1st and 2nd amendment

0.0(0)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Get a hint
Hint

Establishment Clause

Get a hint
Hint

First Amendment ban on favoring one religion of another, including belief. No national religion

Get a hint
Hint

Engel v. Vitale (clauses, ruling, effect)

Get a hint
Hint

Clauses: Establishment Clause, Selective Incorporation
Ruling: Struck down policy of mandatory prayer in NY school
Effect: Began striking down state practices on religion. Formed foundation of the Lemon Test

Card Sorting

1/25

Anonymous user
Anonymous user
flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

26 Terms

1
New cards

Establishment Clause

First Amendment ban on favoring one religion of another, including belief. No national religion

2
New cards

Engel v. Vitale (clauses, ruling, effect)

Clauses: Establishment Clause, Selective Incorporation
Ruling: Struck down policy of mandatory prayer in NY school
Effect: Began striking down state practices on religion. Formed foundation of the Lemon Test

3
New cards

Engel v. Vitale (background)

The State of New York authorized a short, voluntary prayer for recitation at the start of each school day

4
New cards

Lemon Test

Three-pronged rule used by the courts to determine whether the establishment clause is violated. (Prongs found in notes)

5
New cards

Free Exercise Clause

First Amendment requirement that the law cannot prevent people from practicing a certain religion

6
New cards

Does the Free Exercise Clause protect belief or conduct?

Belief

7
New cards

Wisconsin v. Yoder (clauses, holding, effect)

Clauses: Free Exercise Clause, Selective Incorporation
Holding: Struck down Wisconsin law requiring schooling to a certain age
Effect: Set precedent for religious exemption

8
New cards

Wisconsin v. Yoder (background)

Three Amish children stopped attending school at the end of 8th grade due to their parents' religious beliefs. Violated WI law.

9
New cards

Reactive not proactive

How SCOTUS handles cases. Only rule on an issue once it is brought before them.

10
New cards

Types of protected speech

Spoken, printed, news, symbolic, money

11
New cards

Tinker v. Des Moines (clauses, holding, effect)

Clauses: Free Speech Clause, Selective Incorporation
Holding: Armbands are a protected from of speech
Effect: Students retain 1st amendment rights in school unless it disrupts the learning practice

12
New cards

Tinker v. Des Moines (background)

Vietnam Era - Students want to wear black arm bands to school protesting the war. School will suspend students if they wear arm bands

13
New cards

Not protected under free speech

Slander, inciting lawlessness, too disruptive

14
New cards

Schenck v. United States (clause, holding, effect)

Clause: Free Speech Clause
Holding: 1st amendment does not protect speech that incites lawlessness
Effect: Established precedent that speech is not protected if it presents a clear and present danger

15
New cards

Schenck v. US (background)

Schenck encouraged people to oppose WWI and the draft. Charged under the Espionage Act

16
New cards

Watchdog of the government

The Press

17
New cards

Free Press Clause

This clause of the 1st Amendment states that Congress shall make no law that interferes with the actions of the press

18
New cards

Prior restraint

Government censorship of information before it is published or broadcast. Not allowed for the press. Exception is school newspapers

19
New cards

New York Times Co. v. US (clause, holding, effect)

Clause: Free Press Clause
Holding: Nixon had no right to prohibit the publication of the articles
Effect: Prior restraint is presumed to always be unconstitutional

20
New cards

New York Times Co. v. US (background)

NYT was releasing the classified Pentagon Papers and Nixon ordered them to stop

21
New cards

Topics of the 2nd amendment

Militias, gun ownership

22
New cards

DC v. Heller

Court ruled that a DC law banning hand guns was unconstitutional. Guns are individual rights, not required to be in the militia

23
New cards

Purpose of owning a firearm

Self-defense. rooted in american tradition

24
New cards

McDonald v. Chicago (clauses, holding, effect)

Clauses: Right to Bear Arms, Selective Incorporation
Holding: Chicago could not limit sales of handguns
Effect: Cities/states cannot ban handguns outright

25
New cards

McDonald v. Chicago (background)

Chicago law prevents McDonald from owning a handgun to protect his home.

26
New cards

Debate over guns today

Are assault rifles necessary for defense