1/17
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Empire and naval strategy
Difficult except for places like Athens where islands were close
Navigation difficult
In battle, ships would just ram each other, which was ineffective because of proximity and loss of wind
Age of Exploration
Beginning of maritime empire era
Portugal, Spain, UK, Netherlands, Sweden
Mercantilist monarchies
Battle of Trafalgar (1805)
French and Spanish vs British
Napoleon trying to defeat British Navy to have control of Europe
British troops more disciplined so able to win
Britain once again world power —> history turns on naval power
Relevance of US Civil War
First industrial era war
Britain supporting South b/c they saw it as weakening US overall industrial power
Worried about rising US power
Use of coal for energy limiting distance navy can go
Turrets
Created by John Ericsson
Firepower no longer confined to port or starboard
Mahan’s background
Trying to explain value of Navy to Washington
Shrunk after civil war
No great leaders b/c no ranks to rise
Wanted US fleet to be equal to UK
Saw that all great powers were naval ones
Napoleonic Wars transformed by British navy
Overlooks Russia
Accused of imperialism b/c of focus on gaining ports for re-coaling
Scramble for Africa
Africa least colonized continent of 19th century, esp. interior
Desire for coaling stations
Germany now unified and seeking great power status
Impact of Mahan’s work
Cleveland chooses to not shut down Naval Institute
Germany and Japan decide to build navies
Royal Navy decides it needs more resources
Naval offense and defense
Shift to defensive tactics
Germany building large fleet so UK not dominant
Navy to protect ports vs control sea lanes
Mahan - sea lanes
Mahan valued offensive tactics
Maritime trade most effective for economic power before railways
Win wars by strangling enemy’s economy
Panama Canal
Important for trade but Caribbean is now strategically important area
Spanish-American War for control of Cuba
System stability
No incentive or negative reward for starting war
Incentive to start war vs be struck first
Strategic stability
No benefit to anyone going to war
Crisis stability
Elevated probability other side will strike —> you’re pushed to strike first
Geopolitics
Idea that geography tells us why some countries gain power
Mackinder’s background
Studying German railroad expansion, believes strategy should focus on land > sea
Less obstacles
Can move resources
Strategic retreat
Large countries easier to defend b/c more room to retreat
Ideal country shape is circle
Vulnerability is at borders so want high ratio of area:perimeter
Have deserts at borders b/c difficult to cross
Worst country: Pakistan
No room to retreat, pop. centered on border
Mackinder’s world island
Land travel now as easy as sea
E. Europe as pivot b/c of resources
US and UK don’t want one alliance controlling pivot
Germany: lebensraum
US: counterbalance Soviets (post-WWII)
British still believing power coming from Navy
Mackinder and geographical determinism
He is NOT one — also believes in industrial might of nations