1/47
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Utilitarianism
A moral theory holding that the right action is the one that produces the greatest total happiness for the greatest number
Consequentialism
The view that moral rightness depends only on the consequences of an action not the intentions or the character behind it
Intrinsic Value
Something valuable in itself for its own sake such as happiness or pleasure according to utilitarians
Instrumental Value
Something valuable only as a means to something else like money or doctors tools
Happiness as Intrinsically Valuable Utilitarian Claim
Utilitarians argue happiness is the only thing always valued for its own sake and all other values depend on producing happiness
Experience Machine Nozick
A thought experiment asking whether you would plug into a machine that gives perfect pleasure raising doubts that pleasure alone is all we value
Lesson of the Experience Machine
Suggests we value reality growth authenticity and relationships not just pleasurable feelings challenging utilitarianism
Act Utilitarianism
Judge each action individually based on whether it maximizes happiness in that specific situation
Rule Utilitarianism
Judge actions by whether they follow rules that generally maximize happiness if widely adopted
Difference Act vs Rule Utilitarianism
Act focuses on single actions rule focuses on general moral rules that produce the most happiness overall
Objection Counterintuitive Consequences
Utilitarianism may justify harming innocent people lying breaking promises or sacrificing individuals if it increases total happiness
Response 1 to Objection Deny the Intuition
Some utilitarians say our moral intuitions are unreliable and outcomes are what matter so weird consequences may still be right
Response 2 to Objection Appeal to Rule Utilitarianism
Rule utilitarians argue such harmful actions usually break rules that reduce long term happiness so they should be avoided
Response 3 to Objection Modify the Theory
Some adjust utilitarianism by adding constraints or rights to prevent extreme or unjust consequences
Utilitarianism on the Trolley Problem
Utilitarians say pull the lever because saving five produces more total happiness than saving one
Utilitarianism Strengths
Simple clear impartial and focused on reducing suffering and maximizing well being for everyone equally
Utilitarianism Weaknesses
Can justify injustice demands predicting consequences ignores intentions and may treat people as mere numbers in a calculation
Hedonism Utilitarian Meaning
The view that happiness or pleasure is the only intrinsic good all else is valuable only when it contributes to well being
Cost Benefit Reasoning
A utilitarian method of weighing total happiness against total unhappiness to determine the morally right action
Impartiality Requirement
Everyone’s happiness counts equally no one’s well being matters more just because of who they are
Exam Requirement Intrinsic vs Instrumental Value
Must explain distinction clearly with examples and relate it to why utilitarians value happiness intrinsically
Exam Requirement Act vs Rule Utilitarianism
Must be able to define each distinguish them and explain how rule utilitarianism avoids some objections to act utilitarianism
Exam Requirement Experience Machine
Must know what it is why Nozick proposes it and how it challenges pure happiness based theories
Exam Requirement Counterintuitive Objection
Must explain why utilitarianism sometimes seems to justify morally wrong actions and give three utilitarian replies