Week 1 - Allocation of Authority to Define Crimes

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/17

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

18 Terms

1
New cards

What did Rex v. Manley say about what to do with crimes with no statute?

You can be guilty of a crime at common law even if no statute specifically mentions it, where your conduct unfairly harms the public interest.

Facts: Manley told the police a man had hit her and stole from her. Story was untrue.

2
New cards

What is the usage for common law?

Judges can adapt to new situations by creating law despite no statute.

3
New cards

Why did common law tradition decline?

Large body of precedent built up, shift from courts to legislature

4
New cards

What is meant to punish criminal conduct contra bonos more et decorum?

Any conduct that is contrary to good morals or decency

5
New cards

What is the principle of legality?

Cannot punish for a crime unless law says so

6
New cards

Why Manley is a problem under the legality principle

judges defined crime by using broad common-law ideas, instead of applying a clear statute

7
New cards

What does nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege mean?

“no crime, no punishment, without law.”

8
New cards

According to legality, who should be defining crimes?

Legislatures

9
New cards

What are the two important features of legality?

  1. A cluster of ideas, not a single strict rule. This leaves room for interpretation by courts.

  2. Focus on how crimes get defined (who and when), not what behaviors are criminalized.

10
New cards

Why common law still plays a huge ongoing role in modern criminal statutes

  1. Courts use common law rules to interpret or fill in those statutes

  2. Statutes often copy common law terms

11
New cards

What is the “general part” of criminal law? And what is it based on ?

Doctrine applicable to many specific crimes such as self-defense or insanity

Based on common law

12
New cards

Where did legality come from?

Enlightenment, humans as rational

13
New cards

What did enlightenment thinkers believe about crimes?

criminal acts could be avoided by a credible penalty sufficient to outweigh the expected gain from wrongdoing.

In order to work, crimes and punishments had to be spelled out in advance

14
New cards

Who did Enlightenment thinkers identify to assess needs of society?

legislature, Crime definitions must be made before the act (prospective) and by lawmakers (legislative), not by judges after the fact

15
New cards

Do federal courts have the authority to create crimes in the common law fashion?

No must be enacted by Congress

16
New cards

Do state courts have the authority to create crimes in the common law fashion?

In the past, courts had authority to adapt old principles to new situations should need arise, but no longer applicable

17
New cards

What was the modern shift of the reasoning behind legality?

No longer about deterrence, focused on law’s moral integrity, predictability and fairness to D

18
New cards

How does legality help minorities?

rule of law demands clear crime definitions so police can't just arrest based on personal bias or judgments based on race, class, etc.