1/17
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Weeks v. US
exclusionary rule is recognized federally
Mapp v. Ohio
exclusionary rule is recognized at the state level
Boykin v. Alabama
defendant has to state before a judge that the plea they are accepting is voluntary
North Carolina v. Alford
Allows defendants to enter a guilty plea but maintain innocence
Santobello v. New York
Court requires prosecutor to keep their promise in terms of a plea deal
Ricketts v. Adamson
Defendants have to uphold the plea agreement
Bordenkircher v. Hayes
Threatening a stiffer sentence is permissible and part of “any legitimate system which tolerates and encourages the negotiation of pleas”
Batson v. Kentucky
Batson rule: challenges that allow a lawyer to excuse a potential juror without giving a reason
Furman v. Georgia
The death penalty, as it was being administered at the time, constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the 8th Amendment
Gregg v. Georgia
The death penalty itself is not cruel and unusual punishment; BUT, using it as a mandatory sentence is considered cruel and unusual punishment
Sanford v. Kentucky
It is not unconstitutional to execute people for crimes that are age 16 or older at the time they committed the crime
Penry v. Lynaugh
It is constitutional to execute someone for a crime despite the fact that they are intellectually or mentally handicapped
Atkins v, Virgina
Defendants with an IQ less than 70 cannot be executed for their crime; Overturns Penry
Roper v. Simmons
You cannot execute offenders under the age of 18 at the time of the crime being committed; Overturns Stanford
Uttecht v. Booker
If the death penalty is on the table as a punishment, lawyers can demand that they have a jury that is willing to hand out the death penalty in the second half of the case (sentencing)
Cooper v. Pate
SCOTUS ends the hands-off policy and demands courts decide on questions dealing with corrections
Hudson v. Palmer
Allows prison officials to search cells and confiscate materials
Samson v. California
Even on parole, you have to agree to be subject to warrantless searches