1/35
Chapter 14
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Maintenance and Repair
Relationship maintenance
ABC’s aimed at sustaining desired relationship
Two approaches to studying RM mechanisms: Investment
Satisfaction, alternatives, sunk costs
Two approaches to studying RM mechanisms: Communication
Functional and dysfunctional pattern
Cognitive relationship maintenance mechanisms
Cognitive interdependence
See ourselves as part of a greater entity
Use more plural pronouns, such as we, us, and ours instead of I, me, and mine
Cognitive component of mutuality
whole is greater than the sum of its parts
Positive illusions about partner and relationship
Perceived superiority: Think your relationship better and more special than most others
Less likely to give up on something special
Self-serving bias at the relational level
Inattention to alternatives
Committed partners pay less attention to other potential available partners
Uninterested and unaware of how well they could be doing in alternative relationships
Devaluation and derogation of alternative
Judge alternatives to be less desirable than others think they are
Disparage those who could lure them away from their existing relationships
Simpson et. al (1990) study
Heterosexual men and women who were either dating someone or not dating someone
Rated a variety of ads on likability and persuasiveness
Measured attractiveness of other sex ad models
Results: Men who were dating found other sex models less attractive than those who were single. Women who were dating also found other sex models less attractive than those single
Simpson et al (1990) study replication
effect only found among highly committed participants
Effect only found when threat is seen as a realistic threat
Behavioral relationship maintenance mechanisms
Michelangelo phenomenon
Partners encourage and help us become the person that we want to be
Support partners who take on new roles and responsibilities
Accommodation
control negative impulses during conflict
Don’t fight fire with fire
Requires high levels of self-control
Behavioral relationship maintenance mechanisms:
engage in novel, exciting activities together
Misattribution of arousal
Think partner is cause of arousal
Behavioral relationship maintenance mechanisms: Classical conditioning
Associate fun feelings with partner
Behavioral relationship maintenance mechanisms: Savoring
play attention to and enjoy shared pleasures
Display eager anticipation for event
Be alert during the event
Show gratifying reminiscence after event
Rituals
Develop familiar mountains and traditions
Symbolize and reinforce identity as couple
Small, private customs and comfortable habits
Forgiveness
committed couples tend to be more forgiving
Quickens the healing of the relationship
Helps partners move past transgressions
Willingness to sacrifice
Doing things that you would prefer not to do
Not doing things that you would like to do to
Effort justification
increase commitment simply because you’ve made sacrifices
Approach motives for sacrifice
Achieve positive outcomes
Avoidance notices for sacrifice
Avoid negative outcomes
Impute, Gabie, and Peplov (2005) study
14-day daily experience study
sacrifice and motives for doing so
Personal well-being (PWB)
Relationship quality
Likelihood of breaking up
Followed up a month later to see if broke up
Results: Approach motives associated with higher quality PWB, and lower likelihood of break up
Avoidance motives associated with lower quality, PWB, and higher likelihood of breakup
Sacrificing for avoidance motives was stronger predictor of breakup than not making sacrifices
Staying content: Positivity
Strive to be polite and cheerful to one another
Remain optimistic about future together
Staying content: Assurances
Continue to announce and demonstrate love, commitment, and positive regard
Sharing tasks
Do fair share of household chores/ parenting
Pick up slack when one partner needs it
openness
share thought and feelings
Remain transparent
Relationship repair
Do it yourself
Preventive maintenance
Therapy
Emotion, behavior, cognition (or combination)
Individual or couple (or both)
Present or past or Both)
Behavioral therapy
Replace negative behaviors with positive ones
Develop functional communication skills
Paraphrasing, perception checking, validation, XYZ statements
Love days
One partner does favors for other Quid pro quo contract
Desired behavior by one is rewarded by desired behavior by the other good faith contract
Reward changes in behavior with special privileges
Cognitive behavioral
BCT + cognitions about relationship and partner
Change ways partner think about relationship selective attention
more reasonable expectations
Relationship-enhancing attributions
Integrative behavioral couple therapy
BCT + acceptance of and adaptive emotional emotions to partner’s flows
-Encourage desirable behaviors
-Teach tolerance of incompatibilities that partners cannot or one unlikely in change
Empathic joining
Express pain without blame or resentment that will make partner defensive Unified detachment
Discuss negative events without triggering negative emotions
Tolerance building
Taught how to become less sensitive
React less intensely when problems to occur
Emotionally focused couple therapy
Increase attachment security
Assess emotional fears that underline problems
Have each partner acknowledge feelings
Collaborate to solve problems and rehearse the new accepting behaviors
Insight oriented therapy
People may carry unconscious scars from past relationships that may contaminate the present
Emphasis on individual vulnerabilities and post
Affective reconstruction
-Re-image and revisit other relationships to identify themes and coping style
Therapy effectiveness
Provide explanations for relationship diffculties
2.3 who seriously participate no longer unhappy
Likely depends on sincerity and effort
The sooner, the better
One brand of therapy not better than any other
Take home message
Emotional, psychological, and physical health
Attend to both positive and negatives
Negative behaviors have their upsides
Positive behaviors have their downsides
Insist on seeing the data over anecdotes (your experience)
There are always exceptions to the “rule”
Explanations are not exceses