Pure Economic Loss

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/8

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

9 Terms

1
New cards

Define pure economical loss and add any relevant cases

C can't recover for any financial losses unless they flow from physical damage (Spartan steel v Martin & Co ltd) (Jain v Strategic health Authority)

2
New cards

What is the exception to this rule and add relevant case

That C cannot claim for pure economical loss where D has made a negligent misstatement (Hedley Byrne v Heller and Partners)

3
New cards

How can a claim in pure economical loss be successful

1) If a negligent misstatement has been made

2) If there is a special relationships between C & D

4
New cards

State the five criteria required to establish a special relationship

1) D must have special skill or expertise

2) C must assume responsibility for their statement

3) Must be a known user

4) Must be a known purpose

5) D must show that he relied on C's statement and for it to be reasonable for D to have relied on C's statement

5
New cards

State the relevant cases for D possessing special skill or expertise / skill and judgement

Lennon v MPC and Smith v Eric S Bush / Mutual life v Evatt

6
New cards

State the relevant cases for C must assume responsibility for their statement

Hedley Byrne v Heller and Partners

7
New cards

State the relevant cases for Must be a known user

Caparo v Dickman

8
New cards

State the relevant cases for Must be a known purpose

Law Society v Peat Marwick

9
New cards

State the relevant cases for D must show that he relied on C's statement and for it to be reasonable for D to have relied on C's statement

Smith v Eric S Bush