1/47
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Psychoanalytic Perspective on Attachment
Freud proposed that infants and their birth parent experience a symbiotic relationship thru nursing
infants assume they are one with the caregiver
the weaning process (introducing solid food) should be managed such that the infant’s need to suck is neither frustrated nor overgratified
consequence of either: fixation in oral behaviors like nail biting and swearing
Erikson extended this perspective in recognition that an infant’s social world is more than nursing
eg. interactions w/ caregivers → to trust or not trust the environment (trust versus mistrust stage)
Ethological Perspective: Attachment
thru evolution, humans have predispositions that strongly influence their development thru forming emotional connections with caregivers to ensure survival
aka attachment theory
infants create internal models
developed thru attachments with other ppl
viewing interactions as good/bad
understanding how to treat others
early life attachment may affect later relationships
Attachment Theory
argues that infants are genetically predisposed to form emotional bonds with their caregivers
this predisposition exists because infants are totally dependent on their caregivers for survival
first 2 years of life is a sensitive period for forming such relationships
those who fail to form a close relationship before age 2 are at risk for future social and personality problems
Attachment
thru caregiver responsiveness, most infants develop a positive attachmentÂ
i.e. lasting emotional connection between two people leading to trust/security
they learned that the caregiver will ensure their safety and care
caregivers don’t have to be biologically related
attachment depends on quantity and quality of interactions (eg. responsiveness, predicting needs)
the baby’s attachment emerges gradually and is based on her ability to discriminate between her parents and other people

Bowlby’s Attachment Development: Phase 1
Non-focused orienting and signaling
0-3 months
proximity promoting behaviors directed at anyone
Bowlby’s Attachment Development: Phase 2
Focus on one or more figures
3-6 months
signals directed at fewer people, often those who they are most familiar with
Bowlby’s Attachment Development: Phase 3
Secure Base Behavior
6-24 months
genuine attachment develops as evidenced by proximity seeking to their safe base to have their needs met
Bowlby’s Attachment Development: Phase 4
Internal model
24+ months
development of an internal model of attachment allows children to predict how specific actions will impact their connection with caregivers
Assessing Infant Attachment
cannot be directly observed (often internal), and therefore inferences made about the quality of attachment thru observing infants and caregivers
stranger anxiety, separation anxiety, social referencing
Stranger Anxiety
expressing negative feelings around strangers
don’t know if they should feel comfortable around new people
not limited to strangers, includes ppl who they don’t see every day but have met
Separation Anxiety
being away from caregiver
involves removal of touch, or out of eyesight
Social Referencing
process of using others’ facial expressions for information about how to react to a situation (usually caregiver)
infants can wander into situations that are new and strange
because they don’t know how to respond to these situations, they rely on other people for guidance
Attachment Styles
Secure, avoidant, ambivalent, disorganized/disoriented
can have diff. attachment styles w/ diff. ppl
depends on caregiver responsivness
Secure Attachment
infant readily separates from the primary caregiver
seeks proximity when stressed
uses the caregiver as a safe base for exploration
Avoidant Attachmet
infant avoids contact with primary caregiver
shows no preference for that caregiver over other people
an insecure attachment style
Ambivalent Attachment
infant shows little exploration
greatly upset when separated from the primary caregiver
not reassured by the caregiver’s return or effort to comfort them
an insecure attachment style
Disorganized/Disoriented Attachment
infant seems confused or apprehensive
shows contradictory behavior such as moving toward the primary caregiver while looking away from them
type of insecure attachment
Caregiver Charactersistics on Attachment
emotional responsiveness: recognize and respond to child’s emotions
willing and able to form an emotional attachment to the infant
contingent responsiveness: how appropriately and promptly caregivers respond to a child’s signals or needs
matching the energy
tactile responsiveness: the caregiver’s touch and physical contact
caregiver relationship factors: the relationship between parents
if good: likely secure w/ both
if poor: less likely to be secure w/ both
mental health: if caregivers are unable to take care of themselves, how can they take care of a child?
Caregiver Charactersistics on Attachment: Emotionally Distressed Parents
economically or emotionally distressed parents, psychological or medical health problems, might be distracted by their own problems that they can’t invest emotion in the parent-infant relationship
such parents may be able to meet the baby’s physical needs, but unable to respond emotionally
Stability and Change in Attachment
when an infant’s environment is relatively consistent, their attachment is likely to remain consistent
infant attachment can change if the relationship changes
often due to circumstances (eg. divorce, abuse)
avoidant style: likely if the mother rejects the infant or regularly withdraws from contact with them
ambivalent style: likely when the primary caregiver is inconsistently or unreliably available to the child
disorganized style: when the child has been abused in which either parent had some unresolved trauma in their own childhood
Proximity
pleasurable for both parents and babies
mother/father usually has to carry out other duties while simultaneously caring for a baby
keeping babies close by helps parents protect them from harm
proximity contributes to the development of strong emotional bonds between infants and caregivers
Marital Status
infants whose parents are married are more likely to be securely attached than babies whose parents are either cohabiting or single
married parents typically have more education and are less likely to be poor
infants who are exposed to marital conflict and arguments are more likely to display signs of emotional withdrawal
Mental Health
depression diminishes parent’s capacity to interpret and respond to important infant signals such as crying
more likely to describe their infants as difficult or emotionally negative
infants are more likely to develop insecure attachments, and later emotional problems
Long-Term Consequences of Attachment Quality
attachment theory proposes that early emotional relationships shape later ones
both psychoanalysts and ethologists are correct in their assumption that attachment relationships serve as the foundation for future social relationsips
children with secure attachment are more socially skilled, have more intimate friendships, more likely to be leaders, higher self esteem and better grades
children with insecure attachment have less positive and supportive friendships in adolescence but also are more likely to become sexually active early and to practice riskier sex
an adult’s internal model of attachment affects their parenting behaviors
secure: more responsive and sensitiveÂ
insecure: more likely to view their infants negatively and lack confidence in their ability to perform effectively in the parenting role
Personality
Children and adults’ pattern of responding to people and objects in their environment
individual differences in personality appear to develop throughout childhood and adolescence
Temperament
characteristic differences among individual in emotional reactivity, self-regulation, and activity that influences reactions to the environment
appears early in life
relatively stable in infancy, becomes more consistent in early childhood and can be predictive of later behavior (even in adulthood)
not solidified until first year of life
how we view temperament varies w/ culture
not all infants can be classified into the three temperaments below (doesn’t add to 100%)
individual differences in temperament are inborn
Easy Temperament
40% of infants
approach new events positively
display predictable sleeping and eating cycles
generally happy
adjust easily to change
generally positive mood and even tempered
Difficult Temperament
10% of infants
irregular sleeping and eating cycles
emotional negativity and irritability
resistance to change
Slow to Warm Up Temperament
15% of infants
few intense reactions (either negative or positive)
appear non responsive to new people
5 Dimensions of Temperament
helps to not classify an infant as a single temperament
trait based approach
5 Dimensions of Temperament: Activity Level
A tendency to move often and vigorously, rather than to remain passive or immobile
5 Dimensions of Temperament: Approach/ Positive Emotionality/ Sociability
A tendency to move toward rather than away from new people, situations or objects, usually accompanied by positive emotion
5 Dimensions of Temperament: Inhibition and Anxiety
Tendency to respond with fear or to withdraw from new people, situations or objects
opposite of the one above
5 Dimensions of Temperament: Negative Emotionality/ Irritability/ Anger/ Emotionality
Tendency to respond with anger, fussiness, loudness or irritability; a low threshold of frustration
often assigned with “difficult children”
5 Dimensions of Temperament: Effortful Control/Task Persistence
An ability to stay focused, to manage attention and effort
Factors that Influence Temperament
heredity: eg. identical twins are more alike in temperament than fraternal twins
long-term stability: some aspects are stable across infancy and into children’s later yearÂ
neurological processes
environment: eg. niche picking, our choices reflect our temperaments
goodness of fit: the compatibility b/w a child’s temperament and their environment (like the parenting methods)
the better the match, the more favorable the child’s adjustment
Gender Differences
temperamental differences between boys and girls are much smaller than the differences perceived by parents and other adults
temperamental stereotyping may affect the quality of the parent-infant relationship
eg. parents displaying more affection for a girl they perceive to be more feminine than one whom they view as masculine
Self-Concept
The set of attributes, attitudes and characteristics that a person uses to describe and define themselves
how we view ourselves will impact how we interact with others and/or environmentÂ
some researchers argue than infants are born with the capacity to differenciate themselves from others
others argue that self-awareness isn’t innate and instead starts to emerge at a basic level at ~3 months
Subjective Self
an infant’s awareness that they are a separate person from others and can act on their environment, and that this separate self endures over time and space
infants as young as 2-3 months begin to learn they can have an effect on the things around themÂ
a sense of “I” begins to emerge
subjective self often fully emerges once infants understand object permanence around 8-12 months
eg. social smile, a facial expression that is directed at another person to elicit a response
Objective Self
for the toddler to understand they are also an object in the world
the “self” has qualities or properties, such as gender, size, name, etc.
begin to show “Mine!” attitude toward toys or other treasured objects
begin to refer to themselves by name, and near the end of 2nd year, label themselves as boy or girl
understand they belong to the “child” category
Emotional Self
provides the infant the ability to decipher emotional cues, such as facial expressions and to relate others’ feelings to their own
around 12 months, infants’ perceptions of others’ emotion help them anticipate others’ actions and guide their own behavior
Self-Concept: Self-Recognition
Ability to identify the self, usually with mirror recognition
~3 months, infants my begin to react positively to their mirror image
~8-9 months, infants are aware movements in the mirro coincide to their own movements
~18-24 months, most infants touch their noses if they see that there is something on it’s mirror image
~ age 2, advances in self-awareness allows toddlers to begin to experience more complex emotions (eg. secondary emotions like shame, guilt or embarassment)
comparing their actions to how others will react and judge themselves based on thatÂ
~1.5-2.5 years, toddlers move beyond self-recognition to include development of objective self
Non Parental Care: Physical Development
more likely to be overweight both early in life and when they reach school age than children who are cared for exclusively by their parents
children who are overweight attain motor milestones slower and are less physically active than their peers
a pattern that continues into the middle childhood years and contributes to lifelong weight problems
Non Parental Care: Cognitive Development
school readiness is the primary goal of parents who choose nonparental care for toddlers and preschoolers
some evidence that high quality daycare has beneficial effects on many children’s overall cognitive development, but not in all cases
level of stimulation at home vs daycare:
if more enrichment at daycare than home, then daycare attendance has beneficial cognitive effects
if home has more enrichment, then daycare has negative effects
Non Parental Care: Stress Hormones
levels of cortisol increase from morning-afternoon in infants who are enrolled in center-based care, especially in children under 3 years old
cortisol levels decrease over the course of the day in home-reared infants
some developmentalists argue that the higher levels of cortisol experienced by center-care infants affect their rapidly developing brains in ways that lead to problem behaviors
studies also suggest that stress hormones have both positive and negative effects on young brainsÂ
Non Parental Care: Quality and Quantity of Care
nonparental care arrangements probably vary in the degree to which they induce stress in infants and children
quality of care may be just as important as quantity of careÂ
Non Parental Care: Gender Differences
individual and gender differences have been found to interact with non parental care
boys in non parental care are more likely than girls in similar care settings to be insecurely attached to their caregivers
Non Parental Care: Small Differences
on average, the differences between children in non parental care and their home-reared peers, both positive and negative, are very small
family variables are more important than the type of daycare arrangements a family chooses
the kind of daycare parents choose is an extension of their own characteristics and parenting styles (eg. choosing a day care that doesn’t emphasize infant learning)
daycare effects are parenting effects in disgusedÂ