1/36
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
optimization of genetic code
maximize silent changes —> in line with common mutational signatures
common mutation types cause conservative/tolerated substitutions rather than radical ones
resource allocation —> could have been a problem back in the day (based on nitrogen/carbon/oxygen availability)
amount of tRNAs and their modifications —> affects translation rates of individual codons which can affect mRNA stability and protein folding
which tRNA codes for stop codon
NONE —> tRNA’s job is to bring in an AA, so lack of one would signal that translation is done
nonsense mutations
special because they can be suppressed by a trans-acting factor
trans factor can suppress premature stop codon and allow for read-through
tRNA mutates to suppress and bring in an AA —> cell still needs to be able to tolerate this change though
CCA
universal for all tRNAs and the hydroxyl of A is used to add the AA (charge the tRNA)
modified bases in tRNAS can:
change their codon specificity
alter their stability
control their interactions with charging enzymes
wobble base pairing
3rd codon (first base for anticodon) can expand or contract interaction potential
how many tRNAs needed for MET
2!
1 for initial start and another for regular methionine
wobble base pairing vs watson crick
WC (optimal codons) is much faster than wobble
non-optimal codon synergy
cause ribosomes to slow down a lot
codon choice can allow for proper protein folding
ex) fast sequence with optimal codons can result in faster translation —> followed by less optimal codons to slow down translation a little so that previous segment can fold properly before moving on to the rest
codon choice controls mRNA stability
faster translation = better codon choice = mRNA more stable because we need more of it (positive feedback)
poor translation = mRNA unstable = negative feedback
essentially, translation can act as an amplifier
optimal codons
most expressed tRNAs, WC base pairing
non-optimal codons
least expressed tRNAs, Wobble base pairing
slow decoding = unstable mRNA
E-site can act as a good timer
nonoptimal codon = waiting for tRNA longer so A-site is empty
tRNA in P-site eventually shifts to E-site and leaves
if A-site is still empty when this happens, NOT5 recognizes this and binds to empty E-site
recruits Ccr4 which is a deadenylase that stimulates decapping for mRNA, resulting in mRNA degradation
most RNA in cells
rRNA and then tRNA
most highly transcribed genes are:
ribosomal proteins
ribosomes structures
mostly RNA with some ribosomal proteins decorating the surface
only tRNA that binds to P site
initiator tRNA —> ribosome assembles around this and then closes P-site off
does ribosome check with AA is brought in along with tRNA?
NO!
ribosome only checks the tRNA
EfTu
elongation factor needed for each round of elongation
GTPase that delivers tRNA to A-site and then hydrolyzes to induce conformational change —> if tRNA stays stable after this change, then it leaves the tRNA in the A-site and goes away
when is AA checked?
only at charging step with aminoacyltransferase
mRNA surveillance pathways
nonsense mediated decay
non-stop decay
no-go decay
nonsense mediated decay
as ribosome translates, it strips off the proteins on the mRNA
if there’s an early stop codon, ribosome will fail to strip of EJC which then acts as timer and will result in mRNA degradation because it knows that the protein product is truncated
EJC is correlated to ORF to some extent
non-stop decay
truncated mRNAs - no stop codon, message just ends
causes ribosome to just stall at the end which also triggers decay
no-go decay
colliding ribosomes due to stalled ribosome in front → signal for a major problem
reasons for ribosome stalling
secondary structure in mRNA it has to unwind first
poly-Arginine codons because they can get stuck in channel due to biochemical properties
inhibitory codon pair (synergize)
P-site proline codon → structure is annoying
poly-Lysine codons
depurination of mRNA
recognition of stalled ribosome
collided ribosomes!
collided ribosome recruits collision sensors that mark lead ribosome with Ub (K63-linked poly Ub)
this recruits RQC complex to dissociate lead ribosome
listerin then comes in and targets nascent polypeptide on lead ribosome through K48-linked polyUb to mark for degradation
pathway to recognize stalled monosome
A-site empty for too long → Mag2 adds a monoUb
results in polyUb (K63-linked)
ribosome splits and small subunit is eliminated
full pathway for collided ribosomes
collision sensed and ribosome is ubiquitinated
factors sent to inhibit initiation and activate decay
RQC activated —> focused locally on specific ribosome
when RQC is overwhelmed
signalling through kinases activates ISR which results in a global shut down of translation by inhibiting eIF2 (adds inhibitory phosphate)
OR if ISR is overwhelmed —> apoptosis
causes of collided ribosomes
RNA damage or formaldehyde (crosslink between proteins and RNA)
ribosomes might be better sensors of NA damage
SUPER dense on RNA and have less area to surveil (compared to the entire genome for DNA/RNA Polymerase)
value of sequencing RNA to learn about ribosomes
use Ribo-seq to find where ribosomes area and at what density
comparing ribosome footprints to mRNA by RNA-seq can give us an idea about translation efficiency
purification of different factors = specific kinds of ribosomes?
discover unknown proteins by finding ribosome association in places we thought was noncoding
find evidence for non-canonical start codon initiation, translation read through of stop codons, ribosome frameshifting
harringtonine
traps ribosomes on initiation codons —> determine non-canonical start codons
2 populations of fragment length from Ribo-seq
28 nt and 21 nt
large fragment (28 nt)
non-rotated state
pre-decoding → waiting for t-RNA in A site and GTP hydrolysis hasn’t occurred yet
small fragment (21 nt)
rotated state
post-decoding but pre-translocation → t-RNA in A-site but hasn’t shifted to P-site yet (GTP hydrolysis complete)