Ultra Vires Judicial Review

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/14

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

15 Terms

1
New cards

McColl

Substantive ultra vires = where a body has no statutory basis for acting in the way it has

2
New cards

Procedural ultra vires

  • The body has the power but failed to follow the requirements 

  • Eg failed to consult, failed to follow statutory steps etc

  • Ridge v Baldwin

3
New cards

improper purpose

  • Using power for a purpose which parliament did not intend

  • Padfield

4
New cards

relevant/irrelevant considerations

  • Where body has considered irrelevant factors, or failed to consider relevant factors

  • Fewings

5
New cards

Fettering discretion

  • Adopting a rigid policy and refusing to consider exceptions 

  • British Oxygen 

6
New cards

Unauthorised delegation

Who can exercise the power?

7
New cards

Error of law

  • Any error of law by body = ultra vires

  • Anismic Ltd 

8
New cards

Quintavalle 


  • Courts ruled that embryos were within the scope of the act 

  • Parliament had not intended to confine the body’s powers

9
New cards

Black-Clawson International


  • Statutory interpretation is “seeking the meaning of the words which Parliament used”

10
New cards

UNISON

fees in employment tribunals illegal because unaffordable

11
New cards

R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)


  • The 2014 Act in authorising the Secretary of State to set the fees did not impose any criterion of affordability

  • in the 2014 Act Parliament did not specify that there must be adjustments made to the level of the fees charged or the waiver of such fees for children who could not afford to pay the specified fee

12
New cards

Judicial deference

= courts restraining themselves from interfering with decisions made by public bodies

  • Public bodies = democratically accountable

  • Expertise

13
New cards

Cox

Could only be challenged on irrationality as there was no clear legal error

14
New cards

R v Richmond Council


  • Council acted outwith its powers as there was no statutory basis for charge 

15
New cards

D&J Nicol v Dundee Harbour Trustees 


  • Using ferries for excursions was outwith the territorial limits designated by the statute

  • Ultra vires 

  • A statutory body can only do what Parliament expressly or necessarily impliedly authorises. Just because it might be commercially sensible does not mean it is lawful.