tutorial content

What was the main topic of the Huesmann, Moise-Titus, Podolski, and Eron (2003) study?

The study examined the longitudinal relations between children’s exposure to TV violence and their aggressive and violent behavior in young adulthood

What type of study design did Huesmann et al. (2003) use, and what was the follow-up period?

It was a longitudinal study. The study followed participants for about 15 years from childhood (ages 6-10) to young adulthood (early 20s)

what is the general consensus in the literature regarding media-violence viewing and aggression?

Over the past 40 years, a body of literature strongly supports the notion that media-violence viewing is one factor contributing to the development of aggression. The evidence suggests it is one such long-term predisposing and short-term precipitating factor

Name one psychological theory proposed to explain the long-term effects of exposure to violence on aggression, as mentioned in the sources.

One theory is observational learning, specifically the acquisition of social-cognitive structures like schemas about a hostile world, scripts for social problem solving that focus on aggression, and normative beliefs that aggression is acceptable. Desensitization theory is another alternative or complementary theory

How does observational learning theory suggest children learn aggressive behaviour from observing violence?

Very young children have an innate tendency to imitate specific behaviours they see. Observing aggressive behaviours increases the likelihood of children behaving in exactly that way. As children get older, social scripts acquired through observation become more complex and automatic

How does desensitization theory explain the link between repeated exposure to violence and aggression?

Desensitization theory is based on the idea that repeated exposure to observing blood, gore, and violence causes the initial negative emotional response (e.g., increased heart rate, discomfort) to habituate, making the observer desensitized. This presumed lack of negative emotional response also applies to planning or thinking about violence, potentially making proactive-instrumental aggressive acts easier to commit

Name one psychological process proposed to explain the short-term effects of exposure to violence on aggression?

Name one psychological process proposed to explain the short-term effects of exposure to violence on aggression

How does priming theory explain short-term increases in aggression after observing violence?

Observing stimuli associated with violence (like weapons) activates memory traces for aggressive scripts, schemas, and beliefs, making their use more probable immediately afterward. A subsequent provocation is then more likely to stimulate aggression

How does excitation transfer theory explain short-term increases in aggression after observing violence?

Excitation transfer suggests that the emotional response stimulated by observing violence may be misattributed as being due to a subsequent provocation. This misattribution could lead to a more intense aggressive response in the short run

What is the "third variable" theory regarding the observed relationship between media violence exposure and aggression?

This theory suggests that the observed long-term positive relations are spurious and result from their joint association with one or more demographic, family, or personal characteristics (like social class or IQ) that are correlated with both TV viewing and aggression

What theory is incompatible with the idea that observing violence increases aggression?

Catharsis theory, which would predict that violence viewing should be followed by reductions in aggression. The sources state that empirical evidence for such a negative relation is almost nonexistent, making catharsis theory seem untenable

What did previous experimental studies (laboratory settings) consistently demonstrate about children's exposure to violent behaviour on film or TV?

Children exposed to violent behaviour on film or TV behave more aggressively immediately afterward. Children who saw violent clips behaved more aggressively toward each other or surrogate objects

What did field studies show about the relationship between the amount of TV violence a child regularly watches and their aggression?

The amount of TV and film violence a child is regularly watching is positively related to the child’s aggressiveness. Children who watched more violence behaved more violently and expressed beliefs more accepting of aggressive behaviour

What were the four major questions the Huesmann et al. (2003) follow-up study aimed to address?

The questions were: (a) To what extent does early childhood exposure to media violence predict young-adult aggression and violence? (b) Are there gender differences in the predictability? (c) Does identification with aggressive TV characters or belief in TV violence realism affect the prediction strength? (d) Is the long-term relation due to aggressive children liking violence or to a "third variable"?

How was adult aggressive behaviour measured in the Huesmann et al. (2003) study?

Data was obtained from three sources: self-reports, reports from "other" persons (spouse, friend, or significant other), and archival state data (criminal conviction records, moving traffic violation records). Multiple rating scales were used for self- and other-reports

How was a participant's adult TV-violence viewing score calculated?

It was computed as the average violence rating for the participant’s three favourite regularly scheduled TV programs, weighted by the frequency of viewing each show. Programs were rated on a 0-4 scale for visible, physical, intentional, interpersonal violence

Was the follow-up interview sample in Huesmann et al. (2003) perfectly representative of the original childhood sample? If not, how did it differ?

No. The participants who were successfully reinterviewed were less aggressive than those who were lost. They also scored higher on childhood intellectual ability and parents' education. The authors noted that this attrition might lead to underestimating the effects

Did childhood TV-violence viewing correlate significantly with adult composite aggression in the Huesmann et al. (2003) study?

Yes, for both male and female participants, childhood TV-violence viewing correlated significantly with the composite measure of adult aggression 15 years later. The correlations were r = .21 for males and r = .19 for females

Beyond TV-violence viewing amount, what other childhood TV-related factors significantly correlated with adult aggression in Huesmann et al. (2003)?

Childhood perceptions that TV violence reflects real life (perceived realism) and childhood identification with aggressive same-sex TV characters significantly correlated with adult aggression 15 years later

Were the correlations between childhood TV habits and adult aggression primarily driven by the highest viewers/identifiers/realism perceivers?

Yes, the figures and results suggest that the correlations between childhood TV-violence viewing and adult aggression largely resulted from the higher aggressive behaviour of the adults who were the highest violence viewers as children (the upper 20%). This was true for both male and female participants

How did childhood TV-violence viewing relate to specific aggressive behaviours in adulthood in Huesmann et al. (2003)?

High childhood TV-violence viewers (upper 20%) were significantly more likely to engage in specific serious aggressive behaviours in adulthood, such as pushing/shoving a spouse, responding to insults with shoving, committing criminal acts (self-report and state records), and moving traffic violations, compared to other viewers

Did childhood TV-violence viewing still significantly predict adult aggression after controlling for childhood aggression in the Huesmann et al. (2003) study?

Yes, for both male and female participants, early exposure to TV violence significantly predicts adult aggression even when childhood aggression is partialed out of the relation. The TV-viewing variables predicted increases in aggressive behaviour beyond what would be expected from participants' early aggressiveness

For which gender did identification with aggressive TV characters and perceived realism of TV violence exacerbate the effects of viewing TV violence on later aggression?

This interactive effect, where these factors strengthened the link between TV violence viewing and later aggression, was found only for male participants

What did the longitudinal structural models in Huesmann et al. (2003) suggest about the direction of the effect between TV-violence viewing and aggression?

The models suggested it is more plausible that exposure to TV violence increases aggression than that aggression increases TV-violence viewing. Path coefficients from childhood TV-violence viewing to adult aggression were positive, significant, and about twice the magnitude of non-significant paths from childhood aggression to adult TV-violence viewing

Did controlling for socioeconomic status (SES) and intellectual ability explain away the longitudinal relation between childhood TV violence and adult aggression in Huesmann et al. (2003)?

No. When parents' education and the child's intellectual ability were introduced as control variables, the paths from childhood exposure to TV violence to adult aggression remained significant

Did controlling for parent aggression, parent TV habits, and parenting practices explain away the longitudinal relation between childhood TV violence and adult aggression in Huesmann et al. (2003)?

No. The path from early TV-violence viewing to adult aggression remained significant and was never reduced substantially by the introduction of these parent variables in the structural models

How did the magnitude of the longitudinal effects of media violence on aggression in this study compare to effects of other factors?

The effect sizes for media violence were modest. The authors note that few other factors have been shown to have larger effects, which is not surprising given the large number of factors contributing to serious adult aggression

What implications for violence prevention do the authors suggest based on their findings regarding the age of exposure?

They suggest that society should be more concerned about children's exposure to media violence than adults' or teenagers' exposure, as the real long-term effects seem to occur with children

What characteristics of violent scenes make them particularly concerning for increasing a child's risk of aggressive behaviour, according to the sources?

Scenes where the child identifies with the perpetrator of the violence, perceives the scene as realistic, and where the perpetrator is rewarded for the violence

Besides reducing exposure, what methods targeting the viewing child were mentioned as potential interventions to mitigate the effects of TV violence?

Potential methods include parental co-viewing and commenting on programs51 and school-based attitude change interventions that teach children that TV violence is not realistic and should not be imitated (critical viewing skills)