personality + individual differences

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
call with kaiCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/28

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 10:27 PM on 1/18/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

29 Terms

1
New cards

what is the dark triad (Paulhus + Williams, 2002) + what does the theory refer to

collection of 3 traits that are maladaptive, but still within the normal range of functioning (so are sub-clinical). includes:

  • narcissism

  • Machiavellianism

  • psychopathy

though NPD + APD are established clinical disorders, these traits can also be found in the normal population

2
New cards

how did Ames et al. (2006) define narcissism + what are 3 key features

a grandiose yet fragile sense of self, as well as preoccupation with success + demands for admiration. features:

  • an excessively self-centered perspective, strong sense of entitlement + preoccupation with success

  • require excessive admiration + believes they are special, so as such only associate with high-status people

  • feelings of inferiority usually at the root of inflated ego, so can be envious of others + diminish others’ success/accomplishments

3
New cards

what are the two main aspects to the narcissistic personality

grandiosity + vulnerability

4
New cards

where did the term ‘Machiavellian’ come from

derived from Machiavelli → Italian diplomat who lived during the Renaissance + famously discussed tactics rulers should employ to maintain power + achieve political goals

  • argued it was sometimes necessary for leaders to use any means, including deception, to achieve authority

5
New cards

how does Wilson et al. (1996) define Machiavellianism + what are 3 key traits

personality traits referring to a strategy of social conduct that involves manipulating others for personal gain, often against the other’s self-interest. traits include:

  • use of a range of deliberate manipulation techniques, e.g. flattery/intimidation, for personal gain

  • engagement in unethical + counterproductive behaviours e.g. lying, theft + sabotage

  • possessing a cynical view of human nature + demonstrating little concern for the welfare of others above own wellbeing

6
New cards

how does Ames et al. (2006) define psychopathy + what are 3 key features

a drive to engage in impulsive or antisocial behaviour without empathy, anxiety or remorse. traits include:

  • impulsivity + thrill-seeking —> may engage in risky behaviour without regard for consequences

  • callousness + consistent lack of empathy

  • lack of emotional bonds + does not experience remorse for their behaviour

7
New cards

what is Jon Ronson’s ‘psychopath test’ and what 3 traits does he include as criteria

explores the proportion of psychopathic traits in the general population + outlines 3 ways to ‘spot’ a psychopath in day-to-day life:

  • glibness/superficial charm

  • cunning/manipulative behaviour

  • grandiose sense of self worth

8
New cards

what are two questionnaires commonly used to measure dark triad traits in the general population

  • the Dirty Dozen (Jonason + Webster, 2020) —> 12 item questionnaire

  • the Short Dark Triad (Jones + Paulhus, 2014) —> 27 item questionnaire

9
New cards

what are 3 criticisms of measures quantifying dark triad traits

  • social desirability bias associated with self-report measures → people high in these traits are more likely to lie, manipulate or ‘fake good’, so asking to rate themselves may not be reliable (especially considering some items = blatant)

  • short measures loose nuance —> convenient, but do not capture the complexity of each trait; much too general

    • e.g. many scales don’t capture narcissism’s fragile ego, which motivates seeking external validation

  • cultural assumptions —> many scales were developed on Western samples, so items may not capture how traits e.g. manipulation/narcissism are expressed in other cultures

10
New cards

how did Muris et al. (2017) investigate how gender affects propensity for dark triad traits

conducted meta analysis comprised of 65 samples —> dummy coded gender + computed effect sizes for the relationship between gender in each dark triad trait

  • found men generally display higher levels of dark triad traits relative to women

  • found medium-sized effect for psychopathy (.29), and small effect for narcissism (.15) + Machiavellianism (.16)

11
New cards

how did Klimstra et al. (2020) investigate how age affects propensity for dark triad traits + what do these findings imply

performed meta-analysis on multiple datasets on participants of various ages completing the Dirty Dozen scale + measures of agreeableness

  • found all 3 dark triad traits show a rise during adolescence

  • after early 20s, these traits seem to decrease, suggesting adult aging = associated with lower levels of these dark tendencies

suggests evidence for the maturity principle —> as people age, traits that are socially useful + acceptable on average tend to increase

<p>performed meta-analysis on multiple datasets on participants of various ages completing the Dirty Dozen scale + measures of agreeableness</p><ul><li><p>found all 3 dark triad traits show a rise during adolescence</p></li><li><p>after early 20s, these traits seem to decrease, suggesting adult aging = associated with lower levels of these dark tendencies</p></li></ul><p>suggests evidence for the maturity principle —&gt; as people age, traits that are socially useful + acceptable on average tend to increase</p><p></p>
12
New cards

how did Vedel + Thomsen (2017) investigate influence of degree choice on propensity for dark triad traits

Big 5 + Dark Triad traits were measured in a sample of students from 4 different academic majors:

  • psychology

  • economics/business

  • law

  • political science

mean scores on the dark triad traits were compared across academic courses by a 2×4 ANOVA

13
New cards

what were the results of Vedel + Thomsen (2017)’s study

  • there were no differences in psychopathy scores according to course

  • psychology students scored significantly lower on Machiavellianism than students on any other course assessed

  • psychology students scores significantly lower on narcissism than students studying economics/business

<ul><li><p>there were no differences in psychopathy scores according to course</p></li><li><p>psychology students scored significantly lower on Machiavellianism than students on any other course assessed</p></li><li><p>psychology students scores significantly lower on narcissism than students studying economics/business</p></li></ul><p></p>
14
New cards

how did Twenge et al. (2008) examine whether narcissism is increasing

investigated how narcissism scores have changed over time in university students through use of 85 samples between 1979-2006

  • found since 1982, narcissism scores have increased significantly

  • NPI scores were 30% higher in the most recent cohort compared to the first cohort → increase found more prominently among women

<p>investigated how narcissism scores have changed over time in university students through use of 85 samples between 1979-2006</p><ul><li><p>found since 1982, narcissism scores have increased significantly</p></li><li><p>NPI scores were 30% higher in the most recent cohort compared to the first cohort → increase found more prominently among women</p></li></ul><p></p>
15
New cards

what are 2 possible reasons as to why we are observing a rise in narcissism

  • social media use

  • changes in parenting styles

16
New cards

how did Reed et al. (2018) investigate the relationship between social media and narcissism + what were the findings

measured levels of narcissism + quantity of problematic internet use in participants aged 18-34

  • found higher amounts of time, frequency of posts (25% increase in particular) + number of followers on visual social media was significantly associated with higher levels of narcissism

  • relationship was only found with high proportion of visual social media

<p>measured levels of narcissism + quantity of problematic internet use in participants aged 18-34</p><ul><li><p>found higher amounts of time, frequency of posts (25% increase in particular) + number of followers on visual social media was significantly associated with higher levels of narcissism</p></li><li><p>relationship was only found with high proportion of visual social media</p></li></ul><p></p>
17
New cards

how did Brummelman et al. (2015) investigate how changes in parenting style was associated with narcissism

conducted longitudinal study monitoring ~550 children aged 7-12 + their parents over a 2-year period + measured 4 variables:

  • child self-esteem

  • child narcissism

  • parental warmth

  • parental overvaluation (believing their child is more special + entitled than other children)

found parental overevaluation predicted child narcissism, but not self-esteem, but parental warmth predicted the opposite

18
New cards

what is the unification hypothesis (Joanson et al., 2010)

the dark triad traits show strong, positive intercorrelations with one another, and have been found to load onto the same factor of during factor analysis

  • believes researchers should instead investigate a general ‘dark tendency’ rather than the separate subscales

<p>the dark triad traits show strong, positive intercorrelations with one another, and have been found to load onto the same factor of during factor analysis</p><ul><li><p>believes researchers should instead investigate a general ‘dark tendency’ rather than the separate subscales</p></li></ul><p></p>
19
New cards

what is the uniqueness hypothesis (Buckels et al., 2013)

the three traits have different patterns of associations with other traits + outcome variables —> instead suggests the traits are not enough to capture the dark side of human nature

  • recently has been proposed that the trait ‘subclinical’ sadism, the proneness to feel pleasant emotions while seeing others in pain, should be included to form a ‘dark tetrad’

<p>the three traits have different patterns of associations with other traits + outcome variables —&gt; instead suggests the traits are not enough to capture the dark side of human nature</p><ul><li><p>recently has been proposed that the trait ‘subclinical’ sadism, the proneness to feel pleasant emotions while seeing others in pain, should be included to form a ‘dark tetrad’</p></li></ul><p></p>
20
New cards

what is Kauffman et al. (2019)’s light triad + what are the 3 traits it contains

encompasses 3 qualities that embody a loving + beneficent orientation towards others —> 3 traits include:

  • Kantianism —> treating people as ends unto themselves (not just means); includes authenticity, honesty + investment in others

  • humanism —> valuing the dignity and worth of everyone, having respect for all; includes admiring + applauding the success of others

  • faith in humanity —> belief in the fundamental goodness of humans; includes being trusting, quick to forgive, looking for the best in others

21
New cards

what is the light triad scale (Kaufman, 2019) + what question are the items in it based on

based on ‘what would a loving + beneficent orientation toward others look like, in direct contrast to the everyday antagonistic orientation of dark traits’

  • 12 item scale consisting of questions conceptually opposite to dark triad ones, but also relating to forgiveness, trust, honesty + caring

  • the 3 traits emerged from factor analysis —> how the questions grouped together

<p>based on ‘what would a loving + beneficent orientation toward others look like, in direct contrast to the everyday antagonistic orientation of dark traits’</p><ul><li><p>12 item scale consisting of questions conceptually opposite to dark triad ones, but also relating to forgiveness, trust, honesty + caring</p></li><li><p>the 3 traits emerged from factor analysis —&gt; how the questions grouped together</p></li></ul><p></p>
22
New cards

what is the nomological network

the network of traits, qualities + outcomes you would expect to be associated with a trait to demonstrate that it’s a valid construct

  • helps to establish that a measure has construct validity —> the extent to which the measure behaves in a way consistent with our hypothesis + represents how well scores on instrument indicate that construct

23
New cards

in what 3 ways can you assess the nomological network (Kauffman et al., 2019)

  • convergent validity —> correlate the measure with measures you would expect to be highly correlated

  • discriminate validity —> correlate the measure with measures you would expect to not be correlated

  • predictive validity —> explore whether the traits correlate/predict outcomes in line with expected hypothesis

24
New cards

how did Kauffman et al. (2019) perform the nomological network of the light + dark triad and what 5 variables were included

aimed to explore correlations between light + dark triad traits —> used cross-sectional online survey with ~1500 participants. variables measured included

  • the light triad scale

  • the short dark triad

  • the big 5 personality factors

  • measures of wellbeing (life satisfaction, authenticity + self-esteem

  • measures of moral + social behaviour (empathy, compassion, selfishness + aggression)

25
New cards

what were the results of Kauffman et al. (2019)’s nomological network —> dark vs light triad

calculated light vs dark triad balance score by subtracting each person’s score on dark from light triad

  • the mean balance score of the entire sample was 1.3, suggesting the average person is tipped more towards the light triad

  • dark triad traits had a medium-effect negative correlation with light triad traits, suggesting lack of crossover between the two

  • extreme dark traits = found to be rarer than extreme light traits

<p>calculated light vs dark triad balance score by subtracting each person’s score on dark from light triad</p><ul><li><p>the mean balance score of the entire sample was 1.3, suggesting the average person is tipped more towards the light triad</p></li><li><p>dark triad traits had a medium-effect negative correlation with light triad traits, suggesting lack of crossover between the two</p></li><li><p>extreme dark traits = found to be rarer than extreme light traits</p></li></ul><p></p>
26
New cards

what were the results of Kauffman et al. (2019)’s nomological network —> correlations between light triad + big 5

  • scores with light triad correlated positively with open-mindedness, conscientiousness, extroversion + agreeableness

  • scores with light triad were negatively associated with neuroticism

  • agreeableness was most strongly associated with the light triad

27
New cards

what 2 other variables did Kauffman et al. (2019) identify as being positively associated with the dark triad

  • selfishness

  • self-enhancement values

28
New cards

what 3 other variables did Kauffman et al. (2019) identify as being negatively associated with the dark triad

  • life satisfaction

  • compassion + empathy

  • belief that others/one’s own self is good

29
New cards

what 5 other variables did Kauffman et al. (2019) identify as being positively associated with the light triad

  • acceptance of others

  • compassion + empathy

  • life satisfaction

  • positive enthusiasm

  • belief that others/one’s own self is good