1/22
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
MORAL REFRAMING
ROBB WILLER
makes opposing information easier to digest
UNIVERSAL AUDIENCE
author: Perelman & L. Olbrechts Tyteca
imaginary construct of an all-rational adult audience
helps assess arguments
ETHIC FOR RHETORIC
HENRY W. JONHSTONE
encouragement over suppression of others’ thoughts, opinions, etc.
question evidence but also be open to being questioned
BASIC TENANTS
resoluteness
openness
gentleness
compassion
WALTER FISHER
narrative paradigm
storytelling is most important form of communication
TOULMIN MODEL
claim
ground
warrant
modality: degree of certainty a speaker claims (probably, possibly)
rebuttal
MARKETPLACE OF IDEAS
JOHN STUART MILLS
expressing one’s thoughts leads to more truth revealed
express thought even if wrong, open opportunity to correct or challenge old ideas
ELABORATION LIKELIHOOD MODEL
PETTEY AND CAPCIOPPO
2 routes of persuasion
central route
aligns w/ toulmin—evidence
pure logos (logic)
claims, statistics, fact
peripheral route
aligns w/ fisher—story/emotion
pure pathos, persuade through audience connection emotionally
CENTRAL ROUTE OF PERSUASION (PETTEY AND CACIOPPO)
ROUTE OF PERSUASION
aligns w/ toulmin—evidence
pure logos (logic)
claims, statistics, fact
PERIPHERAL ROUTE OF PERSUASION (PETTEY & CACIOPPO)
ROUTE OF PERSUASION
aligns w/ fisher—story/emotion
pure pathos, persuade through audience connection emotionally
COGNITIVE DISSONANCE
LEON FESTINGER
steps of dissonance
recenter/balance the audience’s sense of dissonance
listeners may discredit sources
apply a plethora of sources
listeners reinterpret message/cherry pick
allow for space/pause to avoid overload
refer to johnstones compassion
listeners change behavior
COST REWARD
GEORGE HOMANS
think of argument as pro/con list
if more good then more likely to change
if more bad less likely to change
cost = disadvantage, reward = advantage
immediacy, forecasts, cumulative
HIERARCHY OF NEEDS
MASLOW
pyramid of needs, bottom tier are necessary in order to reach top of pyramid
self actualization
esteem
love/belonging
safety
physiological
INNOCULATION THEORY
MCGUIRES
highlighting possible inefficiencies in opponents argument before they speak
audience keeps inefficacies in mind and notes whenever opponent mentions
opponent is no longer arguing with you but the audience as well
POLICY PROPOSITIONS
uses “must, reform”
changing status quo
VALUE PROPOSITIONS
uses “ethical, unethical, right, wrong”
concerns opinions/values
FACT PROPOSITIONS
a predictions with the time, can not have already happened
we will build a hotel on the moon by 2070
POLICY STOCK ISSUES: TOPICALITY
are we staying on topic or going on tangent
identify and ensure relevancy
POLICY STOCK ISSUES: INHERENCY BARRIERS
institutional/structural
laws and rules
attitudinal
do people know or care about issue
trend
maybe not a big issue now but based on patterns it may become one
POLICY STOCK ISSUES: HARMS
negative effects towards society
POLICY STOCK ISSUES: PLAN
how will the harms be address and solved?
POLICY STOCK ISSUES: SIDE EFFECTS
advantages and disadvantages of issue being solved
TEST OF EVIDENCE
accuracy:
is it free of error?
verifiability:
are other CREDIBLE sources reporting similar findings?
recency:
is it up to date, is there more recent evidence?
methodology:
how was this info/conclusion obtained
proper research steps
scientific method
ensure large enough sample size
sufficiency:
is there enough evidence to support claim/research?
authorship/qualification:
who is author? what is their reputation?
relevance:
is evidence applicable to claim?