1/24
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
What are the 3 main growth modes?
Internal (organic) growth, external growth (acquisitions), and alliances (cooperation).
What is internal (organic) growth?
Development of resources, capabilities, and offerings inside the company.
What is external growth?
Acquisition of already existing and combined production facilities (buying firms or assets).
What are alliances?
Collaborative arrangements where firms share or exchange resources while remaining independent.
Advantages of internal growth?
Strengthens and protects core competencies
Enables choosing development speed
Optimizes production resources
Ensures organizational stability
Matches financial capacity
Disadvantages of internal growth?
Long development time
Uncertainty about capabilities or asset combinations
Increases market supply (may intensify competition)
When is internal growth the best option?
When it is less costly than M&A
When no target or partner exists
When technology is mastered internally
When launching new/breakthrough products
Advantages of external growth?
Very rapid expansion
Overcomes barriers to entry
Certainty of existing know-how
Avoids increasing industry supply
Access to rare/unique resources
Potential to neutralize competitors
Disadvantages of external growth?
Cultural and organizational resistance
Very costly — high financial needs
Must find an appropriate target
Risk of overpaying
Regulatory constraints
Uncertainty about synergies (integration risk)
When is external growth recommended?
When technology is not mastered internally
When distressed firms possess key know-how
In mature sectors (consolidation)
When targets are available
When deregulation allows cross-border acquisitions
When financial resources are strong
Non-economic motives for M&A?
Avoid hostile takeovers
Find new growth drivers
Achieve critical mass
Hubris or imitation
Economic reasons for M&A?
Value creation: synergies, economies of scale, market power
Access to resources
Value extraction: buying undervalued assets
Common mistakes in M&A?
Overestimating synergies
Underestimating integration costs
Ignoring culture & human factors
Overpaying
Poor strategic fit
Ignoring regulators
Weak post-merger integration (PMI)
What is a strategic alliance?
Cooperation between independent firms to share/exchange resources to achieve a joint objective, while remaining independent externally.
Advantages of alliances?
Shared R&D efforts
Shared investments
Shared risks
Access to complementary resources
Flexibility
Overcoming barriers to entry
Disadvantages of alliances?
Resistance to change
Complex cooperation management
Conflict between joint vs individual interests
Risk of opportunistic behavior
Risk of “Trojan horse” (partner gaining too much knowledge)
What is an additive alliance?
Alliance between similar firms combining similar resources.
Examples of additive alliances?
Joint procurement groups
Joint R&D
Joint product design
SFR + Bouygues network sharing
Advantages of additive alliances?
Economies of scale
Field savings
Reaching critical mass
Risk sharing
What is a complementary alliance?
Alliance between firms with different resources/skills.
Examples of complementary alliances?
Vertical collaborations
Competitors with different competencies (airline code-sharing)
Startup–large company partnerships
Cross-industry collaborations (HP–Intel)
Benefits of complementary alliances?
Access to unavailable resources or capabilities
What are the main types of alliances?
Joint ventures (creating shared entities)
Consortia
EIGs/EEIGs (economic interest groups)
Partial mergers
Cooperation agreements without capital ties
Cross-licensing agreements
Financial alliances (cross-shareholdings)
Key factors when choosing a growth method?
Firm skills
Sector characteristics
Strategic objectives
Managerial expertise
Financial situation
Level of trust with partners
Common mistakes in alliance analysis?
Overestimating synergies
Underestimating coordination costs
Ignoring cultural fit
Underestimating partner dependency
Poor IP/knowledge management
Focusing only on short-term results