Family and Gender Roles Exam 2

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 2 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/24

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

25 Terms

1
New cards

biological perspective on gender/roles

Studies the process of social change and variationĀ 

Men and woman have different biological ā€œinvestmentsā€ in their childrenĀ 

Men have ancient evolutionary tendency towards promiscuity and away from childcare and women more towards monogamy and child-rearingĀ 

2
New cards

"social" sex differences

Physical differences - strength, heightĀ 

Male-centric symbols and male gender based expressionsĀ Ā 

Women - the perceived weaker sex - living longer than menĀ 

Men in more physical jobs than womenĀ 

Cosmetic surgery to enhance sex differences or ā€œideal gender imageā€Ā 

Gender dysphoria - can be a diagnosis if incongruence between gender identity and assigned sex causes distress in a person’s lifeĀ 

Legality of gender identity definitionsĀ Ā 

Gender socialization in families, school, media, religionĀ 

FashionĀ is just one way we turn biological sex into social gender identity and expressionĀ 

3
New cards

Sexual Dimorphism

physical differences between the sexes. Humans show low levels of this compared to other species

4
New cards

sexual orientation types

Heterosexuality - sexual attraction towards members of the opposite sexĀ 

Homosexuality - sexual attraction towards members of the same sexĀ 

Bisexuality - sexual attraction towards members of both sexesĀ 

Asexuality - lack of sexual attraction toward anyoneĀ 

5
New cards

queer theory approach

stresses the fluidity and diversity of sexual orientations and behaviors and rejects science’s attempt to fit people into narrow classifications of sexualityĀ 

6
New cards

changes in sexual orientation theories over time

Changing societal ā€œnormsā€ and attitudes towards sex for procreating purposes and sex for pleasure; includes advent of birth control optionsĀ 

Social construct stigmatization of homosexuality continues to label this as undesirable or deviant todayĀ 

Sex outside of marriage has reduced social penaltiesĀ 

Growing independence of young adults living away from home at younger agesĀ 

Improving health and education around sexual desires and behaviorsĀ 

Acceptance for women to have sexual desires, even though the double standard still existsĀ 

Sexuality is socially constructedĀ 

7
New cards

social scripts

commonly understood patterns of interaction that serves as a model of behavior in familiar situationsĀ 

8
New cards

Why are social scripts unclear in dating

Demise of dating system as the primary mode in relationship formation - lacking the older ā€œphasesā€ of dating from time of meeting to commitmentĀ Ā 

Increasing acceptance of living togetherĀ Ā 

Incorporation of divorced and older singles into dating sceneĀ 

Technology and dating – apps, people more in their phones, 1 in 4 use online dating sitesĀ 

Significance of ā€œdatingā€ or making a commitment, having that ā€œlabelā€Ā Ā 

Who takes the lead in dating situations? When are you ā€œin a relationshipā€?Ā 

ā€œSituationshipā€Ā 

ā€œHooking upā€ = casual sexual encounters without explicit commitment or exclusivityĀ Ā 

Same sex relationships - no established social scripts to follow, negative social stigmas, public laws and regulationsĀ 

9
New cards

retreat from marriage

Also referred to as ā€œmeā€ culture Ā 

started appearing in family research in the early 1980s. Marriage rates have continued to drop sinceĀ 

David Popenoe famously concluded 30 years ago: ā€œQuite clearly, in this age of the ā€˜me-generation,’ the individual rather than the family increasingly comes firstā€Ā 

In this view the fact that young people today are less likely to marry implies that they simply care more about themselves—and less about others—than they did in the pastĀ 

Individualism is weakening the social bonds that hold people togetherĀ 

Debatable if this is actually the cause of declining marriage ratesĀ 

10
New cards

Male provider ideal

The father as an economic provider and authority figure for his children.Ā 

Older concept of men being the provider and the authority figure in the household Ā 

Successful employment and making career a priority was the criteria for a good fatherĀ 

11
New cards

Involved father ideal

The father as an emotional, nurturing companion who bonds with his children as well as providing for them.Ā 

The new emotional and nurturing father who bonds and cares for his childrenĀ 

Parenting is not as one sided as it was years agoĀ 

Today child development experts promote the emotional bonds that children have to not only mothers, but to fathers as wellĀ 

12
New cards

Divorce

has increased and changed perceptions about marriage in the last centuryĀ 

People are reconning with individual happiness vs family commitmentsĀ 

13
New cards

Separation

formal or informal separation of spouses into different householdsĀ 

14
New cards

Marital dissolution

end of a marriage through permanent separation or divorceĀ 

15
New cards

Divorce definition

legal dissolution of a marriage at the state levelĀ 

16
New cards

Annulment

a legal or religious determination that the marriage was never validĀ 

17
New cards

Causes of Divorce

  • individual unhappiness, spend less time alone together, disagree frequently, heated arguments, unhealthy relationshipsĀ 

  • Employment and independence - who is earning the money, who will be the provider(s) after a divorce, ā€œindependence effectā€ of women’s employmentĀ Ā 

  • Financial issuesĀ 

  • Infertility, kids, children’s disabilities, step-childrenĀ 

  • Infidelity, physical and emotionalĀ 

  • IrresponsibilityĀ 

  • NeglectĀ 

  • Incompatible livesĀ 

18
New cards

Consequences of divorce

  • Adult happiness - divorced people generally less happy than married people, people who divorce are generally slightly unhappier to begin withĀ Ā 

  • Mental stress, sleep problems, depression, trouble concentratingĀ 

  • Stigma of being a failureĀ 

  • Economic status - inadvertently impacting women more than men - the feminization of poverty as most children stay with the motherĀ 

  • Children’s well being - implications of moving forward with both parents (common events such as birthdays, graduations, weddings etc)Ā 

19
New cards

Divorce effect on children

Some parents try to prevent or delay divorce for the children’s sake—to spare them the disruption, potential financial loss, and even shame of a family breakup. Other parents, however, want a divorce for the children’s sake—to keep them from living under the cloud of constant bickering or to remove them from the care of an irresponsible (or even abusive) spouseĀ 

Children’s experience of when parents stay together and ā€œhate each otherā€ vs when parents split up: Much worse when they stay togetherĀ 

Historically parents have made decisions for children’s sake, and not necessarily in their best interests

20
New cards

Blended families

Changing assumptions about family roles and where the children liveĀ 

Step parenting, step siblings, half siblingsĀ 

21
New cards

Boundary ambiguity

situations where family members don’t know/don’t agree on their new roles within the new family dynamicsĀ 

22
New cards

Challenges for blended families

  • Who gets the kids?Ā 

  • RemarriageĀ 

  • Parenting styles

23
New cards

Who was Lilly Ledbetter?

a women's equality activist whose fight for pay equity led to passage of the monumental Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009Ā 

24
New cards

Lily Ledbetter’s story

Ledbetter was hired as a supervisor at a Goodyear tire plant in Gadsden, Ala., in 1979.

Years later,Ā she discovered through an anonymous note left in her mailbox that she was receiving less pay than her male co-workers who worked the same position.

Filed a charge with the EEOC that began a 10 yearlong battle. She won the suit in 2003 and was awarded more than $3 million, but the amount was reduced to $300,000 because of a statutory cap and $60,000 in back pay.

Goodyear appealed the decision to the Supreme Court, arguing that Ledbetter could only win damages or back pay for the 180 days prior to the filing of her claim. In 2007, the high court agreed in a 5-4 ruling.

Two years later Congress passed theĀ Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009, which amended the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and allows workers to "obtain relief, including recovery of back pay, for up to two years preceding the filing of the charge."

President Barack Obama signed the measure into law on Jan. 29, 2009, the first bill he signed as president.Ā 

25
New cards

Lilly Ledbetter’s Impact

Made a considerable impact on wage discrimination cases and has helped to narrow the gender pay gap - not eliminating it completely. The Act also paved the way for other legislative measures like prohibiting employers from asking about salary historyĀ 

Explore top flashcards

APUSH World War 2
Updated 1076d ago
flashcards Flashcards (163)
Los Viajes
Updated 1158d ago
flashcards Flashcards (69)
Science 3/28/23
Updated 1027d ago
flashcards Flashcards (31)
Avancemos 3 3.1
Updated 1053d ago
flashcards Flashcards (50)
Population
Updated 631d ago
flashcards Flashcards (37)
APUSH World War 2
Updated 1076d ago
flashcards Flashcards (163)
Los Viajes
Updated 1158d ago
flashcards Flashcards (69)
Science 3/28/23
Updated 1027d ago
flashcards Flashcards (31)
Avancemos 3 3.1
Updated 1053d ago
flashcards Flashcards (50)
Population
Updated 631d ago
flashcards Flashcards (37)