Use and Protection of Human and Animal Subjects – Key Vocabulary

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/29

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Thirty vocabulary flashcards summarizing essential ethical terms, historical studies, regulations, and principles related to the protection of human and animal research subjects.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

30 Terms

1
New cards

Nuremberg Code (1947)

Ten principles that established voluntary, informed consent and risk-benefit limits for human experimentation after WWII war-crime trials.

2
New cards

Declaration of Helsinki (1964)

World Medical Association ethical code for human research; adds requirements for independent review boards, vulnerable populations, and six later revisions.

3
New cards

Belmont Report (1978)

U.S. document outlining the three core principles—Respect for Persons, Beneficence, and Justice—that guide ethical human-subjects research.

4
New cards

Common Rule (1991)

Federal policy (45 CFR 46) that codifies protections for human subjects, IRB requirements, and informed-consent standards across U.S. agencies.

5
New cards

Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Committee that reviews proposed human-subjects research to ensure risks are minimized, benefits justified, and ethical standards met.

6
New cards

Full Board Review

IRB review category for studies involving more than minimal risk or vulnerable populations; requires discussion and vote by the convened board.

7
New cards

Expedited Review

IRB process for minimal-risk studies fitting specific categories; reviewed by the chair or designated reviewers instead of the full board.

8
New cards

Exempt Review

Research categories considered very low risk and exempt from ongoing IRB oversight, although an initial determination is still required.

9
New cards

Informed Consent

Process ensuring participants receive understandable information, voluntarily agree, and may withdraw without penalty before or during a study.

10
New cards

Consent Form

Written document (≈6th-grade reading level, second-person) signed by subject, witness, and investigator, summarizing study purpose, procedures, risks, and rights.

11
New cards

Beneficence

Ethical principle requiring researchers to maximize possible benefits and minimize potential harms to participants and society.

12
New cards

Justice

Ethical principle demanding equitable selection of subjects and fair distribution of research burdens and benefits.

13
New cards

Respect for Persons

Principle emphasizing individual autonomy, voluntary participation, and additional protection for those with diminished decision-making capacity.

14
New cards

Research (45 CFR 46.102[d])

Systematic investigation designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge, including development, testing, and evaluation.

15
New cards

Human Subject (45 CFR 46.102[f])

Living individual about whom data or identifiable private information are obtained via intervention or interaction for research purposes.

16
New cards

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)

Body overseeing animal research to ensure humane care, compliance with regulations, and ethical scientific justification.

17
New cards

Animal Welfare Act (1966)

U.S. federal law setting minimum standards for housing, handling, and care of research animals; amended multiple times for stricter protections.

18
New cards

Unit 731

Japanese WWII program that infected prisoners with pathogens and concealed results as work on “monkeys,” exemplifying unethical human experimentation.

19
New cards

Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment

1932–1972 U.S. study where Black sharecroppers with syphilis were misled and left untreated to observe disease progression.

20
New cards

Operation Whitecoat

1950s-1970s study where conscientious objectors (mostly Seventh-day Adventists) voluntarily exposed themselves to pathogens to test vaccines.

21
New cards

Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital Study (1963)

Researchers injected elderly patients with live cancer cells without proper informed consent to study immune rejection.

22
New cards

Willowbrook Hepatitis Study

1956–1971 New York state-school study infecting mentally disabled children with hepatitis; parents consented partly to secure admission.

23
New cards

Monster Study (1939)

University of Iowa experiment giving orphaned children positive or negative speech feedback to observe development of stuttering.

24
New cards

Milgram Obedience Study (1963)

Yale experiment showing that ordinary individuals would administer what they believed were painful electric shocks under authority pressure.

25
New cards

Tearoom Trade Study (1970)

Sociological research by Laud Humphreys observing anonymous public sexual encounters without initial consent, raising privacy concerns.

26
New cards

Risk (Research Context)

Potential physical, psychological, social, legal, or economic harm that may arise from participation, both immediate and latent.

27
New cards

Benefit (Research Context)

Value or advantage to the subject or society; financial payment is not considered a research benefit in ethical analysis.

28
New cards

Vulnerable Subjects

Populations such as children, prisoners, pregnant women, cognitively impaired, or students who may require extra protections during research.

29
New cards

Consent Process

Dialogue before participation in which investigators disclose information, assess comprehension, and obtain voluntary agreement.

30
New cards

Risk/Benefit Analysis

IRB evaluation comparing anticipated harms with potential gains to ensure the benefit-to-risk ratio is ethically favorable.