1/15
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
What is validity?
Refers to the extent to which an observed effect is genuine
What is internal validity?
The extent to which a test measures what it is supposed to measure and effects are due to the manipulation of the IV and not some other factor e.g confounding variable.
What is external validity?
The extent to which results can be generalised beyond the study e.g other settings or other people.
What are three forms of external validity?
1. Population validity
2. Temporal validity
3. Ecological validity
What is population validity?
A form of external validity - the extent to which findings from a study can be generalised to the general population.
What is temporal validity?
A form of external validity- the extent to which findings from a study can be generalised to other particular time periods
What is ecological validity?
A form of external validity - the extent to which findings from a study can be generalised to other settings (the real world and life)
When do you have high ecological validity?
When there is realistic setting and high mundane realism
What is mundane realism?
Refers to how realistic the task in the experiment is- if an experiment has low mundane realism then the task is not similar to real life and this leads to low external validity.
What are two ways of assessing validity?
1. Face validity- independent expert looks at the measure and the extent to which test items look like what the test claims to measure
2. Concurrent validity- the extent to which a psychological measure relates to an existing similar measure. Give same group a similar, established measure and check to see if both sets of scores are positively correlated
Define face validity:
When an independent expert looks at the measure being used and assesses whether it will measure what it has set out to measure.
Define concurrent validity:
Comparing the new procedure with a similar procedure that has been done before, where validity has already been established.
List three ways to improve validity in research experiments :
Use a control group
Standardised procedures
Use of single and double blind procedures
List two ways to improve validity in observations:
Minimal input from the observer
Ensure behavioural categories are not too broad, overlapping or ambiguous.
List two ways to improve validity in questionnaires:
Include a lie scale
Ensure all ptpts responses are anonymous
List two ways to improve validity in qualitative methods:
Research may have to demonstrate the interpretive validity - researchers interpretation of events matches those of their ptpts
Triangulation - use of numbers of different sources as evidence