bodkins ch5: overview of court system and legal process

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/116

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 3:58 PM on 2/3/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

117 Terms

1
New cards

Which of the following best explains the relationship between the Due Process Clauses of the 5th and 14th Amendments?

Both the 5th and 14th Amendments guarantee due process, but the 5th limits the federal government while the 14th applies to the states.

2
New cards

What is due process?

A constitutional guarantee that government must follow fair procedures and respect fundamental rights before depriving a person of life, liberty, or property.

3
New cards

Where are due process protections rooted?

Both process protections rooted in the Fifth (federal application) and Fourteenth (application to the states) Amendments.

4
New cards

What is Procedural Due Process?

The fairness of methods used by government

5
New cards

What does Procedural Due Process require?

Requires
(1) adequate notice of charges or actions

(2) a meaningful opportunity to be heard

and (3) a decision by a neutral and impartial decision-maker.

6
New cards

What does Procedural Due Process ensure?

Ensures government acts openly, consistently, and predictably.

7
New cards

What is the Void for Vagueness Doctrine?

Procedurally-related application stating that a law must be clear before the government can punish someone under it.

8
New cards

What is Substantive Due Process?

The fairness of the laws themselves

9
New cards

What does Substantive Due Process protect?

Protects

(1) fundamental rights from government interference, even if procedures are followed

(2) rights even if not explicitly stated in the Constitution

and (3) whether laws unjustifiably infringe on liberty.

10
New cards

What is the Incorporation Doctrine?

Content-related application defining fundamental rights that must be protected at every level of government, using the Fourteenth Amendment to make the Bill of Rights apply to the states.

11
New cards

Why is the judiciary called the “passive branch”?

The judiciary = the “passive branch” (cannot initiate action, must wait for cases).

12
New cards

Where does the judiciary’s power come from?

Power comes from interpreting law and applying it → affects all Americans.

13
New cards

What did John Milton argue about truth and censorship?

Truth emerges from open debate, and censorship harms the discovery of truth.

14
New cards

What did John Locke argue about truth?

Truth is discoverable through fact, reason, and evidence.

15
New cards

Why do courts matter for communication professionals?

Court rulings determine the limits of speech, press, advertising, and digital rights.

16
New cards

How do journalists and media professionals interact with court rulings?

Journalists and media professionals constantly navigate court-defined boundaries.

17
New cards

What is the adversarial process?

Legal disputes are resolved by two opposing parties presenting their case.

18
New cards

Who decides the outcome in the adversarial process?

Judge or jury decides outcome of case based on evidence, law, and arguments.

19
New cards

How does the adversarial process ensure fairness?

Both sides have equal opportunity to present evidence (facts).

20
New cards

What is an example of the adversarial process in government?

Congress debates laws in public.

21
New cards

What is an example of the adversarial process in elections?

Voters evaluate competing “versions of truth.”

22
New cards

What is the role of lawyers in the adversarial process?

Lawyers are advocates who present facts and law.

23
New cards

What is the role of judges in the adversarial process?

Judges are interpreters and procedural referees.

24
New cards

What is the role of juries in the adversarial process?

Juries are the community voice and fact-finders (or judge for bench trials).

25
New cards

When is a jury required in criminal trials?

The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to a jury in serious criminal cases with potential punishment of more than six months in jail, judge cannot deny if serious

26
New cards

What is the purpose of a jury in criminal trials?

Protection against government abuse by allowing citizens, not just officials, to decide guilt.

27
New cards

What is the jury’s role in criminal trials?

The jury is a “fact-finder” that decides what happened based on evidence (facts).

28
New cards

When may a jury be used in civil trials?

When facts are disputed or the case is serious.

29
New cards

Is a jury guaranteed in civil trials?

No, but Either side can request a jury trial (no guarantee)

30
New cards

What does the jury decide in civil trials?

Liability and sometimes damages.

31
New cards

What is a bench trial?

A trial with no jury.

32
New cards

What does a judge decide in a bench trial?

Both questions of law (what laws apply, how to interpret them) and questions of fact (when no jury is present).

33
New cards

What are questions of law?

What laws apply and how they are interpreted.

34
New cards

What are questions of fact when no jury is present?

Determining what actually happened.

35
New cards

Where are bench trials common?

Less serious criminal cases and many civil disputes, including small claims and family law, as well as Cases where parties believe a judge will be less swayed by emotion

36
New cards

Why might parties prefer a bench trial?

They believe a judge will be less swayed by emotion.

37
New cards

What do judges always control during trials?

Rule on motions, objections, and admissibility of evidence, and charge the jury with instructions on the law (when a jury is used).

38
New cards

What does it mean that judges “charge the jury”?

Judges instruct the jury on the law.

39
New cards

What types of evidence do lawyers present?

• Witness testimony (what someone saw/heard).

• Physical documents, records, or objects.

• Expert opinions (treated as factual when qualified).

• Rules of evidence limit what is admitted → ensure reliability.

40
New cards

How is witness testimony defined?

What someone saw or heard.

41
New cards

How are expert opinions treated?

Treated as factual when the expert is qualified.

42
New cards

Why do rules of evidence exist?

To limit what is admitted and ensure reliability.

43
New cards

Besides evidence, what else do lawyers present?

Arguments: Interpretation of the facts and the Application of the law

44
New cards

What is interpretation of the facts?

“What the evidence means”,

Explaining what the evidence means.

45
New cards

What is application of the law?

“Which law should apply here?”

Explaining which law should apply to the case.

46
New cards

How do lawyers persuade judges and juries?

Persuasion of judge/jury through reasoning.

47
New cards

What is the jury’s role regarding facts?

Jury = finder of facts, Deciding which evidence is believable.

48
New cards

What is the judge’s role regarding law?

Judge = arbiter of law, Deciding which legal arguments are valid.

49
New cards

What is the key takeaway about facts and arguments?

Lawyers must combine/weave facts into arguments.

50
New cards

What is a fact in a legal case?

Evidence accepted as true by the decision-maker (jury or judge in a bench trial)

51
New cards

What is the first step in the deliberative process?

Lawyers present evidence.

52
New cards

What is the second step in the deliberative process?

The opposing side may challenge the evidence (cross-examination, objections).

53
New cards

What is the third step in the deliberative process?

The judge decides if the evidence is admissible (meets legal standards).

54
New cards

What is the fourth step in the deliberative process?

The jury (or judge in bench trial) decides how much weight to give the evidence.

55
New cards

When do facts become established in a case for purposes of the verdict?

Only after deliberation do “facts” get established for purposes of the verdict

56
New cards

What is evidence?

Information offered.

57
New cards

What are facts?

Information believed and recorded in the verdict.

58
New cards

Does all evidence become fact?

No. Not all evidence becomes fact.

59
New cards

What example illustrates evidence becoming fact?

A witness testifying that they saw the defendant at the scene. That is evidence. Jury decides whether to believe it → if yes, it becomes a fact in the case.

60
New cards

What is the dual court system?

A federal system + 50 state systems, including D.C. and territories.

61
New cards

What courts exist in each system?

• Trial (district) courts – fact-finding, evidence, initial rulings.

• Appellate courts – review for errors in law/procedure.

• Supreme court (court of last resort) – final say

62
New cards

What do trial courts do?

Fact-finding, hearing evidence, and issuing initial rulings.

63
New cards

What do appellate courts do?

Review for errors in law or procedure.

64
New cards

What role does a supreme court play?

Final authority and court of last resort.

65
New cards

What is criminal law?

Government prosecution of misdemeanors and felonies.

66
New cards

What is civil law?

Disputes between individuals or organizations.

(e.g., contracts, libel, divorce)

67
New cards

What case illustrates different burdens of proof?

O.J. Simpson’s criminal acquittal and civil liability.

68
New cards

Primary defining principles (or “Which court can hear the case?”):

• Subject matter jurisdiction – type of case (e.g., federal law, admiralty, constitutional).

• Personal jurisdiction – who is involved (connection between the defendant and the location, e.g., “minimum contacts rule”)

69
New cards

What is subject matter jurisdiction?

Authority to hear a particular type of case.

• Example: A bankruptcy court only hears bankruptcy cases → not divorce or criminal cases

70
New cards

What is personal jurisdiction?

Authority over the people involved in a case.

• Example: A Texas court can’t try a case against someone in Alaska unless they have ties (business, property, conduct) in Texas

71
New cards

What is the minimum contacts rule?

A defendant must have sufficient connection to the forum state.

(connection between the defendant and the location, e.g., “minimum contacts rule”)

72
New cards

Levels of jurisdiction (or “When and at what level the court hears the case?”)

• Original jurisdiction – trial (district) courts (evidentiary/fact-finding).

• Appellate jurisdiction – review courts (process & law; no new evidence).

73
New cards

What is original jurisdiction?

Authority of trial courts to hear cases first. (evidentiary/fact-finding).

74
New cards

What is appellate jurisdiction?

Authority to review lower court decisions. (process & law; no new evidence).

75
New cards

What is binding precedent?

Prior decisions that lower courts must follow.

• State appellate → binding within the state.

• Federal appellate → binding within circuit.

• U.S. Supreme Court → binding on all.

76
New cards

Binding precedent: State appellate

→ binding within state

77
New cards

Binding precedent: Federal appellate

→ binding within circuit.

78
New cards

Binding precedent: U.S. Supreme Court

→ binding on all.

79
New cards

What is forum shopping?

When a party tries to file a lawsuit in the court they believe will be most favorable to their case, rather than the court that has the closest or most appropriate connection to the dispute

80
New cards

How does the levels of jurisdiction prevent forum shopping?

It ensures cases are heard in the most appropriate court.

81
New cards

What areas of law does the Supreme Court shape?

Press freedom, speech rights, advertising, obscenity, and digital law among others

82
New cards

What regulatory bodies are impacted by Supreme Court decisions?

Impacts FCC, FTC, and regulatory powers

83
New cards

What is judicial review?

The power to overrule laws or executive actions.

84
New cards

Why does Supreme Court composition matter?

Ideology influences outcomes.

85
New cards

What ideological blocs exist on the Court?

• Liberal bloc – Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson

• Hardline conservative bloc – Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch

• Center-right swing bloc – Roberts, Kavanaugh, Barrett

86
New cards

Who is in the liberal bloc?

Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson.

87
New cards

Who is in the hardline conservative bloc?

Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch.

88
New cards

Who is in the center-right swing bloc?

Roberts, Kavanaugh, Barrett.

89
New cards

What did Dobbs v. Jackson (2022) do?

Returned abortion regulation authority to the states and overturned Roe v. Wade.

90
New cards

What did Allen v. Milligan (2023) demonstrate?

Roberts and Kavanaugh (center-right swing) siding with liberals on voting rights.

- Allen v. Milligan (2023) demonstrated the continued viability of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, with Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kavanaugh joining the liberal bloc in a 5-4 decision. It affirmed that Alabama’s congressional map likely violated the VRA by diluting Black voting power, requiring a second majority-Black district.

91
New cards

What begins a civil lawsuit?

A complaint filed by the plaintiff against defendant.

92
New cards

What is the defendant’s response called?

An answer admitting or denying claims and raising possible counterclaims.

93
New cards

What are pretrial motions?

Motions to dismiss or for summary judgment.

94
New cards

What happens during discovery?

Interrogatories, depositions, subpoenas, and document requests.

95
New cards

Settlement attempts: Why do many civil cases settle?

To resolve disputes before trial.

96
New cards

What happens if a civil case does not settle?

The trial proceeds if unresolved.

97
New cards

What are the steps of a criminal trial?

Investigation, charging, hearings, arraignment, discovery, plea, trial, sentencing, and appeal.

98
New cards

What is the role of a grand jury?

required federally for serious crimes by Fifth Amendment (true bill vs. no bill):

probable cause to indict; or presentment: statement of charging);

not always required by the states…some use preliminary hearings instead

99
New cards

What is a true bill?

A grand jury decision to indict.

(no bill is to not)

100
New cards

What is the burden of proof in criminal cases?

The prosecution must prove the defendant's guilt to a point where there is no reasonable doubt in the mind of a reasonable person.

  • This is significantly higher than the civil "preponderance of evidence" standard, which requires only that a claim is more likely true than not (typically >50% certainty).