1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Sample
40 men
20-50 y/o
New Haven USA
Volunteer sample - advertisement
unskilled workers to professionals and educated
Sample strength
Varied as had unskilled to skilled workers and a range of ages (20-50)
representative, gen
Sample weakness
only male
all volunteered
all New Haven USA
no one above 50 y/o
unrepresentative not gen
Procedure (validity)
lab at Yale university
2 confederates
Told to administer shocks to learner to help with memory task
participant always given role of the teacher
Deceived, thought shocks were real but they weren’t
procedure (validity) strength
Ppts not told true aim of study
Deception reduces demand characteristics
increase internal validity of findings that most people will obey destructive orders from authority figures , accurate
Procedure (validity) weakness
Artificial setting - Yale lab
Unnatural behaviour, lack ecological validity
Procedure (standardisation)
ppts individually brought into the lab by experimenter who followed script
ppt could hear learner ‘crying out’ when shocked
300v learner heard saying ‘that’s enough get me out of here’
if ppt objected to giving shocks, experimenter encourage them using prods
Procedure (standardisation) strength
Roles of ppt as teacher and confederate as learner always the same
Set script always used
Responses from learner pre-recorded
Replicable, compare to check for consistency, increasing reliability
Procedure (standardisation) weakness
prods use were not always the same, deviated from script on occasion
lack reliability
Aim
To see if ordinary people would carry out a destructive order from an authority figure
Results
65% ppts obeyed to 450v and 100% obeyed to 300v
Conclusion
Most people will obey a destructive order from a legitimate authority figure
Aim, results, conclusion strength
Application
Tarnow 2000
Improve pilot training to encourage first officers to challenge authority of pilot when they’re in error
Tarnow believes this could prevent up to 20% of plane crashes
Milgram’s research has influenced training methods
Aim, results, conclusion weakness
Not all ppts continued to give the highest shock
35% didn’t
Questions effectiveness of applying to society