ap gov SCOTUS cases

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/12

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

13 Terms

1
New cards

marbury v madison

facts: marbury petitioned for writ of mandamus to confirm his judicial appointment

const. principle: judicial review (article iii)

decision: confirmed judicial review (declare laws as unconstitutional)

impact: judicial branch is co-equal

2
New cards

mcculloch v maryland

facts: mcculloch wanted to tax US bank in maryland

const. principle: supremacy + N&P clause in article i

decision: federal laws > state laws, national bank is constitutional

impact: strengthened implied powers & fed gov

3
New cards

engel v vitale

facts: NYC school wanted to instate voluntary prayer 

const. principle: establishment clause (1st)

decision: school-sponsored prayers represent gov involvement 

impact: separation of church & state in education

4
New cards

wisconsin v yoder

facts: amish family was sued for pulling their children out of school 2 years early

const. principle: free exercise clause (1st)

decision: individual liberties → compulsory education does not mean insubordination to all other interests (religious exercise)

impact: allowed for religious exemptions from generally applicable laws

5
New cards

tinker v des moines

facts: schools made rule against students who wanted to wear black arm bands in protest of vietnam war

const. principle: freedom of speech (1st)

decision: schools can’t preemptively restrict when no clear disruption is present

impact: established substantial disruption test (on “school operations”)

6
New cards

new york times v united states

facts: nixon invoked prior restraint to prevent release of pentagon papers (exposing US lies on vietnam war)

const. principle: freedom of press (1st)

decision: prior restraint not valid because it wasn’t in interest of “national security”

impact: heavy presumption against prior restraint

7
New cards

schenck v united states

facts: schenk distributed pamphlets discouraging men from enlisting in wwi draft

const. principle: freedom of speech (1st)

decision: unlawful speech bc went against espionage act by actively encouraging avoidance

impact: ‘clear and present’ danger test

8
New cards

gideon v wainright

facts: gideon couldn’t afford a lawyer and florida didn’t provide one

const. principle: right to counsel (6th)

decision: guarantee of counsel applies to state courts

impact: states must provide legal representation for all criminal cases

9
New cards

mcdonald v chicago

facts: chicago’s ban on handguns prevented mcdonald from using one for self defense (lived in dangerous area)

const. principle: 2nd amendment (privileges & immunities)

decision: right to self defense is fundamental and applicable to states

impact: selective incorporation, indiv right to own firearms

10
New cards

brown v board of education

facts: linda brown denied entry to public school in her area, forced to commute further

const. principle: equal protection clause (14th)

decision: separate educational facilities are inherently unequal

impact: state-sanctioned segregation in public education is unconstitutional

11
New cards

baker v carr

facts: tennessee rural districts had more voting power than urban areas

const. principle: equal protection clause (14th) + political question doctrine

decision: legislative reapportionment cases are justiciable

impact: “one person, one vote” principle & caused mass redistricting

12
New cards

shaw v reno

facts: north carolina created “bizarrely shaped” district to increase black representation

const. principle: equal protection (14th)

decision: race can’t be the sole factor

impact: increased difficulty in creating majority-minority districts

13
New cards

united states v lopez

facts: lopez arrested for carrying handgun, was charged under fed law (justified by commerce clause)

const. principle: commerce clause

decision: fed gun law was unconstitutional bc lack of substantial connection to interstate commerce

impact: reaffirmed dual federalism, limited congress’s power