1/23
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Can violence be predicted?
courts have allowed clinicians to make predictions, but acknowledged their fallibility
risk assessment or dangerousness potential
wording matters
some researchers view risk as being highly dependent on situations and circumstances
Clinical Assessments
rely on clinical experience and professional judgment
Actuarial Assessment
measurable, valid risk factors
Drawbacks of Actuarial Assessments
focused on a small number of factors
passive predictors
focus on static variables
may include risk factors that are not accepted on legal grounds
race, sex
may ignore risk factors that have unknown validity
threats of violence
may not generalize to other contexts
have restricted definition of violence risk
cannot address nature, duration, severity/frequency, and how soon violence may occur
Structured Professional Judgment (SPJ)
gathering critical info
identifying presence of risk factors
evaluating their relevance
developing scenarios in which the individual may or may not be violent
Risk Factors
individual characteristics believed to be associated with or predictive of antisocial behavior
Dynamic
Static
Dynamic Risk Factors
change over time and situation
Substance abuse
Attitudes towards a specific group
Can be divided into
Stable:
change occurs slowly
attitudes
Acute:
change occurs rapidly
mood swings
emotional arousal
better predictors of the tendency of sex offenders to reoffend
Static Risk Factors
cannot change; historical factors
age of onset
criminal history
criminality in family
diagnoses
Risk Assessment Instruments
should only be conducted by psychologists or other MHPs
be certain that the instruments used have empirical support in research literature
designed by:
gathering target population
identifying key variables
Competency to Stand Trial (CST)
fitness to stand trial or fitness to proceed
can occur in jail, psychiatric hospital, or community
can be reevaluated
Dusky v. United States
defendants are competent to stand trial if:
they have “sufficient present ability to consult with [their] lawyer”
defendants must understand what is happening AND be able to assist their attorney in the preparation of their defense
“Dusky standard”
The Competency Screening Test (CST)
sentence completion test
“when a jury hears my case, they will…”
intended to provide a quick assessment
but is wrong 53.3% of the time
The MacArthur Competency Assessment Tool - Criminal Adjudication (MacCAT-CA)
vignette describing a situation in which a person is charged with a crime and are asked questions about it
Evaluation of Competency to Stand Trial - Revised (ECST-R)
interview based
focuses on the “Dusky standard”
ability to detect malingering
Other Measures of Competency
Interdisciplinary Fitness Interview-Revised (IFI-R)
semi-structured interviews
Assessment of Malingering
required in every type of forensic mental health assessment
malingering in attempt to:
delay proceedings
get a case dismissed
avoid a trial
Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms
Methods of Restoration to Competency
administration of medication
civil commitment
Mens Rea
“guilty mind”
people cannot be help responsible for crimes if they did not possess this
Competency
mental state at the time of the criminal justice proceedings
Sanity
mental state at the time of the crime
Insanity Standards
use of tests to determine the extent of criminal responsibility
knowledge of the difference between right and wrong
awareness of what one is doing is wrong
Insanity Defense Reform Act (IDRA)
sets the standard for insanity in cases in federal courts
Guilty but mentally ill (GBMI(
Rogers Criminal Responsibility Assessment Scales (R-CRAS)
rated on:
psychopathology
reliability of their report of the crime
organicity
cognitive control
behavioral control
Mental State at the Time of the Offense Screening Evaluation (MSE)
an observation of the person’s appearance and assessment of orientation
psychomotor activity
behavior
attitude
emotional responses
Treatment of Defendants Found NGRI
period of civil commitment
follow-up and monitoring services
conditional release