analytic
a proposition that is true or false in virtue of the meanings of the words
synthetic
a proposition that is not analytic but true or false depending on how the world is
a priori
knowledge of propositions that do not require sense experience to be known to be true or false
a posteriori
knowledge of propositions that can only be known to be true or false through sense experience
innate
knowledge or ideas in some way built into the structure of the mind rather than gained from sense experience
innatism
some of our concepts are innate in the structure of the mind, not gained from sense experience
this knowledge is a priori, universal, clear and distinct, and there from birth
empiricism
theory that there can be no a priori knowledge of synthetic propositions about the world
Hume’s Fork
we can have knowledge of just two types of claim, relations between ideas, and matters of fact
idea
an object of perception, thought or understanding
locke refers to a complete thought such as a proposition, a sensation, or a concept
complex idea
an idea derived from two or more simple ideas
simple idea
a single, uniform conception, with nothing distinguishable within it
impression
what we are immediately and directly aware of, can either be impressions of sensation (from senses) or impressions of reflection (from our mind like emotions)
matters of fact
states of affairs, how the world is and knows through experience and induction, especially causal inference
reflection
Locke: our experience of the internal operations of our minds gained through introspection and awareness of what the mind is doing
relations of ideas
established by pure thought or reflection and are intuitively and demonstratively certain. the negation of a relation of ideas is a contradiction
cartesian circle
Descartes cannot rely on clear and distinct ideas before proving God exists, but cannot prove this without relying on clear and distinct ideas
clear and distinct ideas
clear is present and accessible to the attentive mind
distinct is clear and also sharply separated from other ideas so that ever part of it is clear
the cogito
‘I think therefore I am’ - Descartes’ proof of existence replying on our ability to doubt
the cogito is a priori intuition, a necessary truth, and known clearly and distinctly
rationalism
theory that there can be a priori knowledge of synthetic propositions about the world gained through rational intuition and reasoning
waves of doubt
arguments supporting Descartes’ scepticism. argument from illusion doubts always believing what our senses tell us. argument from dreaming doubts all sense perception and therefore the nature of reality. evil demon argument doubts all judgement including the existence of God
intuition and deduction thesis
we can have undeniable foundational truths and deduce from these some knowledge a priori