Lecture 2: Identifying Atypical Development

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/35

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

36 Terms

1
New cards

atypical development

  • the extremes of individual differences in development 

-statistical deviation from the norm

-includes advanced and delayed development

-associated with neurodevelopmental conditions

2
New cards

difficulties with defining atypical development

  • individual differences in the rate of development

  • individual differences in people’s traits, strengths and weaknesses

3
New cards

typical development

-normal ability level at start

-increases and progresses with age

4
New cards

delayed development

-gap between this and normal development

-gap continues to grow as age increases

-child has weaker abilities than normal development

5
New cards

delayed development with catch up

-starts at same ability level as normal development

-as child gets older there is some delay in ability levels

-catches up in ability as time passes → delay is resolved

6
New cards

lower starting point development

-child’s development starts from a much lower point to begin with than normal development

-develops at same rate as a typically developed child

-never catches up to ability level as started at a much lower ability level

7
New cards

advanced development

-starts at same ability point as normal development

-rapid growth at a much faster rate than expected of a typical child

-maintains this stronger ability over time

8
New cards

different patterns of atypical development

9
New cards

developmental regression

-period where a particular skill is developing along a typical trajectory → but then child stops developing and loses aspects of this skill 

-typically seen is ASC and/or intellectual disability 

-most often language and motor skills 

10
New cards

multiple domains of development

-adaptive behaviour

-social

-cognitive

-physical

-motor skills

11
New cards

adaptive behaviour (domain of development)

  • ability to work

  • functional decision making

  • personal safety

  • managing money

  • personal responsibility

  • independence

  • daily living skills

12
New cards

social (domain of development)

  • gestures

  • reciprocal eye contact

  • empathy

  • verbal communication

  • social interactions

  • non-verbal communication

  • turn-taking

  • emotional IQ

13
New cards

cognitive (domain of development)

  • IQ

  • attention

  • language

  • executive function

  • numerical ability

  • memory

14
New cards

physical (domain of development)

  • facial dysmorphism 

  • microcephaly 

  • macrocephaly 

  • physical features 

15
New cards

motor skills (domain of development)

  • fine/gross motor skills

  • balance

  • coordination

  • activity level

16
New cards

normal distribution 

-obtained by testing many participants 

-for may variables samples from the population generate a normal distribution 

-bell shaped curve

17
New cards

identifying atypical development

-group comparisons against a representative sample

-choose appropriate control group

18
New cards

profile of child’s abilities

-understanding of child’s abilities cannot be built without identifying strengths and weaknesses

-strengths can be subjective or relative:

  • something they’re good at compared to other skills

  • not necessarily a strength compared to other people

19
New cards

specific experimental design (cognition - measuring development)

 -investigate a specific research question or hypothesis, target specific behaviours 

-format can vary widely depending on the research question and methodology 

-can compare results with a matched control group 

20
New cards

standardised tests (cognition - measuring development)

-designed to measure knowledge or skills in a consistent and comparable way across a large population

-fixed format with specific instructions, questions and scoring procedures

-scores can be standardised → given a value that indicated how well they performed against everyone who has taken the test

21
New cards

comparing specific and standardised tests

-standardised tests aim to measure broader knowledge or skills → experiments aim to test a specific skill or test hypothesis

-standardised tests are broad, covering a range of topics or skills → experiments focus on specific research question 

-standardised tests aim to generalise results to a larger population → experiments have limited generalisability depending on sample and conditions 

22
New cards

Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC)

-widely used intelligence test

-aged 6-16

-measures:

  • verbal comprehension index

  • fluid reasoning index

  • visual spatial index

  • processing speed index

  • working memory index

23
New cards

verbal comprehension index (WISC)

-measures a child’s ability to understand and use language and their verbal reasoning skills 

24
New cards

visual spatial index (WISC)

-measures ability to perceive, analyse and manipulate visual information 

25
New cards

fluid reasoning index (WISC)

-measures ability to solve novel problems and think flexibly

-abstract reasoning

26
New cards

working memory index (WISC)

-measures ability to hold information in mind

27
New cards

processing speed index (WISC)

-measures ability to quickly and accurately process information

28
New cards

tasks of the WISC

-full test measures the Full Scale IQ (FSIQ), which is split into: 

  • performance IQ (PIQ)

  • verbal IQ (VIQ)

29
New cards

Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales (measuring development - adaptive behaviour)

-semi-structured interview carried out with parent/caregiver/teacher 

-measures: 

  • communication 

  • daily living skills 

  • socialisation 

  • motor skills 

  • maladaptive behaviour

30
New cards

Wechsler Nonverbal Scale of Ability (tests for non-verbal participants)

-assesses non-verbal reasoning and problem solving skills

-aged 4-21

-uses visual stimuli and requires minimal verbal instructions

31
New cards

Leiter International Performance Scale (tests for non-verbal participants)

-assesses cognitive abilities

-aged 3-75

-matching pictures, completing patterns, solving mazes → assess different aspects of intelligence

-useful for assessing those with autism, language impairments or hearing impairments 

32
New cards

Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (tests for younger participants)

-aged 1-42 months

-cognitive, motor, language, social-emotional and adaptive behaviour

-observation of motor skills, tests of cognition and social interaction

33
New cards

Infant-Toddler Developmental Assessment (tests for younger participants)

-birth to 36 months

-those at risk of developmental delays or conditions

-cognitive, motor, language, social-emotional, and adaptive behaviour

-observation, parental report and standardised tasks

-often used in early intervention programs to identify those who require additional support

34
New cards

standardised scores (interpreting task performance)

-add scores together to create raw score

-convert raw score to standardised score

-this converts the raw score to a value that represents how a participant has performed to others of the same age/gender

-removes individual differences and generates a score that can be compared across participants

35
New cards

look-up table (interpreting task performance)

-after completing a test and obtaining a raw score, experimenter can use a look-up table based on appropriate representative sample to identify a scaled score

-can create a standardised score by making raw score into t-score

36
New cards

benefits of using standardised scores (interpreting task performance)

-enables clinicians to standardise performance across different groups 

-provide a common language for discussing test performance regardless of how the actual test is designed 

-easily interpretable 

-no one set way of standardising but all allow the same comparison