1/34
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
4th Amendment
protects citizens against unlawful search and seizure of evidence
Search
occurs when police intrude on a suspect’s reasonable expectation of privacy
seizure
occurs when police interfere with a suspect’s possessory rights of property
persons, houses, paper, personal effects
4 constitutionally protected locations
gather evidence, disarm suspects for self protection, make an inventory of property
three main purposes for a search are ______
full search
done when police gather evidence
always require either a search warrant or a recognized exception to the warrant requirement
limited weapons search
done to disarm suspects for self-protection
inventory search
done when an officer needs to see what is in property that they have impounded (i.e. car)
criminal activity has taken place, specific objects associated with that crime exist and that they will be found at the place to be searched
probable cause for a search warrant requires facts sufficient to justify a reasonable person to believe three things: _______
it’s enough that the evidence will probably be there.
particularized description of the place to be searched and the things to be seized
4th ammendment requires that search warrants contain a ________
these requirements guard against general searches
scope
the warrant’s description of the place to be searched defines the permissible _______ of the search
curtilage
police typically describe the premises by address, which extends search authority to the residence, the yard, and all structures and vehicles inside the __________
intensity
controlled by the warrant’s description of the objects to be seized. Pertaints to whether police may open drawers or containers, read mail, etc.
with consent
as an incident to a lawful arrest
when police have probable cause to believe a motor vehicle contains evidence that is subject to seizures
when exigent circumstances are present
4 exceptions that exist for the requirement that warrants are necessary for a full-blown search
consent to a search
a warrant is not required to search premises if the suspect or a fellow occupant consents to the search
may be rescinded
once consent is granted it ________. Police do not have to advise people of their right to refuse.
incident to a lawful arrest
a _____ custodial _______ carries automatic authority to search the person of the arrestee AND everything within arm’s reach for weapons and criminal evidence, with no reason to believe that either will be found.
chimel v California
case that established search upon lawful arrest is limited to area in suspect’s immediate control
to prevent the arrestee from gaining access to a weapon and from concealing or destroying evidence
Purpose of a search incident to a lawful arrest
not restricted in the same way as a pat-down
carroll doctrine
police may conduct a warrantless search of a vehicle whenever they have probable cause to believe that is contains contraband or evidence of criminal activity.
vehicles can be moved during the time it would take to get a search warrant
justification for the carroll doctrine
fleeting targets exception
recognizes it would be unrealistic for an officer to obtain a warrant while a vehicle is on a roadway, and permits a police search under certain circumstances.
exigent circumstances and hot persuit
police are allowed to enter private premises without a search wrrant when they are confronted with _________ that create an urgent need for action i.e. someone calling for help.
hot pursuit of a fleeing suspect
threats to safety
threatened destruction of evidence
3 main circumstances that fall within exigent circumstances warrant exception
action immediately necessary to address the exigency that justified the entry
exigent circumstances searches are limited in scope and intensity to _________
i.e. police fearful of destruction of evidence can enter to secure the premises, but cannot search without a warrant
Frisk
police may perform a limited weapons search or _____ when they have reason to believe that a person whom they have lawfully detained for investigation may be armed and dangerous
Terry v Ohio
court case that determined the standard for brief stop and _______ based on reasonable suspicion (terry-type stop)
protective sweep
when police make an arrest inside a residence, they may perform a cursory visual inspection of closets and spaces immediately adjoining the place of arrest in which cohorts who pose a danger to the officer might be hiding
inventory searches
an impoundment occurs when police take custody of property for reasons other than to use as evidence (i.e. vehicles and belongings taken from arrestees before placing them in a detention facility are most often impounded)
investigative in nature
the 4th amendment allows the warrantless search of all lawfully impounded property, since this search is not ________ __ _______, but administrative.
they are done to protect the owner’s property while in police custody and to protect police from false claims of lost or stolen property
plain view exception
police are allowed to seize objects for use as evidence without a search warrant describing them when the __________ to the warrant requirement applies
the initial intrusion is lawful
it is immediately apparent
the sighting is coincidental
cannot move objects to see items hidden from view
plain view exception requirement is allowed when these 4 things are true: ______
exclusionary rule
entitles the defendant to have all evidence obtained as a result of the violation excluded from their trial
Weeks vs. US
forms basis of exclusionary rule where evidence illegally seized by police cannot be used in a trial and only applied to federal officers
Mapp v. Ohio
applies exclusionary rule to the states