can formulate hypothesises on the basis of prior observation
theory
framework that explains and generates predictions about phenomena in the world
hypothesis
testable prediction about what will happen if theory is correct
data-set
set of observations used to generate hypothesis
replication study
repition of a study with new elements
direct replication
complete recreation of original experiment
conceptual replication
different methods and measures used to recapture original findings
open-science movement
initiative to make scientific research, data, and methods openly accessible and transparent with the goal of increasing reproducibility
meta-anaylsis
combination of results of multiple studies
variable
something that takes on different values (can be a person or condition)
manipulated variable
intentionally changed by researchers (y intercept)
measured variable
variable whose values are recorded by researchers (x intercept)
operational definition
specific description of how variable is measured/manipulated (turned from abstract to concrete)
open-ended questions
participant gives any answer that comes to mind
advantages of self-report
get inside participant heads, easy + inexpensive
disadvantages of self-report
difficulty identifying and verbalizing experiences, social desirability bias, not always aware of why we do what we do
social desirability bias
tendency to answer questions in a way that is viewed favourably
direct behavioural observation
researchers observe + record occurrences of behaviour
advantages of direct behavioural observation
more objective, observes real-world behaviour
disadvantages of direct behavioural observation
more time + resource intensive, can raise ethical issues, reactivity
reactivity
a change in behaviour caused by observation
reaction time
time to respond to a stimulus
advantages of indirect behavioural measures
avoids social desirability + reactivity
disadvantages of indirect behavioural measures
big gap between construct of interest and operationalization
advantages of physiological behavioural observation
outside participant control, displays link between relationships and health
disadvantages of physiological behavioural observation
expensive, invasive, and ambiguous
population of interest
set of cases a researcher has interest in
sample
group who participates in research that belongs to a population of interest
random sample
every person in a population has an equal chance to participate in research
WEIRD
white, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic
descriptive research
scopes out research problem to generate hypothesis, typically the first step in scientific research
case study
study of few individuals with unique conditions in depth
correlational research
measures 2+ variables in the same population sample to observe the relationship between them
scatterplot
figure used to represent correlation (closer together = stronger relationship, direction of slope = type of relationship)
correlational coefficient (aka R)
direction and strength of the relationship, ranges from negative to positive 1
3 key components of causality
2 variables must be correlated
1 variable must precede the other
no reasonable alternative explanation must exist (needs an experiment)
experimental research
a study in which one variable is manipulated and the other is measure
random assignment
participants are as likely to be assigned to one condition as to another
independent variable
manipulated variable in an experiment
dependent variable
measured variable in an experiment
control group
a condition comparable to the experimental condition in every way except that it lacks the thing hypothesized to produce the expected effect on the dependent variable
moderater variable
the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable that is conditional on the value of the moderator (eg. social media could be detrimental for younger adults)
mediator variable
the independent variable exerts its effect on dependent variable through another variable (eg. social media use increases social comparisons, leading to depression)
measurement/construct validity
are you measuring what you think you’re measuring
reliability
do you get the same results every time you administer the measure
internal validity
can we rule out alternative explanations in an experiment
confounds
alternate explanation for a relationship between 2 variables
placebo effect
when improvement happens after recieving inert substances
double-blind procedures
experiments and participants are unaware of who is in experiment group or control group
observer expectancy effect
expectations of an observer can influence the subject
demand characteristics
subtle cues from experimenter may give the participant a sense of whaqt is expected of them
external validity
can results be generalized to other samples/situations
statistic
numerical value derived from data set that helps describe the set/evaluate hypothesis
descriptive statistics
summarize sets of data (eg. mean, medium)
effect size
values describing strength of association or magnitude of effect
inferential statistics
helps assess if there is sufficient evidence to support hypothesis
Cohen’s d
different between groups expressed in terms of standard deviation
null hypothesis
hypothesis which a study disconfirms
p-value
the probability of getting a result as extreme as results of null hypothesis, goes from 0 to 1, if p value < 0.05 reject null
institutional review board (irb)
panel that evaluates if standards (autonomy, beneficience, justice) are met
autonomy
each participant has the right to decide without coercion to participate in study
informed consent
researcher must fully explain study procedures, risks + benefits before participating
beneficience
obligation to promote well-being and minimize harm
justice
fairness in distribution of benefits and burden of research
inattentional blindness
failure to percieve events outside the focus of one’s attention
illusion of attention
the human tendnecy to notice less of our world than we think we do
confirmation bias
the human tendency to seek out, pay attention to and believe in evidenced that supports what we already think we know
belief perseverance
maintaining a belief despite new information that firmly contradicts it
misattribution of arousal
when one mistakes what is making them aroused
confound
influences that interfere with an accurate measurement between the independent and dependent variable
internal validity factors
confounds affect internal validity, can be things such as
differential attrition
when dropout rate between the control group differs from the other groups involved, making it so that the participants who drop out have differing characteristics of those who stay in the study
average vs variability
average: where most of the points lie (central tendency)
variability: how far apart the points are (aids w external validity)
frequency distribution
representation of the number of observations within a given interval
mean
the average or center of a data set
median
the middle value in a set of data
mode
value that appears most frequently in a data set
standard deviation
a measure of how dispersed the data is in relation to the mean