1/10
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
How was Enron different from other energy companies
A shift from traditional energy production to energy trading/ financial engineering
Complex opaque financial structure
Culture of growth at all costs
Strong political connections
Highlight some of the features of mark-to-market accounting
Recognized future expected profits as current revenue
Created inflated earnings that weren’t real
Investors and analysts misled
SPE/SPV
Special purpose entity/ vehicle (A separate legal company set up for a single, narrow purpose)
Why did Enron use SPE/SPV
They had high debt, and use of SPE/ SPV meant that they could transfer risk off of Enron’s balance sheet, it also meant that banks ignored the red flags due to lucrative fees and relationships
Reasons For Enron’s collapse
Excessive risk taking along with weak regulation
Incentives tied to short term earnings
Toxic corporate culture
Lack of transparency
Greed and conflicts of interest
Board oversight and Auditors failed
Why did investors support Theranos
Strong narrative (Holmes compared to Steve Jobs)
Secrecy justified
Board filed with high profile names
FOMO in sillicon valley investing culture
Reasons For the Collapse of Theranos
Fraudulent Claims
Lack of scientific validation and transparency
Misleading partnerships
Over-reliance on the image/ charisma of the founder
Lessons from Theranos
Importance of due dilligence, governance, industry expertise on boards, and transparency
Stake holders involved/ harmed (Theranos)
Investors (Lost millions)
Patients (Inaccurate results)
Employees (Pressured, silenced)
Regulators/ public trust (undermined)
Similarities between the enron and theranos cases
Charismatic leadership that led to risky culture
Lack of transparency and misleading claims
Boards Failed
Auditors and regulators not acting strongly enough
greed and hype over prudence
Huge harm to stakeholders
Differences between Enron and Theranos Cases
Industry
Mechanism of fraud (Accounting manipulation vs false claims about tech)
Scale of impact (Fortune 500 vs startup)
Complicit auditors vs secrecy keeping auditors/ scientists out)
Regulatory failure (SEC, FDA)