AP Government: Judicial Branch

0.0(0)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/25

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

26 Terms

1
New cards
Strict constructionist
one who argues a narrow interpretation of the Constitution's provisions
2
New cards
Loose constructionist (living constitutionalist)
A person who interprets the Constitution in the context of modern society. This usually allows the federal government to take actions that the constitution does not specifically forbid it from taking.
3
New cards
Stare decisis
Latin for let the decision stand; decisions are based on precedents from previous cases
4
New cards
Judicial activism
A judicial philosophy in which judges make bold policy decisions, even charting new constitutional ground. Advocates of this approach emphasize that the courts can correct pressing needs, especially those unmet by the majoritarian political process.
5
New cards
Judicial restraint
a theory of judicial interpretation that encourages judges to limit the exercise of their own power
6
New cards
Circuit courts
Intermediate federal appellate courts. Cover 13 "circuits" across America. Hear appeals from District Courts in their jurisdiction.
7
New cards
District courts
the lowest federal courts; federal cases begin here
8
New cards
Supreme Court justice
a member of the Supreme Court of the United States, the highest court in the nation. No age or experience requirement.
9
New cards
Marbury v. Madison
A decision of the Supreme Court which interpreted the Constitution as giving the Supreme Court the power to declare an act of Congress unconstitutional. This decision is the foundation of the federal judiciary's power of judicial review
10
New cards
Sollicitor General
the top government lawyer in all cases before the Supreme Court where the government is a party. appointed by the president
11
New cards
Writ of Certiorari
A formal writ used to bring a case before the Supreme Court.
12
New cards
Senatorial curtesy
Tradition where the U.S. senator from the state where a federal judiciary is open has a say in the president's nomination for the new judge
13
New cards
Majority Opinion
a statement that presents the views of the majority of supreme court justices regarding a case
14
New cards
Precedent
an earlier case or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.
15
New cards
Criminal Law
A law that defines crimes against the public
16
New cards
Civil Law
A law that governs relationships between individuals
17
New cards
Judicial Review
review by the US Supreme Court of the constitutional validity of a legislative act.
18
New cards
Litmus Test
A test of ideological purity used by recent presidents in selecting and senators in confirming judges to nominate to federal courts.
19
New cards
Concurring Opinion
An opinion that agrees with the majority in a Supreme Court ruling but differs on the reasoning.
20
New cards
original jurisdiction
the power of a court to hear a case first, before any other court
21
New cards
appeallate jurisdiction
The authority of a court to review decisions made by lower courts
22
New cards
dissenting opinion
A statement written by a justice who disagrees with the majority opinion, presenting his or her opinion
23
New cards
Federalist 78
written by Alexander Hamilton, says that judicial branch is the least dangerous branch, requires permanence, and argues that the federal courts have the job of determining whether acts of Congress are constitutional
24
New cards

Criteria for judging a case "uncertworthy"

Absurd or frivolous claims

Lack of "percolation"

Cases with bad facts

Pipeline considerations

Consensus with the lower courts

25
New cards

Criteria for judging a case "certworthy"

Circuit conflict

Importance

Breadth

Effect on federal government

Areas of interest to the Justices

Egregious legal errors in lower courts

26
New cards

Checks on the Judiciary

president appoints judges but the senate confirms all judges and justices, no enforcement mechanisms, congress can over rule rulings with new laws or amendments, impeachment and threat of impeachment, congress can change the number of justices by law