1/45
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Social psychology
Studies how behaviors of an individual or group is influenced by others
Attribution
Explaining someone's behavior by crediting the situation or the persons deposition or personality
Dipositional attribution
Persons behavior caused by internal factors personality traits
Situational attribution
Persons behavior caused by external factors such as environment & situation
Fundamental Attribution error
Tendency to overemphasize disputional factors as explinations for other people behoviors underestimate situational factors
Actor observer bias
Attributing other peoples behavior to internal factors while attributing your own behavior to the situation
Self serving bias
When something good happens to you you tend to make disposition attribution but when something bad happens you tend male situational abtribrution
Explanatory style
The way people try to explain cause of events
Optimistic explanatory style
Tend to pub a positive spin on events weather good or bad
Pessimistic explanatory style
Tend to put a negative spin on events weather good or bad
Just world hypothesis
. Beliefs people get what they deserve good people get positive outcomes & bad people get negative outcomes
Collectivist culture and individual cultures
Bring Connor to family work together use like to make fundamental attribution aware of situational
2- independence growth more likely to commit o fundamental attribution error and self serving bias
Halo effect
Tendency for an impression created in one area to influence opinion in another area
Attitude
. thoughts or feelings about someone/something that influences how we respond to that someone/something
ELABORATION LIKELIHOOD MODEL
2 paths of persuasion: central and peripheral
CENTRAL ROUTE TO persuasion
persuasion is direct, using factual info & logical arguments...requires target to be attentive...causes lasting change in attitude
.PERIPHERAL ROUTE TO PERSUASION
persuasion is indirect, using emotional appeal ...doesn’t require target to be attentive...causes temporary change in attitude
PERSUASION =Â
Â
process of changing our attitude towards something
FOOT-IN-THE-DOOR PHENOMENON
persuasion strategy…tendency for people who first agree to a small request to later agree to a larger request
DOOR-IN-THE-FACE PHENOMENON
persuasion strategy…tendency for people who first deny a large request  to later agree to a smaller request
Cognitive dissonance
psychological tension, anxiety, and discomfort that occurs when your behavior doesn’t match your attitude
.CONFORMITY
tendency for people to adopt behavior, attitudes, beliefs of other members of group...can be in response to real or imagined group pressure
SOLOMON ASCH’s CONFORMITY EXPERIMENTS
demonstrates group majority can have big influence on individual’s judgment (WATCH VIDEO)
Confederates
Â
(actors that secretly pretend to be participants in experiment)Â
who intentionally gave wrong answerA
Normative social influence
Conform to group to fit in and feel good and be accepted
Informational social influence
Conform due to belief that group is skilled or knowledgeable especially in uncertain situation
STANLEY MILGRAM’s OBEDIENCE
participants gave other people stronger and stronger shocks because authority figure told them to do so… showed surprising degree to which we obey authority (WATCH VIDEO)
Obedience
Taking action in response to a person of authority figure or person of high status
Factors that promote obedience
American society places high value on obedience to people in authority = parents, teachers, police, employers, politicians
FACTORS THAT REDUCE obedience _
If someone else refuses to obey, you’ll be more likely to disobey as well
Social role
pattern of behavior expected of a person in a role such as parent, student, waiter, e
Social norms
unwritten rules of behavior that are considered acceptable in a group or society
Script
person’s knowledge about sequence of events expected in specific setting
De individualization
becoming so involved in a group that you…
lose self-control, getting caught up in crowd mentality and act like crowd,Â
even when it behaves badly
feel a sense of anonymity, feeling you can’t be singled-out
lose sense of personal responsibility: group’s to blame so consequences for you as individual won’t be as drastic
PHILIP ZIMBARDO’s STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENTÂ
studied deindividuation by having students play the roles of prisoners and guards
INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONAL (I/O) PSYCHOLOGISTS
apply psychological concepts to workplace to optimize employee performance and job satisfaction
SOCIAL FACILITATION
tendency for an individual’s performance to improve when simple or well-rehearsed tasks performed in presence of others
SOCIAL INHIBITION
tendency for an individual’s performance to decline when complex or poorly-learned tasks are performed in the presence of others
SOCIAL LOAFING
making less effort to achieve a goal when working in a group
BYSTANDER EFFECT
onlooker doesn’t volunteer to help victim/person in distress because
DIFFUSION OF RESPONSIBILITY
feeling less responsible for taking action when others are around, assuming someone else step in
Group polarization
tendency for group that holds same opinion to strengthen their opinion after group discusses topic
Groupthink
people want consensus (agreement) within group so set aside personal beliefs to adopt opinion of group, often leading to poor decision making
False consensus effect
 tendency to overestimate how much others have same beliefs and behaviors as us
Social trap/ social dilemma
situation in which conflicting groups, each pursuing their own self-interest, become caught in mutually destructive behavior
Prisoners dilemma
social trap in which 2 prisoners, each acting in their own self-interest, worsen the punishment