Studies
Antonova (2011) Terms to define
Neurotransmitters
Agonist
Antagonist
Acetylcoline
Scopolamine
Exitatory synapse
Inhibitory synapse
Antonova (2011) Aim
To see if scopolamine affected hippocampal activity in the creation of spatial memory
Antonova (2011) Procedure
Sample of twenty healthy male adults
Double-blind procedure
Participants were randomly allocated to one of two conditions, 1. Injected with scopolamine, 2. Injected with a placebo, aproximately 90 mins before the experiment
They were trained in the game to make sure they were comfortable with the controls and understood the rules
The participants were put into an fMRI where they were scanned while playing a virtual game called “arena task”
With the game the researchers aimed to observe how participants were able to create spatial memories
The goal of the game is for the participants to go around the arena until they reach a pole
After learning where the pole is located, the screen would go blank for 30 secs, during this time the participants were told to actively rehearse how to get to the pole
They would then regenerate in a different starting spot in the arena and they had to find the pole again using their spatial memory
The participants’ brain activity was measured for six trials
They returned 3-4 week later and redid the test, reciving the opposite treatment (scopolamine or placebo) to the original study (repeated measures design)
Antonova (2011) Results
Participants that were injected with scopolamine had a significant reduction in the activation of the hippocampus compared to when they recieved a placebo
Acetylcholine plays a critical role in encoding spatial memory
Scopolamine acts as an antagonist ffor acetylcoline as it reduces or blocks the effects of acetylcholine
Antonova (2011) Evaluation
Rogers and Kesner (2003) Terms to define
Neurotransmitters
Agonist
Antagonist
Acetylcholine
Scopolamine
Exitatory synapse
Inhibitory synapse
Rogers and Kesner (2003) Aim
To determine the role of acetylcholine in the formation of spatial memory
Rogers and Kesner (2003) Procedure
30 rats acclimated to a Hebb Williams maze using food
Randomly allocated to one of two conditions. 1. injected with scopolamine, 2. injected with a saline solution (placebo) ten minutes before running the maze
The placebo injection was used to make sure that the fact of gettin an injection alone wwas not responsible for any change in memory (confounding variable)
Both injections were made directly to the hippocampus
Encoding of memory was assessed by the average number of errors made on the first five trials of day 1 compared to the last five trials of day 1
To asses retrieval they used the average number of errors made on the first five trials of day 2 compared to the last five of day 1
Rogers and Kesner (2003) Results
The scopolamine grouo took longer and madde more mistakes in learning the maze
It did not appear to have an effect on retrieval of memories that had already been created
It appears that acetylcholine may play an important role in the consolidation of spacial memory
Rogers and Kesner (2003) Evaluation
Strengths:
Controlled environment: Rats were acclimated, reducing extraneous variables.
Random allocation: Ensured comparability between groups.
Placebo control: Isolated the effects of scopolamine.
Clear measurements: Defined encoding and retrieval through error counts.
Ethical adherence: Likely followed animal welfare guidelines.
Limitations:
Limited generalizability: Results may not apply to humans.
Low ecological validity: Maze task may not reflect real-life memory.
Narrow focus: Only acetylcholine was studied, excluding other factors.
Short-term focus: Long-term effects were not examined.
Potential confounders: Individual rat differences could affect results.
Conclusions:
Acetylcholine is involved in memory encoding, but not retrieval.
Supports the role of acetylcholine in memory consolidation.
4o mini
Neurotransmitters and studies general evaluation
Attributing complex human behaviors to neurotransmitters is reductionist, however it has led to drug treatments
Research on animals may not be generalized to humans, eventhough there are clear similarities in physiological processes
Lack ecological validity by not showing how the neurotransmitters functions in normal behavior