1/72
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Multilevel perspective
Analyzing group processes at individual, group, and societal levels
Group fallacy
Attributing intentions to group instead of individuals
Thomas theorem
Perceived situations determine behavior
Social facilitation
Improved performance on simple tasks in presence of others
Evaluation apprehension
Concern about being evaluated drives performance changes
Distraction-conflict
Presence of others divides attention and increases arousal
Social orientation theory
Personality determines facilitation or impairment
Electronic performance monitoring
Increases effort through evaluation pressure
Ringelmann effect
Effort decreases as group size increases
Coordination loss
Poor synchronization reduces performance
Motivation loss
Reduced effort due to group setting
Social loafing
Reduced effort when individual output is not identifiable
Free riding
Reducing effort because others compensate
Sucker effect
Reducing effort to avoid exploitation
Social compensation
Increasing effort to offset weak members
Collective effort model
Effort depends on value and expectancy of group success
Disjunctive task
Group performance depends on best member
Conjunctive task
Group performance limited by weakest member
Kohler effect
Weak members increase effort to avoid being weakest
Task conflict
Disagreement about ideas can improve performance
Relationship conflict
Personal tension harms performance
Conflict spiral
Escalation through reciprocal negative actions
Overmatching
Retaliating more strongly than initial act
Coalition formation
Subgroups form to gain influence
Emotional contagion
Emotions spread and intensify conflict
Dual concern model
Conflict behavior based on concern for self and others
Shared information bias
Groups discuss shared more than unique information
Hidden profile problem
Group fails to identify optimal solution
Group polarization
Group decisions become more extreme
Persuasive arguments mechanism
Dominant arguments strengthen initial position
Social comparison mechanism
Members shift views to appear favorable
Social identity mechanism
Members align with group norm
Groupthink
Consensus seeking overrides critical evaluation
Directive leadership effect
Leader pressure increases groupthink
Group isolation effect
Lack of external input increases groupthink
Mindguards
Members shield group from dissenting information
Illusion of unanimity
False perception that everyone agrees
FIRO theory
Compatibility based on inclusion, control, and affection
Social comparison orientation
Tendency to frequently compare oneself
SEM model
Self-esteem maintained in social comparison
Comparison level standard
Evaluating satisfaction relative to expectations
CLalt standard
Evaluating alternatives to current group
Equifinality
Cohesion arises from multiple pathways
Collective efficacy
Shared belief in group’s ability
Identity fusion
Strong merging of personal and group identity
Relational cohesion theory
Positive interactions strengthen commitment
Cohesion-performance reciprocity
Cohesion and performance reinforce each other
Temporal need-threat model
Stages of response to ostracism
Rejection sensitivity
Tendency to expect and overreact to rejection
Sociometer theory
Self-esteem tracks inclusion status
Majority influence
Direct influence causing conformity
Minority influence
Indirect influence causing deeper change
Consistency principle
Consistent minorities are more influential
SIDE model
Anonymity strengthens group-based conformity
Social impact theory
Influence depends on strength, immediacy, and number
Dynamic social impact theory
Influence produces clustering and uniformity
Agentic state
Reduced autonomy under authority
Obedience determinants
Context factors affecting obedience levels
Iron law of oligarchy
Power concentrates in few individuals
Expectation-states theory
Status based on perceived competence
Status generalization
Status transfers across domains
Contingency theory
Leadership effectiveness depends on situation fit
LPC scale
Distinguishes task vs relationship leaders
Transformational leadership
Inspires and changes follower values
Babble effect
Frequent speakers emerge as leaders
Minimum power theory
Preference for maximizing control in coalitions
Bargaining theory
Coalitions shaped by negotiation and fairness
Coalition fairness effect
Fair payoff increases coalition likelihood
Self-concept model dishonesty
Dishonesty limited by moral self-image
Collaborative dishonesty
Dishonesty increases when benefiting group
First-mover effect
Initial behavior sets group norm
Ethical free riding
Benefiting from others’ dishonesty while staying honest
Moral disengagement group
Group context enables unethical behavior