2.2.4 Agricultural Collectivisation & its Impact

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/9

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

10 Terms

1
New cards

Collectivisation

Under collectivisation peasants were forced to work to government targets and share resources. Any profits after state demands were met were shared equally among members of the kolkhoz.

2
New cards

Initial problems with collectivisation

  • Both richer and poorer peasants resented the government interference in their lives. It was not only kulaks who opposed the change.

  • Peasants frequently destroyed their crops to avoid handing it over to the communists.

3
New cards

Collectivisation paused

  • ecause of this, collectivisation was paused in 1930.

  • Stalin accused party officials of being overzealous (too forceful) in their attempts to force peasants to give up their produce (even though they were just following orders). This slowed down the collectivisation campaign.

4
New cards

Starvation

  • By 1933, at the end of the campaign, a famine led to 1.3 million deaths in Kazakhstan and 1 million in Russia.

    • 5.7 million died across the whole country during the collectivisation years.

  • Yet the Communist Party now controlled the countryside.

5
New cards

Oppression

  • Ukraine was a nation with rich farmland that was part of the Soviet Union. Lots of Ukrainians refused to join collective farms.

  • The people who resisted were brutally oppressed. Stalin wanted to smash Ukrainian nationalism and culture.

6
New cards

Interpretations

Fitzpatrick 'Everyday Stalinism' (1999):

  • Since [the Communist Party] believed that this revolutionary transformation was in the long-term interests of the people, they were willing to force it through, even when, as with collectivization, a majority of the relevant population clearly opposed it. They explained popular resistance as a result of the backwardness, prejudices, and fears of the unenlightened masses.

7
New cards

The Successes and Failures of Collectivisation

Though collectivisation led to widespread famine and oppression, Stalin saw some successes.

8
New cards

Successes

  • Stalin saw the policy as a political success because it meant he was now in control of the countryside.

  • Each Machine Tractor Station had a secret police officer to control the area.

  • Grain which could be sold abroad was used to pay for the Five-Year Plans, which Stalin sold as an economic success.

9
New cards

Failures

  • Overall yields saw no significant increases during collectivisation, and only small amounts of grain could be sold overseas.

  • Russia’s agricultural technology did not improve, the policy was hugely unpopular, and resulted in a huge loss of life.

  • Food supplies to the cities remained poor because of the chaos in the countryside

10
New cards

Holodomor

  • The starvation which happened in the Ukraine was known as ‘Holodomor’. This means ‘extermination by hunger’.

  • Stalin refused foreign assistance, and denied that the famine existed.

  • Some historians have suggested that the death toll was as high as 3.3 million people. By June 1933, 28,000 people were dying each day.

Explore top flashcards