1/104
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Factorial Design
Study with 2 or more independent variables (IVs), including all combinations of their levels
Independent Variable (IV)
Variable manipulated by the researcher to examine its effect on a dependent variable
Dependent Variable (DV)
Outcome measured in a study
Levels of an IV
The different conditions or values of an independent variable
Factorial Notation (e.g., 2×3)
Number of levels for each IV in a factorial design
Main Effect
The overall effect of one independent variable on the dependent variable, ignoring other IVs
Interaction Effect
When the effect of one IV on the DV depends on the level of another IV
Interaction (example)
Caffeine improves memory only when sleep is low, but not when sleep is high
Three-Way Interaction
When a two-variable interaction changes depending on a third variable
Independent-Groups Factorial Design
All IVs are between-subjects (different participants in each condition)
Within-Groups Factorial Design
All IVs are within-subjects (same participants experience all conditions)
Mixed Factorial Design
Includes at least one between-subjects IV and one within-subjects IV
Participant Variable
A pre-existing characteristic (e.g., age, gender) that is not manipulated
Quasi-Independent Variable
A participant variable used as an IV but not manipulated
Advantage of Factorial Designs
Can test interactions and are more efficient than separate experiments
Disadvantage of Factorial Designs
Can be complex and difficult to interpret
Null Hypothesis (Factorial)
No main effects and no interaction between IVs
Interpreting Main Effect
Compare averages across levels of one IV
Interpreting Interaction
Look at how one IV changes across levels of another IV
Key Sign of Interaction
Lines are NOT parallel on a graph
Range Effect
Distortion in results when DV hits the upper or lower limit
Ceiling Effect
Scores cluster at the top of the scale
Floor Effect
Scores cluster at the bottom of the scale
Why Range Effects Matter
They hide true differences between groups
Respect for Persons
Participants have autonomy and can choose to participate
Informed Consent
Participants are informed about the study before agreeing
Coercion
Pressuring someone to participate (unethical)
Beneficence
Researchers must minimize harm and maximize benefits
Justice
Fair distribution of research benefits and burdens
IRB (Institutional Review Board)
Committee that reviews research for ethical standards
Deception
Withholding or misleading participants about the study
Debriefing
Explaining the true purpose of the study after participation
Research Misconduct
Fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism
Data Fabrication
Making up data
Data Falsification
Altering data
Plagiarism
Using someone else's work as your own
3 Rs
Replacement, Reduction, Refinement
Replacement
Use alternatives instead of animals when possible
Reduction
Use the smallest number of animals necessary
Refinement
Minimize harm and improve animal welfare
Why Use Animals
Greater control and fewer ethical constraints than human research
Non-Experimental Research
No manipulation of variables; used for description or prediction
Why Use Non-Experimental Research
When manipulation is unethical, impractical, or to study real-world settings
External Validity
How well results generalize to the real world
Observational Research
Studying behavior by watching and recording
Naturalistic Observation
Observing behavior in a natural setting
Participant Observation
Researcher becomes part of the group being studied
Reactive Behavior
Participants change behavior because they are being observed
Observer Bias
Researcher's expectations influence observations
Interobserver Reliability
Agreement between multiple observers
Behavioral Categories
Predefined behaviors used for observation
Sampling (Observational)
Strategy for selecting what/when to observe
Time Sampling
Observe at specific time intervals
Event Sampling
Record every occurrence of a behavior
Archival Research
Using existing records/data to study behavior
Content Analysis
Systematic analysis of recorded information
Nonreactive Measure
Data collected without participants knowing
Advantage of Archival Research
High external validity, real-world data
Disadvantage of Archival Research
Data may be incomplete or biased
Case Study
In-depth study of one individual or small group
Why Use Case Studies
Study rare phenomena or generate new hypotheses
Limitation of Case Studies
Cannot generalize findings
Survey
Method of collecting self-reported data from participants
Correlational Analysis
Measures relationship between two variables
Predictor Variable
Variable used to predict another
Criterion Variable
Outcome variable being predicted
Open-Ended Question
Participant responds freely
Closed-Ended Question
Participant selects from given options
Likert Scale
Rating scale (e.g., strongly agree to strongly disagree)
Semantic Differential Scale
Rating between two opposite adjectives
Double-Barreled Question
Asks two things at once (bad design)
Leading Question
Suggests a desired answer (biased)
Good Survey Design
Clear, simple, unbiased, one idea per question
Quasi-Experiment
Study with an IV but no random assignment
Pretest-Posttest Design
Measure participants before and after a treatment
Interrupted Time-Series Design
Multiple measurements before and after an event
Advantage of Quasi-Experiments
Useful when random assignment is not possible
Disadvantage of Quasi-Experiments
Cannot make strong causal claims